Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
Any ladies here have first hand experience with it? I just started reading up on it. I would like to hear any results or experience with it. Also what is the female dosage is for it.
Igf-1
- Thread starter superqt4u2nv
- Start date
Moved you dop I posted it on the wrong board.Lumberg said:
Sassy? Anyone?
Really no one? Sassy girl help a sista out 
Sassy69
New member
Hey QT --- I beat my brains on this one --- all I know about IGF-1 is that it is a precursor to GH in your body.. For example, if you want to get your GH tested (amount), they measure the IGF-1 because it is less transient than the actual GH.
As a "supp", I've never heard of women using it. Some guys have gotten nothing out of it, some have gotten amazing results. Generally I've heard for the money, use something different.
As a "supp", I've never heard of women using it. Some guys have gotten nothing out of it, some have gotten amazing results. Generally I've heard for the money, use something different.
It is cheaper then GH suppse to be faster acting and equal to it in terms of fat burning. I am 25 so minium GH cycle would be 6 months to get the value out it. (6 months of GH = a very poor QT LOL) I read a # of remarks about it being painful to inject.Sassy69 said:
I was thinking of trying to add something to my var cycle but I am thinking it will probably just be var. Then clen and var for the last half of the cycle. Possibly T3 if I get below 12%.
My Gf has used IGF she is 22 10% BF and 140lbs. After using it for 4 months she noticed some muscle building properties but not a whole lot but that b/c I think she didnt use it in a high enough dosage. She did loss alot of fat on it though. She also used anavar of and on at 15mg day. By the way ity is more expensive than HGH. It is idel to run IGF with HGH at the same time.
GH causes the liver to produce IGF-I that is released in circulation, GH is the precusor to IGF-I so to speak. Increasing circulating IGF-I will have little effect on muscle specifically. Causes somatic growth (whole body), but not muscle specific. Only direct, constant infusion into a muscle will have any effect.
Personally, given what we know about IGF-I and breast cancer, any female that's injecting IGF-I is really increasing her long-term risk of breast cancer. If you're using the R form that doesn't bind with regulator binding proteins, its even worse.
Ox is a far safer and more effective way to increase muscle mass. AAS work in part through the IGF system, but specifically at the muscle level.
W6
Personally, given what we know about IGF-I and breast cancer, any female that's injecting IGF-I is really increasing her long-term risk of breast cancer. If you're using the R form that doesn't bind with regulator binding proteins, its even worse.
Ox is a far safer and more effective way to increase muscle mass. AAS work in part through the IGF system, but specifically at the muscle level.
W6
Similar threads
