Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

LCD Televisions

beastboy

New member
Do these have the best picture quality? Do they have any cons?

Is there any benefits of a plasma over a rear projection HDTV LCD, other than the size of a plasma?
 
Ok, I want to answer but I don't know that much.

LCD are more expensive than the HDTV RP LCD's which are pretty new, I think as new as the DLP's.

I know the replacement bulbs for the dlp's and the hdtv rp lcd's run aroud 200 and change and last about 20,000 hours. I don't know how long the lcd's are supposed to last.

They are all supposed to be burn proof but I have heard a rumour that an LCD experienced burn in earlier this year.

I personally like the HDTV RP LCD's esp. the Sony XBR.

Now can you buy me one?
 
Plasma has superior depth portrayal.

I have an LCD screen in the kitchen, a regular plasma in the living room and an HD Plasma in the media room - there is a difference - if you like movies or watching sports it will show...

if you are casual viewer then LCD uis fine.
 
LCD televisions are both a tv and a computer monitor. That's all I know.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
Plasma has superior depth portrayal.

I have an LCD screen in the kitchen, a regular plasma in the living room and an HD Plasma in the media room - there is a difference - if you like movies or watching sports it will show...

if you are casual viewer then LCD uis fine.

You have to compare ALL the TV`s with HD tv and signals. I did`nt even know that plasma came in nonHD variety. I know that LCD comes with regular AND HD models.

They say the blacks on LCD is not as good as the Plasma as Matt is saying. But I`m sure with a top of the line LCD HD You `ll be very happy.

IMO If you don`t care about space/asthetics I would go with the Rear projection HD or DLP TV.
 
I think it's also a huge money thing. Plasma televisions are freaking obscenly expensive.
 
gonelifting said:


I did`nt even know that plasma came in nonHD variety. I know that LCD comes with regular AND HD models.

They say the blacks on LCD is not as good as the Plasma as Matt is saying. But I`m sure with a top of the line LCD HD You `ll be very happy.

IMO If you don`t care about space/asthetics I would go with the Rear projection HD or DLP TV.


You have to be careful when buying plasma.

There is your standard "plasma" 42: runs you about $3000 - $4000.

There is an HDTV-capable plasma - gimmick all the way, goes for like $5000.

The true HD plasma is about a $9000 or above purchase.

(These are 42" prices)

HDTV plasma is not HD plasma. Shady marketing....but there is a noticeable difference in quality.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:



You have to be careful when buying plasma.

There is your standard "plasma" 42: runs you about $3000 - $4000.

There is an HDTV-capable plasma - gimmick all the way, goes for like $5000.

The true HD plasma is about a $9000 or above purchase.

(These are 42" prices)

HDTV plasma is not HD plasma. Shady marketing....but there is a noticeable difference in quality.

With all else being equal like quality/manufacturer etc. You have to know what the lines of resolution are. Some sets are 480 780? 1080 1200+ There`s Enhanced TV, High Def TV etc.

If you`re getting an HD TV DEFINATELY go with the 1080 That`s it. period. Anything less is`nt HD I don`t think. It MAY be classified as such but I would`nt go with less.

Yes they can be expensive. That`s why I`m saying if you have the room and don`t care about the looks of a RPTV, Then go for it and get a HD rear projection.
 
Yeah..the RP LCD TV picture qualtiy was MUCH better than the plasma's I was looking at. The plasma's came in the regular, HDTV, and HDTV LCD (which may be the same as the LCD"s....not sure).

The RP LCD was 5K less than the PLasma and had just as good of a picture....I think I'll opt for that.
 
beastboy said:
The RP LCD was 5K less than the PLasma and had just as good of a picture....I think I'll opt for that.

whooot whooot - I'm right behind you, in like 2 years.
 
What size are you looking for beastboy? Any particular manufacturer in mind?
 
CheeseDick said:
The only thing Plasma are good for is for their flat structure

That and it's some pretty kewl bragging rights to be able to say that your tv is made from ghost-matter.
 
gonelifting said:
What size are you looking for beastboy? Any particular manufacturer in mind?

I like the Sony's...thinking the 50" will suit me just fine....although the 60" is tempting too....the 70" is out.

My wife said she is getting all new appliances before I get this.....we'll see...our appliances are only 4 years old.
 
plasmas look sweet, but their lifespan is 3-5 years. there's no way in hell i'm gonna blow that kind of cash on a tv that won't last past 5 years.

i have an lcd projection tv and only high definition video looks good on it. normal cable looks blocky because it has to reproduce the pixels (stretch the picture). dvd's and digital signals look great, but anything lower resolution looks worse than if it were on a standard tv.
 
beastboy said:
What about a satellite feed on the LCD?


Yes very interested in that as well.


Also beastboy if you have satellite, You gotta factor in another 1k on top of your Purchase price for wires and a receiver for the HD (if you don`t already have a HD tv) The receiver is anywhere from $300-$700 and then you`ll need component cables. Alot of people overlook these things.
 
gonelifting said:



Yes very interested in that as well.


Also beastboy if you have satellite, You gotta factor in another 1k on top of your Purchase price for wires and a receiver for the HD (if you don`t already have a HD tv) The receiver is anywhere from $300-$700 and then you`ll need component cables. Alot of people overlook these things.

Is that on any HDTV, LCD and PLasma, or just a plasma thing?
 
Any HD tv will need a receiver like that UNLESS it is built in the TV which is rare and not recommended. I think that`s what Mattsky was talking about. Those are the very expensive ones.

Unless You only use an antenna (an actual antenna that you put in your attic/roof) which everybody is using now. But that`s only for local HD channels.

Or if you have cable TV then you`ll just need their HD boxes(decoders).
 
gonelifting said:
Any HD tv will need a receiver like that UNLESS it is built in the TV which is rare and not recommended. I think that`s what Mattsky was talking about. Those are the very expensive ones.

I do recommend it as it is the superior picture, however, it is very expensive ($9000 and up). It is like looking out the window.

if you are furnishing something liek a media room I would get it. otherwise, it's just a luxury for the sake of luxury and probably not a wise purchase.

I don't know how a "regular" plasma set fitted with an HDTV receiver will compare to it.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


I do recommend it as it is the superior picture, however, it is very expensive ($9000 and up). It is like looking out the window.

if you are furnishing something liek a media room I would get it. otherwise, it's just a luxury for the sake of luxury and probably not a wise purchase.

I don't know how a "regular" plasma set fitted with an HDTV receiver will compare to it.

The "built in" HD TV`s just have the unit inside them. You can almost compare it to Seperates to an Audio/Video receiver on a home theater. With e "seperate" one You have a choice of the newest top of the line receivers that are changing week to week. If you get the TV you`re stuck with the unit inside So to speak.
Of course it`s a great picture though- $15000.

But that`s all it really is= unit inside. Maybe it`s customized for that particular TV, I don`t know. Also It makes a night and day difference to get the TV professionally calibrated if spending that much money. AT LEAST get the do-it-yourself calibration DVD like AVIA or ... forget the name (I have AVIA lol)

If you have a media room you can put all the components in a closet/behind a wall and just have small "targets" to aim the remote at that controls the whole setup. They may be called IR transmitters that plug into the equipment with a long cable to a 1/2 inch sized circle. They sometime use them for those glass cabinets people have for their stereos and the remote won`t go through the glass...
 
I just upgraded to the "hdtv" digital box that cox offers, It's cool but there are only 5 true HD channels available here =/ I'm running it into an HD plasma.. it's sick, but I would not drop the cash on HD until there are more true HD channels... the box also has to resize every channel to the resolution of your tv... so it's kinda weird.
 
i got a 42 inch plasma on the wall when i get my digi cam i will post some pics of da the place including my 8 feet by 6 feet mirror :)
 
beastboy said:
What about a satellite feed on the LCD?


OK after thinking about this question I come to the conclusion that Sat TV is difital already and like pigeonrat said, The picture looks good on it. Unless you have "normal" cable TV you should be fine. I hope. lol
 
Dial_tone said:
LCD televisions are both a tv and a computer monitor. That's all I know.

Actually the LCD in an LCD tv is a little different. They FOV and brightnest are much greater.
 
CipherLock said:
I think it's also a huge money thing. Plasma televisions are freaking obscenly expensive.


Another reason I wouldn't buy one anytime soon, they havn't been long enough in the market to actually prove how long the may last.
 
ZKaudio said:
the picture on digital cable is not that superior imo to analog cable... get an hd digital box.

Although I don`t have cable TV, I agree 100% that you should get an HD tuner if you get an HDTV.
 
Lcd's picture is great until there's movement on the screen.

There's something about fast movement and an lcd.

I can't remember the term for it..."ghosting" maybe.
 
LCDs will get there but they're still behind plasma imho. And, as far as I know, you can't get a 42" LCD. 37" is as big as they get right now. Just not big enough for a good movie experience.
 
Top Bottom