Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below VicTusDeuS
New member
You think we'll go all out and just destroy everything in the middle east?
If we get attacked with a suitcase nuke...
- Thread starter VicTusDeuS
- Start date
SofaGeorge
New member
According to rumor there are some 20 suitcase nukes missing. If one is used I pretty well guarantee you every Arab nation that supports terroism will see mass exodus of their citizens as they await nuke retaliation.
Better than nuking them would be to let 20 million of them sit in refugee camp squalor for a couple years.
Better than nuking them would be to let 20 million of them sit in refugee camp squalor for a couple years.
---if they use one, it would be used to destroy israel----If they have there hands on so many, it wouldn't be to hard to use 5 or six of them in all corners of there country...and we couldn't do a thing about it----Who are we going to go after? who is going to let us drop nukes on ghosts----russia-china would never allow us to do such a thing without something happening to us---Israel is in a shitty postion and have been hanging on by a thread for a long time---If we go into Iraq and try to take over the government and bring a democracy to Iraq, Israel is going to the target for the arabs of all the middle east---but we may not have a choice----peace
I think a large portion of the Middle East would be a target of U.S. aggression if a suitcase nuke was successfully deployed.
I just don't see this happening. They should be more than content with the aftermath of 9/11.
The world has always carried on despite dire predictions od imminent failure. I suspect it will continue to do so.
I am far more concerned about internal collapse in the wake of gross erosion of values.
I just don't see this happening. They should be more than content with the aftermath of 9/11.
The world has always carried on despite dire predictions od imminent failure. I suspect it will continue to do so.
I am far more concerned about internal collapse in the wake of gross erosion of values.
Wombat said:
i think this is far more likely too....especially if saddam has developed dirty nukes already
a nuclear response might be used.....but the US has bombed libya before, under the reagan administration after an attack on the US, only to find out later that syria was responsible
if nuclear retaliation was used the planning ehind it would be immense, i suspect by which time the terrorists would have left
It wouldn't take long. Our strategic planners began developing contingency paybacks in September.danielson said:
i think this is far more likely too....especially if saddam has developed dirty nukes already
a nuclear response might be used.....but the US has bombed libya before, under the reagan administration after an attack on the US, only to find out later that syria was responsible
if nuclear retaliation was used the planning ehind it would be immense, i suspect by which time the terrorists would have left
I would be surprised is we had not redirected part of our nuclear arsenal towards key targets in the Middle East.
They simply should no goad the U.S. any further. To do so is suicide. But they like suicide because they are crazy. Interesting situation.
G
Golfer18--old
Guest
Wombat said:
Ryan is a piece of shit.
