Hey guys
Age: 22
Weight: 190lbs
BF: 15%~
Height: 5'9
This question had just occurred to me though this statement may be a logical fallacy, here it goes.
If someone did a bulk cycle [Test 500/Deca 400] for 12 weeks and gains 20 lbs then "cruises" on Test @ 350 a week for 10 weeks and slowly reduces calories to cut then PCT then maintaine
Would it be more beneficial to run a BULK/CUT > PCT > Maintain rather than Bulk > PCT > Maintain > Cut, to hold onto muscle from the bulk.
Now ofcourse its a longer cycle = harder shutdown and extensive PCT. Keeping in mind the PCT is dialed in and all ancillaries at hand.
Hopefully this made sence..
Age: 22
Weight: 190lbs
BF: 15%~
Height: 5'9
This question had just occurred to me though this statement may be a logical fallacy, here it goes.
If someone did a bulk cycle [Test 500/Deca 400] for 12 weeks and gains 20 lbs then "cruises" on Test @ 350 a week for 10 weeks and slowly reduces calories to cut then PCT then maintaine
Would it be more beneficial to run a BULK/CUT > PCT > Maintain rather than Bulk > PCT > Maintain > Cut, to hold onto muscle from the bulk.
Now ofcourse its a longer cycle = harder shutdown and extensive PCT. Keeping in mind the PCT is dialed in and all ancillaries at hand.
Hopefully this made sence..