Legal question about products for "research usage"

[gsxr600]

From what i understand about the law, you can aquire pretty much anything as long as you have a research liscence, thats how it is up here anyway.
dunno about the states, but some i dont think "this is for research puposes only, and in buying this product we assume that you have a research liscence." I dont think the law is that stupid and ignorant that bussiness men assume that the person on the other end does have a liscence. You can assume anything, with chemicals, but I'm no lawyer thats just my take on it.

 

[baza]

Maybe you need documentation about the research purposes it's intended for. Seems to easy to just say it's for research and get away with it. Maybe laboratories and universities can do it because they do legitimate research.

Good question bro.

Yeah, probably need something like that.
I emailed one company, and gave my business name, but they never responded.

 

[bayoumike]

more info please

 

[bayoumike]

here you go boys

strait from the man him self animal.,


believe it would be called the hobby chemistry law and anything you find at fisher or sigma or the like can be used by the HOBBY chemist however they like. If it is a business, the same laws applying to the big boys as in sale to other hobby chemists would apply.

I guess my boy Rick don't know everything, does he! There a few things he told me which were wrong and I think he still don't believe I'm not in jail, but fact is I was right and knew the law and knew they couldn't do shit all along.

That being said, Liquidex had some lawyers look into stuff as well, but it appears he may be having some 'trouble possibly related to operation headupsmokingass' as his no respond to email and even his autoreply no work for last 2 weeks at least and others have asked me that as well.

As I told him, it really don't matter WHAT you find or lawyers believe the law to say because some fedthug is gonna wake up one day and try to fuck you.

Even so, the research law can be thought of most easily in terms of yohimbine. Yohimbine is NOT a script until it is put into higher than 2.9mg tab/cap. At that point it would be illegal to sell if you capped it at 10mg or whatever, but if you don't put it into such a division, the responsibility then falls onto the end user and what they do with it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

[sermon_of_crockery]

exactly. any old person can fool around with chemistry in their basement. there's no law against it and it's basically honor system.

Now if you say there and dropped some liquidex into some OJ and drank it righ in front of a police officer, I don't know that that would be illegal either. But I wouldn't do it.

 

[Citruscide]

In order to obtain many of these chemicals... you must be a business... the FDA requires many of these companies to perform checking to make sure you are a corporation... I mean, you could incorporate...

Take DNP for example... if you had your own research company, you could order kilos and kilos of it from a chemical company... because, in power/crystal form, it is just that... a research chemical... it is when you start making it viable for human consumption (cutting it with corn starch or sugar and capping it) that it becomes "illegal".

there is some monitoring to this system... if you guy 200lbs of something... don't expect it to go unnoticed....

C-ditty

 

[baza]

I am incorporated, but still didn't get a reply, guess it's because "bodybuilding" is in the name, lol. Oh well.

 

[chemist]

Who would be at fault then if someone got caught with one of these chemicals, ie a vial of liquidex but it was clearly marked for research use only and not for human use? The buyer for not being licensed to possess said compound or the seller or neither since there has been no human use proven? Wouldn't it only be the buyer could be incriminated if there was more evidence to prove human usage of the product? I know RK for one claims that everything they sell is legal and I know they have an attorney and such so whats the deal? Anyone?

 

[doublebicep]

Still seems unclear. <bump>

 

[Mike DiMaggio]

We will address this once and for all later this week.