Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
M
Mr.X
Guest
lanky said:
Of course you would, your latest post is nothing but a study.
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?p=6232643
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=6208600&postcount=1
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=484000
macrophage69alpha
New member
without casting dispersions, will state that have used all these compounds extensively (with the exception of nolva) and have been training consistently for about 19 years. So if you were intending those references in this direction, they would be innacurate.
T
tbolking
Guest
LOts of testosterone here!!
M
Mr.X
Guest
tbolking said:
Can't disagree with that
NYBodyguard
New member
lol so fuckin true
I responded in that thread "oh god" simply because I didnt know what else to write anymore
this is total nuts already
I responded in that thread "oh god" simply because I didnt know what else to write anymore
this is total nuts already
used2juice
New member
Don't lie Mr. X, you just started this because the DaVinci Code movie was coming out and you needed something to promote your theory that the templar knights are infact responsible for the worldwide pharmaceutical conspiracy. 
macrophage69alpha
New member
interesting theory... well amusing at least 
B
basskiller
Guest
My take on studies.
What happens is Company A hires another research lab independent of them to test the product on their target. This could be any number of things. Now, here is where the crap really pisses me off. Because Company A is funding the research at the independent research lab, they control if and when that study becomes public. If it ever does, Yea that’s right, they have the option of not submitting that study if the findings do not work for the benefit of the product.
Here is the really sad part. Hundreds of study could be performed by legitimate unbiased labs and 99% of them could have the findings that the drug in question is bad for you. Only one of the studies having some benefit of said product. Because Company A funded those studies, they own the rights to them. Those 99% will never see the light of day nor does Company A have the obligation to even tell you about them. No one in the public eye will ever see them.
All you hear about is that one study. Now this doesn't make the study false by any means. What it means is that Company A has dropped a ton of money on this product and has to try and recoup it somehow. This comes at your expense because you haven’t a clue about the other studies. Company A will most likely have a disclaimer on the bottle. This may cause this that or the other. When I the possibility could be 1 in 100 people will suffer from one of the serious side effects listed. If the company were to let you know that, you would not chance taking it. So you get a watered down disclaimer.
Sorry for taking this a bit further I may sound a bit jaded in this post. I just think you have to look for more than just studies
And this has absolutely no bearing on any study posted Just some thoughts of a rambling old man
What happens is Company A hires another research lab independent of them to test the product on their target. This could be any number of things. Now, here is where the crap really pisses me off. Because Company A is funding the research at the independent research lab, they control if and when that study becomes public. If it ever does, Yea that’s right, they have the option of not submitting that study if the findings do not work for the benefit of the product.
Here is the really sad part. Hundreds of study could be performed by legitimate unbiased labs and 99% of them could have the findings that the drug in question is bad for you. Only one of the studies having some benefit of said product. Because Company A funded those studies, they own the rights to them. Those 99% will never see the light of day nor does Company A have the obligation to even tell you about them. No one in the public eye will ever see them.
All you hear about is that one study. Now this doesn't make the study false by any means. What it means is that Company A has dropped a ton of money on this product and has to try and recoup it somehow. This comes at your expense because you haven’t a clue about the other studies. Company A will most likely have a disclaimer on the bottle. This may cause this that or the other. When I the possibility could be 1 in 100 people will suffer from one of the serious side effects listed. If the company were to let you know that, you would not chance taking it. So you get a watered down disclaimer.
Sorry for taking this a bit further I may sound a bit jaded in this post. I just think you have to look for more than just studies
And this has absolutely no bearing on any study posted Just some thoughts of a rambling old man
Similar threads
