"Michael Moore Hates America" movie trailer

[75th]

Ha........as an intel guy you know all about covers.

They would not want him to look well financed. Lets see how it plays out before dismissing the idea of him being backed.

Ok, so in actuality he has been bankrolled millions upon millions of dollars to make this 80 minute documentary. However, to cover their tracks, the right-wing militias that financed this film spend only $10,000 on equipment and are doing their best to ensure that the least amount of people possible know about or actually see this movie when (if) it is ever released. Doesnt sound like the best way to get their views out.

Basically, if it appears professional its a conspiracy. If it appears as a student film, its a conspiracy. You nuts dont leave much room for any grey area do you?

 

[Testosterone boy]

Ok, so in actuality he has been bankrolled millions upon millions of dollars to make this 80 minute documentary. However, to cover their tracks, the right-wing militias that financed this film spend only $10,000 on equipment and are doing their best to ensure that the least amount of people possible know about or actually see this movie when (if) it is ever released. Doesnt sound like the best way to get their views out.

Basically, if it appears professional its a conspiracy. If it appears as a student film, its a conspiracy. You nuts dont leave much room for any grey area do you?

I am saying lets see how it plays out.

I would not be surprised if the "film quality" magically improves when the spotlight is shone on it.

The "nuts" comment is uncalled for. Merely sends all opposing viewpoints to the bottom where oink and his ilk are sloppin' around.

 

[Testosterone boy]

http://www.michaelmoorehatesamerica.com/trailer_lrg.html

Good to see someone took it upon themselves to turn the tables on this guy. Dont get me wrong, Ill see Moore's new film, but Ill be sure to persuade everyone I know to see this one as well.

The sad thing is not nearly as many people know about it.

The right wing trying to fight with film is like trying to fight an alligator.........in the water.

This will backfire..........the right wing is outgunned by 10-1 when it comes to making film.

 

[75th]

I am saying lets see how it plays out.

I would not be surprised if the "film quality" magically improves when the spotlight is shone on it.

The "nuts" comment is uncalled for. Merely sends all opposing viewpoints to the bottom where oink and his ilk are sloppin' around.

You cant improve the quality of film unless you go back and shoot everything again. Judging from the trailer, it looks like it was shot in 16mm or Super-16. The only thing our right-wing friends would be able to improve upon is the sound.

 

[75th]

This will backfire..........the right wing is outgunned by 10-1 when it comes to making film.

At least someone admits there is a more liberal (although I hate generalizing things as either liberl/conservative) leaning when it comes to the media.

 

[Testosterone boy]

You cant improve the quality of film unless you go back and shoot everything again. Judging from the trailer, it looks like it was shot in 16mm or Super-16. The only thing our right-wing friends would be able to improve upon is the sound.

They could, and probably did, compress the hell out of the film for the internet.

Digital camcorders cost $300-$4000 and the footage looks good up to maybe a 40" screen if you sit several feet away.

Next step up is Betacam at 750 lines per inch instead of an iffy 500. Betacam footage can be played on the big screen, it was used for the underwater footage of Jaqueline Bisset in The Deep. Betacams costs at least $5000...probably more. They can be rented, leased, or bought used of course.

A person could buy a used VHS camcorder for a hundred dollars and the footage looks fantastic on a regular TV.

I'm just saying the footage was highly compressed for internet play.

Fahrenheit 9/11 is a powerful movie. The GOP stormtroopers are assembling as we speak.

Didn't we all know this election be a war? I talked of hiding in a bunker myself. The heat will turn up each month.

I predict enormous fallout if the Supreme Court once again rules in Jr's favor. The election could easily be that close...sure is shaping up that way.

 

[rushx79]

people will know about this movie-fox new will hype it up. they had something about it on the drudge report the other day.

 

[mb2]

Let's see. Rush, who settles lawsuits for inaccuracy constantly, has 10 hours as week. Hannity, even more. Ditto for O'Reilly. Moore makes a two-hour piece of propaganda and people act like he's done something unique.

I mean, what is Moore's wacky conspiracy theory at the beginning of his movie compared to the mulit-million-dollar effort to prove the Whitewater conspiracy -- or to pin Vince Foster's death on Hillary Clinton, promoted by right wing loonies like Rush even now?

The right is frothing at the mouth over this movie because they can't bear to see their own tactics turned back on them.

 

[Testosterone boy]

The whole "Michael Moore hates America" jingo is very simplistic and totally misleading.

Michale moore hates the problems with America. He certainly has the finances to live anywhere he wants to and chooses America because of its good points.

His films shine the spotlight on the problems with America and those problems will not be fixed until the spotlight shines brightly enough.

None of us will agree with all of his viewpoints just as none of us will agree with all of anybodies viewpoints.

I call his efforts patriotism........he simply wants a better America for more people. Lets be honest folks............America currently takes care of the super rich and pretty well ignores the rest. That phenomenon has grown 1000% more pronounced since the neocons seized control of the reigns of power back in the early 1980's.

 

[ManOfArms]

haha.... see im dangerouse because im an american that is comfortable with fighting.. .a question for thoes who are not, what if the goverment became abusive and needed to be changed would you fight to change things? im talking like civil war here. see it was a differant kind of scoiety back then.. .where men would attack the great country they loved if they felt thier freedoms were being taken by its goverment. so to the goverment i am dangerouse...

and this man michael moore is dangerouse because he shows some truth that people are not suppose to see.

and men like him would be the fire starters that could start another civil war

-when i work all day to pay for poor familys on welfair!?

-when they tax me sooooo much i can barly buy the things i really want!?

-when all the breaks go to the super poor or super rich!?

-when im treated like a criminal/terrorist at work,at the airport,at baseball games!?

-when i can barly afford a good health coverage for my family.. but i see millions of seniors marching into pharmacys every day for thier weekly 10lbs of perscriptions. and all they really need to do is get off the couch and walk instead of swalloing pills.

-when im daily told how free and lucky i am in america.. .yet everyday i watch more laws, more freedoms taken away.

when im beaten down ... and carrying so much on my shoulders, and im not happy... and burried in debt and am sooooo fed up.

when this becomes the legacy of all your wage earning ,hard working middleclass americans........ you have a seriouse problem

latley (in my opinion) terrorism has been a perfect distraction to the points iv made above. how convienient for the goverment.

now they can simply emply they are doing a good job because we are not under attack by terror......

im not gunna finish my thaught becuse its a dangerouse one

BO-DEN

The way things are have been for a long time and will not change no matter who becomes our next president. So everyone, attack and blame who you wish.