Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Lorazepam & Juice
- Thread starter ixhuntaxi
- Start date
rottweiler75
New member
http://www.mesomorphosis.com/articles/bahrke/bahrke03.htm
http://www.inhousepub.co.za/jdav5n2/JDAviewv1_v5n2.htm
http://www.mjm.mcgill.ca/issues/v06n01/v06p032/v06p032.pd
He states "caution' shoud be used, not that there a lethal mix. And your gram a more of test a week fact is BS. Just like insulin people have different degrees of receptor affinity for testerone or any hormone for that matter. Maybe you should do some more research before u make half ass comments or maybe switch to writing childrens books.
"I read it and its nonsense. I've used both and one had absolutely no effect on the other"
Do you have any clinical evidence of this?? or are we just supposed to take your word big guy? Those single person, double blinded, becase where taking a handful of drugs, controlled studies dont make the grade
"Those comments of Cy Wilsons, along with many comments he's made in the past, is pure nonsense"
taken from Tmag>> N Montana
("Veterinarian medications are not intended for human consumption!
The purity guidelines are not as stringent for a cow as they are for a human. They are designed for animal receptor sites which will also work in humans, but much of it is wasted due to the fact that the molecule is floating around looking to attach itself to something that isn't there.
A consequent topic of confusion for many people is; how much of a difference is the effect of one steroid compared to another? The simple truth of the matter is, not much. You see, the body doesn't have receptors specifically for "Deca" and others designed only for "anavar." They all work very similarly. The exotic stacks that people come up with are often a convoluted attempt to seem "scientific." Stacking two or more steroids is usually more effective due to a higher dosage than if one were to take a single steroid. The only advantage to stacking is to combine an oral with an injectable in order to provide both an "immediate hit" (provided by the oral) and a gradual taper." )
I guess we all same dumb shit sometimes, no need to knock the guy. I dont think your words are controversial, more like very careless.
http://www.inhousepub.co.za/jdav5n2/JDAviewv1_v5n2.htm
http://www.mjm.mcgill.ca/issues/v06n01/v06p032/v06p032.pd
He states "caution' shoud be used, not that there a lethal mix. And your gram a more of test a week fact is BS. Just like insulin people have different degrees of receptor affinity for testerone or any hormone for that matter. Maybe you should do some more research before u make half ass comments or maybe switch to writing childrens books.
"I read it and its nonsense. I've used both and one had absolutely no effect on the other"
Do you have any clinical evidence of this?? or are we just supposed to take your word big guy? Those single person, double blinded, becase where taking a handful of drugs, controlled studies dont make the grade
"Those comments of Cy Wilsons, along with many comments he's made in the past, is pure nonsense"
taken from Tmag>> N Montana
("Veterinarian medications are not intended for human consumption!
The purity guidelines are not as stringent for a cow as they are for a human. They are designed for animal receptor sites which will also work in humans, but much of it is wasted due to the fact that the molecule is floating around looking to attach itself to something that isn't there.
A consequent topic of confusion for many people is; how much of a difference is the effect of one steroid compared to another? The simple truth of the matter is, not much. You see, the body doesn't have receptors specifically for "Deca" and others designed only for "anavar." They all work very similarly. The exotic stacks that people come up with are often a convoluted attempt to seem "scientific." Stacking two or more steroids is usually more effective due to a higher dosage than if one were to take a single steroid. The only advantage to stacking is to combine an oral with an injectable in order to provide both an "immediate hit" (provided by the oral) and a gradual taper." )
I guess we all same dumb shit sometimes, no need to knock the guy. I dont think your words are controversial, more like very careless.
rottweiler75
New member
just dumb assumptions made in the past by Mr montano with no scientific evidence to back it up, taken from Tmag.
Similar threads
