perkele said:USA will be responsible for starting the World War III so thanks USA and Bush! Brilliant work. Still Germany will lead 2-1.
![]()
Norman Bates said:Who would fight for the sake of Iraq? Iran? Saudi-Arabia? i don´t think so.
That's exactly the attitude that is pissing the rest of the world off.TxArmyGuy said:...Whether you like it or not, We ARE the BIG BOY on the Block and if you dont like it tough shit ...
john937 said:
That's exactly the attitude that is pissing the rest of the world off.
Nobody likes a bully.
Norman Bates said:Who would fight for the sake of Iraq? Iran? Saudi-Arabia? i don´t think so.
TxArmyGuy said:
If it wasn't for the USA many nations around the world would be living under Dictatorships and wouldn't have the right to BITCH like you have on this Forum
2Thick said:
You seem to forget (or not even know) that the US and the UK are responsible for placing most of the dictators into power in the first place.
It seems like I spend most of my time on this board educating people about history.
Lift Chief said:
It was for a good reason, although in retrospect wasn't the best thing to do. We just try to bring stability to a region... hard to fault us for that.
2Thick said:
I do not blame you for standing up for the USA. You are constantly bombarded with propaganda and seldom have any objective or outside news sources to gain a differing point of view.
But to make it simple, the dictators were often put in place to secure some sort of advantage for the current administration (both Democratic and Republican). A current example is Iraq and its oil revenues that will benefit certain members of the administration.
crazeensleepee said:Silly question but are you by chance caucasion Lift Chief?
Lift Chief said:
I agree that a big part of the reason we put people into power would be for the advantages it affords to the current administration... but- in the process we do bring a certain level of stability to a region, which, even with a bad dictator is better than no law at all.
A dictator is always better than clashing warlords from what i've read...
crazeensleepee said:Just the question or is this thread supposed to be sarcastic?
john937 said:
That's exactly the attitude that is pissing the rest of the world off.
Nobody likes a bully.
MassiveGunz said:Your welcome.
Sadam isnt stacked so hes getting whacked bro.
MortyJackson said:
Its not the attitude its the fact that we are better than them.
2Thick said:
You are pretty ignorant for a German.
You should know that Germany (along with 3/4 of Europe) would never allow anyone to attack Iran.
UpperTone said:Could someone, who is against war with Iraq, please tell me how they would (seriously. not a "fuck'm all" response) like to see countries like Iraq & N. Korea dealt with?
Lift Chief said:
World War 3 huh? Can't see this turning into a global conflict myself...
Norman Bates said:
I meant that Iran is unlikely to fight with Iraq against the USA.
What did you think that i meant?
UpperTone said:Could someone, who is against war with Iraq, please tell me how they would (seriously. not a "fuck'm all" response) like to see countries like Iraq & N. Korea dealt with?
I'd like to see something beyond "The US has propped up these regimes" or "The US is bad... Bush sucks" etc...
Thank you
KAYNE said:YOU SHOULD THANK SUDDAM HUSSEIN.
KAYNE
perkele said:
Actually no. Iraq is not planning to attact USA.
So what if Iraq has biological and chemical weapons? USA has those too, among many other countries.
Every country should have few nukes to play with.
MortyJackson said:
Yeah, and we should all live in fear in case he uses them or sells them to terrorists. The job of the United States Government is to protect Americans. Fairness with other countries doesnt matter at all.
perkele said:
Am I right, every guy in USA has the right to own a gun? Even people who shouldn't have the right (for the safety of others).
Life is a bitch.
Do you really live in fear? I think you should be more worried about your neighbor than Saddam and Iraq. Blaim you goverment if it fucks with muslims and then you must live in fear. Look at the map. No country is as safe as USA.
perkele said:
Am I right, every guy in USA has the right to own a gun? Even people who shouldn't have the right (for the safety of others).
Life is a bitch.
Do you really live in fear? I think you should be more worried about your neighbor than Saddam and Iraq. Blaim you goverment if it fucks with muslims and then you must live in fear. Look at the map. No country is as safe as USA.
MortyJackson said:
And we would like to keep it that way.
The blame isnt on our government for fucking with the Muslims. The blame is on the Muslims for being terrorists.
VicTusDeuS said:
No your not right...Criminals and Insane people cannot own guns Saddam is both a Criminal and insane and he shouldnt have access to those types of weapons.
perkele said:
If they would have nukes just like US then they would not need to fly into skyscrapers. Nuke against nuke, fair play.
If you'll start fucking with me of course I'm gonna kick our ass. Why wouldn't muslims do the same with US gov.
Fuck we all know it's about OIL!!!!!!
MortyJackson said:
First of all who gives a shit about fair play when it comes to national security.

perkele said:
That's probably what the fucking terrorists yelled when he flew into the WTC.
Yeah, who gives a shit about fair play.
I think every country in the world should unite and then together attact USA, and then give 50% to Mexico and another 50% to Canada. Problems solved.![]()
perkele said:
I think every country in the world should unite and then together attact USA, and then give 50% to Mexico and another 50% to Canada. Problems solved.![]()
MortyJackson said:
I dont give a shit what the terrorists yelled when they flew into the WTC but i bet it was more like allah akbar. Just because we have nukes doesnt mean that we should allow every terrorist nation to have them. Your idea of fairness would equal suicide to civilized people.
perkele said:
If every muslim country would have few nukes then we would never have started messing with them in the first place.
"Let them unite against us and see how easily we wipe the fucking floor with them."
LOL!
There would be as many nukes in the other side and over 30 times more people and soldiers.
KAYNE said:
HOW ABOUT SOME PISSED OFF SF ARMY GUYS ATTACK YOUR MOMS!!! THEY CAN GANG RAPE HER WITH AN OLD SPLINTERY BROOMSTICK THEN RIP HER PUSSY IN HALF GIVING 50% TO A FUCKING TOWEL HEAD PRISONER IN GUANTANAMO BAY, AND THE OTHER 50% TO A STRAY DOG THAT IS DYING OF HUNGER. PROBLEM SOLVED!!!
ACTUALLY, THAT SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED BEFORE YOUR STUPID FUCKING FATHER INJECTED HIS SPERM INTO YOUR STUPID FUCKING MOTHER WITH THE END RESULT BEING YOU. NEITHER ONE OF THEM HAD ENOUGH SENSE TO EITHER PULL OUT AND MAKE YOU A WET SPOT ON THE DIRT FLOOR THEY WERE FUCKING ON OR TO SWALLOW!!! FUCKING MORON.
KAYNE
perkele said:
Give it up Kayne, you talk like 15 year old. You'll probably be the next president.
![]()
MortyJackson said:
Why would we want to give them nukes which would reduce our own options on what to do? Also when exactly did we start messing with them?
KAYNE said:
YOU BETTER HOPE I NVR BECOME PRESIDENT....YOUR COUNTRY WOULD CEASE TO EXIST IF I WERE.
perkele said:
I don't know why USA would want to give them nukes but I would like that every fucking country would have at least one to play with. Like I said, fair play.
USA has had his fingers around middle east since fucking 60/70's.
MortyJackson said:
Are you serious or are you just fucking around? It wouldnt be "fair" to give every nation some nukes because they would not be responsible with them. So while one country is peaceful and has it only if absolutely necessary another country (like Iraq) would just nuke them first killing thousands of their innocent people. So its not fair because not all countries are the same.
Regardless the idea of fairness in war is completely retarded. We wouldnt want our enemies to have comparable weapons because we want to have as little casualties as possible. The more I think about this the more i think you must be fucking around.
perkele said:
I'm not fucking around. Of course I know that muslim country with nuke ain't as safe choice as some democratic country like Sweden, France, Australia would be but that's life.
One nuke would totally destroy Iraq but it wouldn't destroy US. It sure would hurt little bit.
Would you let Scandinavian countries have nukes? Or would you start fear them too?
MassiveGunz said:Your welcome.
Sadam isnt stacked so hes getting whacked bro.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










