Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Macadamia Nut diet

solidg

New member
I read in a book that if you ate a handful of macadamia nuts 6 times a day
and you drank a lot of water that you would lose weight. Ive been trying this for a couple weeks. I do cheat a little sometimes at dinner time. I've lost about 10 pounds so far. Im 5'9" I was 270 now Im 260. Do you think this type of diet is healthy. Its more like a fast then a diet I guess. Id like to weigh about 190.
 
Calorie in vs calories out homes. Though macadamia nuts have a decent fat profile, they are hardly the optimal choice to lose weight. I love your macronutrient profile of 2/2/96 (p/c/f)

Solid bor.

Might as well consume some cabbage soup for some fiber ;)
 
sawastea said:
Calorie in vs calories out homes. Though macadamia nuts have a decent fat profile, they are hardly the optimal choice to lose weight. I love your macronutrient profile of 2/2/96 (p/c/f)

Solid bor.

Might as well consume some cabbage soup for some fiber ;)
he redded me for my post on this thread
 
Lestat said:
lol @ how ridiculous this is


It's actually not ridiculous as it sounds, its a variation on the fastest way to lose weight called a "fat fast". Its an extreme ketogenic diet and macadamia nuts are high in fat, its the 90% fat, thousand calorie diet type of thing used in the famous Naval hospital study where people lost 15 pounds of fat on average 14.5 pounds were fat vs. the control which was complete fast(no food) who lost 21 pounds of which only 7.5 pounds were fat meaning they lost 14 pounds of lean body mass.
It works extremely well but people cant stick to it


edit, the weight loss demonstrated was over ten days with hydrostatic testing and carbon measurements
 
Last edited:
Ive posted about the mechanism he is referring to before in great detail. But its basically promoting the most favorable insulin/glucagon ratio for fat loss.
Insulin = storage hormone
Glucagon = release hormone

They basically work in opposition to each other and insulin overrides glucagon. Too much insulin equals hard to liberate fat from fat cells.

Fat cell liberation becomes ketone bodies with enough glucagon.

In low calorie situations:
High carb percentage increases insulin reducing liberation of fat from fat cells for energy overriding glucagon action.
High protein percentage is better but protein converts to sugars through the often forgot metabolic pathway of 'neoglucogenesis' (new glucose genesis)
High fat percentage means very low if any insulin release allowing glucagon to run amuck liberating fat stores where you are literally "peeing out" ketone bodies and excess energy that can be measured by ketostix.

The practice of eating some fat over complete fasting helps the system out by preventing "neoglucogenesis" affecting insulin release which happens when the body metabolizes muscle in the times of starvation. Eating fat to lose fat seems illogical but there is scientific evidence to explain it and research proving it.
 
BrothaBill said:
Ive posted about the mechanism he is referring to before in great detail. But its basically promoting the most favorable insulin/glucagon ratio for fat loss.
Insulin = storage hormone
Glucagon = release hormone

They basically work in opposition to each other and insulin overrides glucagon. Too much insulin equals hard to liberate fat from fat cells.

Fat cell liberation becomes ketone bodies with enough glucagon.

In low calorie situations:
High carb percentage increases insulin reducing liberation of fat from fat cells for energy overriding glucagon action.
High protein percentage is better but protein converts to sugars through the often forgot metabolic pathway of 'neoglucogenesis' (new glucose genesis)
High fat percentage means very low if any insulin release allowing glucagon to run amuck liberating fat stores where you are literally "peeing out" ketone bodies and excess energy that can be measured by ketostix.

The practice of eating some fat over complete fasting helps the system out by preventing "neoglucogenesis" affecting insulin release which happens when the body metabolizes muscle in the times of starvation. Eating fat to lose fat seems illogical but there is scientific evidence to explain it and research proving it.

Thats interesting

Please tell me more
 
wow solidg was right! Brothabill has this awesome ability of proving even the most ridiculous statements 100% true!
 
Lestat said:
wow solidg was right! Brothabill has this awesome ability of proving even the most ridiculous statements 100% true!

BS!!!

Brothabill, prove this: Lestat is STR8

I dare you MFer, I DOUBLE DARE YOU!
 
solidg said:
Thats interesting

Please tell me more

basically, when trying to replicate the research showing this effect. You would want to keep your 90% fat, 10% protein with zero carbs. This can be done with oils or even cream cheese.
Macadamia nuts will work b/c they are primarily fat, other nuts contain carbs so they dont work.

You dont want any "substance" that will increase "insulin" production. That includes protein or carbs and it also means you "HAVE" to have some calories in your diet to prevent you from using lean muscle to fuel you.

SO, the only thing left is dietary fat. That is where the macadamia nuts come in. They provide energy to utilize given you limit the amount to about 1000 calories. You cant eat 10,000 calories worth obviously or you'll gain weight like an artic bear preparing for hibernation.

The key is calorie deprivation coupled with the optimal hormonal environment to 'liberate' energy from the fat cells as a primary energy source.
Macadamia nuts is just one example of a high fat food with virtually nothing else. If you wanted optimal. then just take a small shot of oil per feeding with nothing else for ten days and you would lose the most weight.

The key thing is that insulin is nonexistant, the calorie deprivation is there and you have glucagon hormone running rampant over the usual insulin predominance. This will make you "pee" out ketones. Ketones are the byproducts of fat breakdown. Thats the way fat is used, fat goes to ketone bodies then burned but in excess, you will piss and shit out more energy than you use
Meaning, in the optimal fat fast diet, you will lose 1.5lbs on average with alot of that being excreted in urine, feces, sweat and breath. It may not make you the finest person to be around. Diabetics get that disgusting odor about them and people know it with they are in that state. But, it is very effective short term.

The thing is is that its safety has not been established to follow it long term but in the Naval hospital study over a total fast, the level of potassium stayed within normal preventing cardiac arrythmias from occuring.

It is the most effective way to lose fat stores that has been demonstrated.
The mechanism is the prevention of glucose or sugars being made from protein intake or the use of protein breaking down from muscle. That prevents glucose affecting insulin secretion and like I said. Insulin is the antagonist to glucagon and overrides it thereby fucking the hormonal balance for optimal weight loss.
A diet with minimal calories is better than a diet with zero calories as long as it comes from a virtually 100% fat source. Those extra calories prevent the body going into 'starvation' mode and using muscle for energy (which turns to glucose through neoglucogenesis which affects insulin preventing glucagon from releasing fat stores)

Its a few steps away from making sense, but if you think it through, it make sense. A high fat low calorie diet is by science proven the best way to reduce fat stores.
Now, the problem is cheating and sticking to it, no one can. If you eat or cheat, it ruins the hormonal environment that the whole idea is striving towards. Most likely why no one talks about this at all b/c its not realistic
 
pintoca said:
BS!!!

Brothabill, prove this: Lestat is STR8

I dare you MFer, I DOUBLE DARE YOU!
bad bro material
 
BrothaBill said:
basically, when trying to replicate the research showing this effect. You would want to keep your 90% fat, 10% protein with zero carbs. This can be done with oils or even cream cheese.
Macadamia nuts will work b/c they are primarily fat, other nuts contain carbs so they dont work.

You dont want any "substance" that will increase "insulin" production. That includes protein or carbs and it also means you "HAVE" to have some calories in your diet to prevent you from using lean muscle to fuel you.

SO, the only thing left is dietary fat. That is where the macadamia nuts come in. They provide energy to utilize given you limit the amount to about 1000 calories. You cant eat 10,000 calories worth obviously or you'll gain weight like an artic bear preparing for hibernation.

The key is calorie deprivation coupled with the optimal hormonal environment to 'liberate' energy from the fat cells as a primary energy source.
Macadamia nuts is just one example of a high fat food with virtually nothing else. If you wanted optimal. then just take a small shot of oil per feeding with nothing else for ten days and you would lose the most weight.

The key thing is that insulin is nonexistant, the calorie deprivation is there and you have glucagon hormone running rampant over the usual insulin predominance. This will make you "pee" out ketones. Ketones are the byproducts of fat breakdown. Thats the way fat is used, fat goes to ketone bodies then burned but in excess, you will piss and shit out more energy than you use
Meaning, in the optimal fat fast diet, you will lose 1.5lbs on average with alot of that being excreted in urine, feces, sweat and breath. It may not make you the finest person to be around. Diabetics get that disgusting odor about them and people know it with they are in that state. But, it is very effective short term.

The thing is is that its safety has not been established to follow it long term but in the Naval hospital study over a total fast, the level of potassium stayed within normal preventing cardiac arrythmias from occuring.

It is the most effective way to lose fat stores that has been demonstrated.
The mechanism is the prevention of glucose or sugars being made from protein intake or the use of protein breaking down from muscle. That prevents glucose affecting insulin secretion and like I said. Insulin is the antagonist to glucagon and overrides it thereby fucking the hormonal balance for optimal weight loss.
A diet with minimal calories is better than a diet with zero calories as long as it comes from a virtually 100% fat source. Those extra calories prevent the body going into 'starvation' mode and using muscle for energy (which turns to glucose through neoglucogenesis which affects insulin preventing glucagon from releasing fat stores)

Its a few steps away from making sense, but if you think it through, it make sense. A high fat low calorie diet is by science proven the best way to reduce fat stores.
Now, the problem is cheating and sticking to it, no one can. If you eat or cheat, it ruins the hormonal environment that the whole idea is striving towards. Most likely why no one talks about this at all b/c its not realistic

So Im not dumb after all
 
solidg said:
So Im not dumb after all

well not in what you are stating b/c you stumbled on the best way to liberate fat stores.
I think the main thing is battling the 'lowfat' mentality that exists. In the insulin rich diets of the US then excess fat makes you fat but this is an exception as long as you are striving for hormonal dieting.

Its hard to give the advice though to do the low carb dieting b/c it teaches people to eat fats, cheese, bacon etc... Habits they carry back over once they inevitably go back to eating breads and pasta but only with a shitload more butter and fats added and become fat at an astonishing weight.

So my advice is if you want to do it, then do not reward the behavior with nuts or any fat that tastes good so that you dont learn to eat that way.
Take a shot of oil as a meal replacement for ten days and lose 15 or 20 pounds of fat. Then eat veggies and other healthy foods that dont contain processed foods (anything ground processed or sugars etc...)

You could cycle the fat fast as well while you exercise to utilize it but it would be mentally a tough thing to do
 
brothabill you are very well spoken as always. I love it when you drop loads of knowledge for us all.
 
BrothaBill said:
well not in what you are stating b/c you stumbled on the best way to liberate fat stores.
I think the main thing is battling the 'lowfat' mentality that exists. In the insulin rich diets of the US then excess fat makes you fat but this is an exception as long as you are striving for hormonal dieting.

Its hard to give the advice though to do the low carb dieting b/c it teaches people to eat fats, cheese, bacon etc... Habits they carry back over once they inevitably go back to eating breads and pasta but only with a shitload more butter and fats added and become fat at an astonishing weight.

So my advice is if you want to do it, then do not reward the behavior with nuts or any fat that tastes good so that you dont learn to eat that way.
Take a shot of oil as a meal replacement for ten days and lose 15 or 20 pounds of fat. Then eat veggies and other healthy foods that dont contain processed foods (anything ground processed or sugars etc...)

You could cycle the fat fast as well while you exercise to utilize it but it would be mentally a tough thing to do

what type of oil
 
solidg said:
what type of oil

any type of oil will work, olive oil, flax oil, even the macadamia nuts if you need to eat something, cream cheese. The key is five 200 calorie meals per day for ten days. It will work but I am sure that you wont be a happy camper lol
 
BrothaBill said:
any type of oil will work, olive oil, flax oil, even the macadamia nuts if you need to eat something, cream cheese. The key is five 200 calorie meals per day for ten days. It will work but I am sure that you wont be a happy camper lol

i have had a friend of mine who tried this and she lost about 12 kgs of fat in about 6 weeks she said. Its a tough diet to follow but she was happy. After that is made a change to her diet and incorporated different kinds of meats but never went back to eating carbs again. The only carbs she consumed was the ones you get in the porducts like milk or vegies.
 
juicedmohawk said:
God damn BB is an idiot, seriously.

just describing the diet and didnt make it up, its actually been around for thirty years or more and there is research that explains it, I am simply regurgitating information that can be found in metabolism books
 
spongebob said:
you might wanna verify this before the knobslobering begins.


:lmao:


sorry but I cannot stop laughing at your posts to Lestat, SB you are a funny guy
 
I still hope you don't plan on going on this diet. Wait, let me rephrase this. If you consider yourself athletic and you want to keep your muscle mass, barring you have any, I suggest you don't go on this diet.
 
sawastea said:
I still hope you don't plan on going on this diet. Wait, let me rephrase this. If you consider yourself athletic and you want to keep your muscle mass, barring you have any, I suggest you don't go on this diet.
:doc:
 
sawastea said:
I still hope you don't plan on going on this diet. Wait, let me rephrase this. If you consider yourself athletic and you want to keep your muscle mass, barring you have any, I suggest you don't go on this diet.

why? Frederick Benoit and Oakland Naval Hospital study showed that this diet of the 15 pounds of weight lost on average on the short term diet, only .5 pounds was lbm.
 
BULLSHIT!

I want to see when you're on a calorie deficit, bringing in 1000 calories a day for a MALE that weighs 180+ that the LBM over the short term was an insignificant loss. This bitch better be published with references. How were the triglycerades and LDL over this time frame?
 
sawastea said:
BULLSHIT!

I want to see when you're on a calorie deficit, bringing in 1000 calories a day for a MALE that weighs 180+ that the LBM over the short term was an insignificant loss. This bitch better be published with references. How were the triglycerades and LDL over this time frame?

do the research
 
Angel said:
what the hell has this thread turned into?

nothing on my end, dont blame the messenger, I didnt invent the diet, the research or discussions in metabolic books about this stuff. I certainly didnt send solidg in here to ask this question, lots of people are familiar with this type of diet
 
I've researched fat fast and a ton of other diets. Sure most work, but its temporary because people are always looking for a short cut. Do it for 6 weeks and then jump right back into their previous habits and the weight piles back on plus some because the body will over compensate.

You want to lose weight? You want to keep it off? Think of a 'diet' as a way of living not just limited amt of time that you have to modify your intake to lose X amt of lbs.

Just my .02
 
BrothaBill said:
do the research

You mention you're read it and it's published material. I just want to see it. I'm not going to waste my time on a catabolic diet. Post the references and that's it. Personally I'm against it, but I'm intrigued to read about it and to see their POV.
 
Erzulie said:
I've researched fat fast and a ton of other diets. Sure most work, but its temporary because people are always looking for a short cut. Do it for 6 weeks and then jump right back into their previous habits and the weight piles back on plus some because the body will over compensate.

You want to lose weight? You want to keep it off? Think of a 'diet' as a way of living not just limited amt of time that you have to modify your intake to lose X amt of lbs.

Just my .02

Yeah thats why I said its hard to recommend, first no one can follow it and the other low carb stuff just trains people to eat bacon, cheese, nuts, mayonaisse then they go back to high carbs and now they eat a ton more fats b/c they are used to it.
The fat fast is the most effective way to lose fat fast, just unsustainable, but the theory is correct
 
BrothaBill said:
Yeah thats why I said its hard to recommend, first no one can follow it and the other low carb stuff just trains people to eat bacon, cheese, nuts, mayonaisse then they go back to high carbs and now they eat a ton more fats b/c they are used to it.
The fat fast is the most effective way to lose fat fast, just unsustainable, but the theory is correct


I call those 'wedding diets' or 'vacation diets' LOL
 
CEASAR said:
Fat people diets.

And do you know what happens to fat people around here?


We eat em.


Alive.


I don't think eating fat people would be consisdered 'fat fast' .... any take on this BB? :verygood:
 
BrothaBill said:
why? Frederick Benoit and Oakland Naval Hospital study showed that this diet of the 15 pounds of weight lost on average on the short term diet, only .5 pounds was lbm.
How would this type of diet work for a diabetic?
 
Top Bottom