More WTC Conspiracy theories, but this one acutally makes you think!

[_Yossarian_]

Instead, I would ask, is it possible that perhaps 4 planes were hijacked by amateur, simulator-trained camel jockeys and three found their targets and the fourth crashed?

hell no! that would make way too much sense, and where's the fun it that?

 

[dballer]

Interesting theory, but why would they let them carsh?

This would give the United States a reason to go over and do the dirty work for Israel. The planes crash into the WTC and now the American people are pissed.. and we blame it on some muslim.. that gives us a chance to go over there.. wipe out their government and give power of that land to Israel. Then they can have all of the oil from Iraq and begin selling it to us and other countries. That is why.

 

[ariolanine]

An elaborate scheme isn't necessary. Just blow up an old, empty ship and say the arabs did it. We already had other shit on Bin laden. That's all that was needed. You forget that most Americans already hate muslims. Killing 3,000 Americans would only be necessary to convince us to go to war with other white people.

 

[bigdollarallo]

why on the subject
check this out

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

 

[bigdollarallo]

http://www.flight93crash.com/
http://www.ifrance.fr/silentbutdeadly/

 

[bigdollarallo]

http://www.flight93crash.com/
http://www.ifrance.fr/silentbutdeadly/

http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/Schmid/PentagonPlaneCrash.html

 

[Imnotdutch]

Somebodies imagination is runing a little wild today........

Nobody had confirmed that the first plane was a terrorist attack prior to the second plane hitting. Why would Air Traffic Control of all people have figured this out? At such early times it was just a possibility. So anyway, the second plane would not have been shot down. The third 'crashed'........read into that what you will.

Also, just having an F-16 up there does not mean that it was combat ready. Or for that matter that the authorities were willing to shoot a passenger plane down......especially if it is near highly populated areas (not sure if this is the case).

The last line just made me laugh.......your military is too good to shoot planes down witohut a confirmed reason especially if there is the possibility of less casualties.

When golfer Payne Stewart died in a plane crash it was immediately known that the plane had lost cabin pressure. How did they know this, because 7 minutes after the plane lost contact with air traffic control, the air force had an F-16 up there to see what was going on and the pilot made visual confirmation that it lost pressure.

F-16s are always on standby if shit goes down and they go into action immediately if there is ever a possible threat. That was just one example.

Now on 9/11, the first plane hit and the NTSB and Air traffic control knew we were under terrorist attack. Then what, 15 minutes later the second plane hit, then the third "crashed" in PA, and there was a 4th flying straight toward Washington DC.

If nobody knew what was happening the second plane would have been shot down as soon as it lost contact with air traffic control, so would have the third plane.

Now the 4th plane, 45min after we knew we were under attack, with Andrews Air Force base right there would have probably been shot out of the sky if an Arab had even stood up to go take a piss.

I dont think our govt was behind the attacks or anything, but there is much more to the story than we hear on the news. I remember hearing initial reports that 8 planes had been hijacked, which turned out to be false. But it would not suprise me if 8 were and we were only able to shoot down 5 in the 45 minute time frame of the attack.

Our miitary is way too good to let something like that just happen.

 

[Code]

This is NOT new, it was postulated within days of 911.

*+YAWN+*

 

[Immortal Juicer]

Re: Re: More WTC Conspiracy theories, but this one acutally makes you think!

Somebodies imagination is runing a little wild today........

Nobody had confirmed that the first plane was a terrorist attack prior to the second plane hitting. Why would Air Traffic Control of all people have figured this out? At such early times it was just a possibility. So anyway, the second plane would not have been shot down. The third 'crashed'........read into that what you will.

Also, just having an F-16 up there does not mean that it was combat ready. Or for that matter that the authorities were willing to shoot a passenger plane down......especially if it is near highly populated areas (not sure if this is the case).

The last line just made me laugh.......your military is too good to shoot planes down witohut a confirmed reason especially if there is the possibility of less casualties.

That wasnt the case, the plane went down right over a scarcely populated area, where there were no people living. It could not have crashed in a better place. Our military is good enough to shoot a plane down with a minimal amount of casualties.

 

[Imnotdutch]

Re: Re: Re: More WTC Conspiracy theories, but this one acutally makes you think!

Ok........fair enough. BTW which plane are you talking about......what about the second? But how soon did you know it was a terrorist attack? Was there enough time to arm the intercepting planes?

You'll have to excuse me on the 'our military is good enough' bit. No offence, but your military is good at giving the impression that they are very good........far better than they are (mind you the same could be said about the military in many countries).

That wasnt the case, the plane went down right over a scarcely populated area, where there were no people living. It could not have crashed in a better place. Our military is good enough to shoot a plane down with a minimal amount of casualties.