Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Most over-rated steroids?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 33117
  • Start date Start date

Which of these compounds, in your experience is the most over-rated in its effects?

  • winstrol

    Votes: 26 28.0%
  • anavar

    Votes: 23 24.7%
  • boldenone

    Votes: 12 12.9%
  • nandrolone

    Votes: 14 15.1%
  • trenbolone

    Votes: 10 10.8%
  • primobolan

    Votes: 17 18.3%
  • testosterone

    Votes: 1 1.1%

  • Total voters
    93
I don't know, but Ulter has definitely convinced me to try Winny! :lmao:

So look forward to my "Winny sucks -- it's been 6 weeks and I look more like Robin Williams than Fuckenshredded" post in 6 weeks!
 
Glad to see the responses. By just starting this thread I wanted to see a open discussion of why or why not some steroids might be better than others, and am gald people cam to the conclusion that it is possible to make gains on ANY steroid.

In any event, its amusing that winstrol has the most votes here. I personally find winstrol to be a very strong compound for adding size, strength, vascularity and hardness without signifigant side effects. I find that it seems to greatly amplify the ganis of any other compound it is stacked with. I'm currently running winstrol with eq and seeing outstanding results. I'm down 16 lbs in 3 weeks, but have gained strength and added 1/4 of an inch to my arms in this time (they are up to 19" now).
 
EQ is way over-rated. I used it for cutting and was not impressed. Doesn't compare to Winstrol for hardness and vascularity. Why use EQ to cut when Tren and Winny blows it out of the water?
 
EQ does definitely LOWER MY Libdo, esp when on fina. But on the other hand deca, has recently given me deca dick.


I am staying clear of both of them for about 6 months.
 
Methandrostenolone/Dianabol (aka DBol) was not on the list.
"Breakfast of Champions"??

Headaches, lethargy, high blood pressue, loss of libido, estrogenic side effects, low-back pump pains, water bloat, liver toxicity and almost complete loss of gains.
Throwing out the cost, it has got to be worst pros/cons AS ever made IMO.
 
I think test is most overrated. Everyone wants to do test and I look at the keepable gains and they are rated only at 30% with 60-70% chance of side-effects. Wouldn't one rather do deca with 80% keepable gains and 50% chance of side-effects?? just my opinion..
 
Most all the side effects with test are well documented and easily controlled. I think Fina is overrated. It is a great and powerful drug but newbies will have you thinking it's like having a full body transplant...and the side effects can be harsher than test.
 
meatneck said:
I think test is most overrated. Everyone wants to do test and I look at the keepable gains and they are rated only at 30% with 60-70% chance of side-effects. Wouldn't one rather do deca with 80% keepable gains and 50% chance of side-effects?? just my opinion..

is this opinion or based on results from your own cycles??????theres a huge difference between losing water weight and muscle..not every lb of weight gain equals muscle..some blow up 30 lbs on a cycle and think its all muscle most likely it isnt!!
 
Top Bottom