Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Is there a 'too late'?

RearNaked

New member
Simple question...when would it be considered 'too late' to treat test induced prolactin gynecomastia? Is there really any kind of timeframe, so to speak, where drugs would no longer be an option, only surgery?

I am posting this in regards to a thread I found from a couple months back, including this quote:

"The only non-surgical agents that have studies showing reduction of EXISTING gynecomastia are the serms Nolvaldex and raloxifene. Arimidex, which is an anti-a like Femera did nothing for reduction. Great for prevention."

Can anyone verify any truth behind this?
 
First of all there is no such thing as "test induced prolactin gynecomastia" or "prolactin induced gyno" for that matter. Research shows the gynecomastia from Tr3n and D3ca is from PROGESTERONE. Further, Test gynecomastia is from estrogen and once formed into cystic and nodular lumps, surgery is the only option.
 
RearNaked said:
Simple question...when would it be considered 'too late' to treat test induced prolactin gynecomastia? Is there really any kind of timeframe, so to speak, where drugs would no longer be an option, only surgery?

I am posting this in regards to a thread I found from a couple months back, including this quote:

"The only non-surgical agents that have studies showing reduction of EXISTING gynecomastia are the serms Nolvaldex and raloxifene. Arimidex, which is an anti-a like Femera did nothing for reduction. Great for prevention."

Can anyone verify any truth behind this?

I am sure you will get some good feedback from the bros on here but you may also want to pose this question to the new doc in town that BRR introduced as well. Doesn't hurt to have his opinion.
 
there is so much anecdotal evidence (myself included) about lumps being reabsorbed after taking femara and nolvaldex or some other combos...i think it something the we incorrectly self-diagnose (again, myself included--maybe fat nodules or some other wierd shit) or some of the mechanisms are yet unstudied.

i know i will try anything before i have it cut--proven or not.
 
todoveritas said:
First of all there is no such thing as "test induced prolactin gynecomastia" or "prolactin induced gynecomastia" for that matter. Research shows the gynecomastia from Tr3n and D3ca is from PROGESTERONE. Further, Test gynecomastia is from estrogen and once formed into cystic and nodular lumps, surgery is the only option.

my thoughts too
 
Ok, well what I mean is steroid induced then...I don't know. All I know is the excess test I took in, obviously converted to estrogen, and handily supplied me with soft fatty, deposits under both fucking nips. Not lumps, not water anymore, been off cycle for some tme now. Clearly it was from the test, and yes, solely my fault for not running any anti-e's! All I wanted to know is, if I can get finally get some of the aforementioned serms, there was any chance it may just fuck off, or if surgery was infact, the only option left. My apologies. Thank you.
 
i am in your situation too bro... a couple of good bros here told me to take
dostinex e3d .5mg
letro 2.25 mg ed
dermacrine sustain 5 pumps ed


and you could even throw in nolvadex.. i already have my orders placed just waiting for the stuff to come in
 
eddymerckx said:
there is so much anecdotal evidence (myself included) about lumps being reabsorbed after taking femara and nolvaldex or some other combos...i think it something the we incorrectly self-diagnose (again, myself included--maybe fat nodules or some other wierd shit) or some of the mechanisms are yet unstudied.

i know i will try anything before i have it cut--proven or not.


same here. Knife as the last resort
 
BLAZAY said:
i am in your situation too bro... a couple of good bros here told me to take
dostinex e3d .5mg
Femera - letrozole - 2.25 mg ed
dermacrine sustain 5 pumps ed


and you could even throw in nolvadex.. i already have my orders placed just waiting for the stuff to come in


samoth had a study posted about the effectivness of nolavaldex and if i remember it was more effective then we give it credit for--i 'll find it

agree st--any knife work is way down on the to do list--they had a staph problem at one of the hospitals around here--not good.
 
8and20 said:
I am sure you will get some good feedback from the bros on here but you may also want to pose this question to the new doc in town that BRR introduced as well. Doesn't hurt to have his opinion.
Good point bro.
 
I had a small lump and letro made it disappear at 2.5 mg ed for 2 weeks. Nolva may be more effective than we give it credit for but while there might be a lack of studies to prove it there is quite a lot of anecdotal evidence that letro WILL work if applied in the early stages.
 
its like male pattern baldness some get it some dont drugs make it happen quicker and like hair loss only thing that really helps is hair transplant same with this stuff surgery works everything else is maybe a temp fix.

not trying to be rude just wanna tell you how it is so you dont walk around throwing money away.

obviously this is all given you even have any issue at all
 
Top Bottom