Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Inception was not a very well done movie

nothing to really interpret bro. it's a filmmaking technique. the director doesn't even know the answer. they just do it to make people sit there and try to figure out what happened. It's like trying to analyze a beatles song.

...



I love you bro! thats precisely it!

Beatles parallel was excellent, trying to look deeper when no deepness is even there for it is all surface / image
 
I also agree with lack of development

I was personally left disappointed with the whole dream within a dream in a dream idea

if it were me, it would had some serious metaphysical/philosophical questions and scenarios

also they fucked up on the time dilation concept as well
 
I love you bro! thats precisely it!

Beatles parallel was excellent, trying to look deeper when no deepness is even there it all surface / image
it reminds me of when my uncles professor in a class that analyzed beatles songs would try to anaylze "I am the Walrus" and Lennon would reply that he didn't know what it was about. It's a great marketing scheme though.

I'd rather see Omega incept young glads mind and make him create some piano tunes about unicorns and happiness.
 
I also agree with lack of development of the dream within a dream in a dream

if it were me, it would had some serious metaphysical/philosophical questions and scenarios

also they fucked up on the time dilation concept as well
I've got the perfect film for you. Try and watch this one. It was produced by the Beatles manager Allen Klein and Lennon and Yoko put up the production money.

It has dwarves, unicorns, and it's like an LSD trip.

right up your alley omega! lolololol
 
nothing to really interpret bro. it's a filmmaking technique. the director doesn't even know the answer. they just do it to make people sit there and try to figure out what happened. It's like trying to analyze a beatles song.

nolan just made a film about a dream in a dream in a dream in a dream in a dream. If he would of spent more time making the characters interesting, believable, and more real, it would of been a better flick. It's thrown together without making any sense instead and the dialogue is downright shitty. There is nothing "real" about the film, and it isn't poetic like a Tarkovsky film, or even fun to watch.

And it tries to tell you in the end that some stupid, rich, ceo of some company's dad wants him to make "his own decisions" while making a stupid, insulting reference to the ending of "Citizen Kane"?

please......

If you want to watch an interesting time travel movie, check out "Open Your Eyes", "Donnie Darko", or even "Back to the Future".

A lot of you might love inception, and that's fine by me since we all have different tastes. I just get pissed off when people call it a classic......

agreed
 
reasoning in that they used only image and devices on a basic level only to carry the movie when the story should have been much deeper and nuanced

should have delved into the minds of people and been scary and insightful

Here is an example of a meh movie that had some great sequences into the mind of a murderer.......:




Inception should have gotten deeper like that
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom