Michael Moore on the O'Reilly Factor tonight

[Robert Jan]

Most people who are labelled pussies are in fact superior to a degree they are unrelated to the person who calls them such. What kind of grown man would refer to somebody as a "pussy" anyway? What is this? third grade?

 

[The Wenis]

Tell me, what is your view on muslims?

lol. i know where you're going with this. but this alter isn't who you think it is. but i know who it is

 

[bluepeter]

lol. i know where you're going with this. but this alter isn't who you think it is. but i know who it is

Wasn't thinking curling actually

 

[Code]

Honestly?

They would do well to remove 60% of the humor and I'd listen more often.

You must believe everything Fox says.

http://www.airamericaradio.com/

They are alive and kicking.

Also, get this. A clear channel sports station in Miami-Dade just went total Air America for a 6 mnth shot. LOL!!!

 

[WODIN]

Honestly?

They would do well to remove 60% of the humor and I'd listen more often.

Yeah honestly....Weird bedfellows without a doubt.

 

[Tactile]

I used to respect Moore back in the days of "Roger And Me", and when he would expose a lot of the nasty corportate goings on, but I feel he crossed a line with Farenheit 911. I just started drifting off 2/3's of the way through because it was just an unrelenting assault of the same message. I don't even fully trust his opinion anymore because of the fancy slice & splice job done with Columbine.

If his main concern was getting the message out with 911 I feel he could've done it with a straight to video, or a possible documentary on TV, so everyone could easily see it. Just an added bonus that he's become filthy rich from the theatre release I suppose.

 

[Testosterone boy]

I used to respect Moore back in the days of "Roger And Me", and when he would expose a lot of the nasty corportate goings on, but I feel he crossed a line with Farenheit 911. I just started drifting off 2/3's of the way through because it was just an unrelenting assault of the same message. I don't even fully trust his opinion anymore because of the fancy slice & splice job done with Columbine.

If his main concern was getting the message out with 911 I feel he could've done it with a straight to video, or a possible documentary on TV, so everyone could easily see it. Just an added bonus that he's become filthy rich from the theatre release I suppose.

You fault him for making the most popular documentary of all time and releasing it to theatres?


I think Mooore is all about protecting the interests of the little guy. That is my take. He is just unusually good at it.

 

[strangebrew]

LOL @ people saying Moore owned O'Reily. It just didn't happen. O'Reily didn't own Moore either. It's not possible to own someone in a debate when that "someone" argues like a child - a complete lack of logic and sense. Let's face it, Moore owned himself without any help from O'Reily.

I'm not a fan of Reily either, but I don't understand how some of you fail to see Moore for who he really is - a blithering idiot. The fact that F911 has made over 100k is a testament to just how stupid some people are.

 

[casualbb]

O'Reilly's claim: Bush didn't lie, he acted honestly on faulty intelligence.

That's not 100% true. In the days after 911, which Moore was TRYING to say while getting interrupted, was that Bush went to the intelligence officials and said "Look into Iraq." They said we got no link. He then made them double- and triple-check it. They stuck to their guns.

Eventually he found someone who would say yes.

The point is, before launching a hugely expensive and American life-risking endeavor, he was NOT saying "Are you super-sure these guys pose a threat? We need to be 100% sure." Instead he SOUGHT and seized upon the faulty evidence that was given and pushed us into it.

All OReilly could say was "blah blah blah brutal dictator." Which is obviously bullshit, there are a dozen equally brutal biatches in other nations.

THAT'S why moore was trying to force OReilly to answer the "would you send your children" question, and that's why the big O kept avoiding it. The underlying question was, do the premises of war hold up to scrutiny such that YOU would send your child to risk his/her life? And OReilly's implied answer was no.

 

[Testosterone boy]

O'Reilly's claim: Bush didn't lie, he acted honestly on faulty intelligence.

That's not 100% true. In the days after 911, which Moore was TRYING to say while getting interrupted, was that Bush went to the intelligence officials and said "Look into Iraq." They said we got no link. He then made them double- and triple-check it. They stuck to their guns.

Eventually he found someone who would say yes.

The point is, before launching a hugely expensive and American life-risking endeavor, he was NOT saying "Are you super-sure these guys pose a threat? We need to be 100% sure." Instead he SOUGHT and seized upon the faulty evidence that was given and pushed us into it.

All OReilly could say was "blah blah blah brutal dictator." Which is obviously bullshit, there are a dozen equally brutal biatches in other nations.

THAT'S why moore was trying to force OReilly to answer the "would you send your children" question, and that's why the big O kept avoiding it. The underlying question was, do the premises of war hold up to scrutiny such that YOU would send your child to risk his/her life? And OReilly's implied answer was no.

well put.

Approaches my lucidity which goes totally unnoticed.