Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

I wanna thank USA!!!

perkele

New member
Platinum
USA will be responsible for starting the World War III so thanks USA and Bush! Brilliant work. Still Germany will lead 2-1.

:D
 
perkele said:
USA will be responsible for starting the World War III so thanks USA and Bush! Brilliant work. Still Germany will lead 2-1.

:D

World War 3 huh? Can't see this turning into a global conflict myself...
 
There's not going to be another "world war" because of something we like to call nuclear weapons... mutually assured destruction.
 
Norman Bates said:
Who would fight for the sake of Iraq? Iran? Saudi-Arabia? i don´t think so.


Muslims you idiot, muslims.

Those idiots are always ready to fly into skyscrapers if I may remind you.

Don't forget what can happen with North Korea, and that leads to problems with China and Russia. And let's not forget that little by little every country starts hating USA more and more. Actually they already do.


And then Canada will strike! :D
 
You are right, those nasty towel-heads are propably sending their mighty fleet of 20 fisher-boats to invade the USA even as we speak. Better act now. :D
 
Hey Kiss my ass you twerp

If it wasn't for the USA many nations around the world would be living under Dictatorships and wouldn't have the right to BITCH like you have on this Forum

Whether you like it or not, We ARE the BIG BOY on the Block and if you dont like it tough shit cause we aren't going anywhere.
 
TxArmyGuy said:
...Whether you like it or not, We ARE the BIG BOY on the Block and if you dont like it tough shit ...
That's exactly the attitude that is pissing the rest of the world off.
Nobody likes a bully.
 
TxArmyGuy said:


If it wasn't for the USA many nations around the world would be living under Dictatorships and wouldn't have the right to BITCH like you have on this Forum

You seem to forget (or not even know) that the US and the UK are responsible for placing most of the dictators into power in the first place.

It seems like I spend most of my time on this board educating people about history.
 
2Thick said:


You seem to forget (or not even know) that the US and the UK are responsible for placing most of the dictators into power in the first place.

It seems like I spend most of my time on this board educating people about history.

It was for a good reason, although in retrospect wasn't the best thing to do. We just try to bring stability to a region... hard to fault us for that.

It's very easy to look back and say: wow, what a dumb idea that was... but it's almost impossible to see what will happen at the time.
 
Lift Chief said:


It was for a good reason, although in retrospect wasn't the best thing to do. We just try to bring stability to a region... hard to fault us for that.

I do not blame you for standing up for the USA. You are constantly bombarded with propaganda and seldom have any objective or outside news sources to gain a differing point of view.

But to make it simple, the dictators were often put in place to secure some sort of advantage for the current administration (both Democratic and Republican). A current example is Iraq and its oil revenues that will benefit certain members of the administration.
 
2Thick said:


I do not blame you for standing up for the USA. You are constantly bombarded with propaganda and seldom have any objective or outside news sources to gain a differing point of view.

But to make it simple, the dictators were often put in place to secure some sort of advantage for the current administration (both Democratic and Republican). A current example is Iraq and its oil revenues that will benefit certain members of the administration.

I agree that a big part of the reason we put people into power would be for the advantages it affords to the current administration... but- in the process we do bring a certain level of stability to a region, which, even with a bad dictator is better than no law at all.

A dictator is always better than clashing warlords from what i've read...
 
Lift Chief said:


I agree that a big part of the reason we put people into power would be for the advantages it affords to the current administration... but- in the process we do bring a certain level of stability to a region, which, even with a bad dictator is better than no law at all.

A dictator is always better than clashing warlords from what i've read...

Yes, you are correct that a totalitarian government is sometimes necessary to bring order into a chaotic nation, but dictators lose their usefulness once they have restored order.
 
john937 said:

That's exactly the attitude that is pissing the rest of the world off.
Nobody likes a bully.

Its not the attitude its the fact that we are better than them. Its jealous. The other nations have even worse attitudes but you dont see everyone bitching about them because they are pussies. We are only guilty of being too damn good.
 
I didn't read a post on here... but the title I did... and I must say.

You're welcome.

C-ditty
 
2Thick said:


You are pretty ignorant for a German.

You should know that Germany (along with 3/4 of Europe) would never allow anyone to attack Iran.

I meant that Iran is unlikely to fight with Iraq against the USA.
What did you think that i meant?
 
Could someone, who is against war with Iraq, please tell me how they would (seriously. not a "fuck'm all" response) like to see countries like Iraq & N. Korea dealt with?

I'd like to see something beyond "The US has propped up these regimes" or "The US is bad... Bush sucks" etc...

Thank you
 
UpperTone said:
Could someone, who is against war with Iraq, please tell me how they would (seriously. not a "fuck'm all" response) like to see countries like Iraq & N. Korea dealt with?

Apparently we are supposed to keep asking them nicely not to build nukes and if they dont comply then ask some more. Repeat process until you get blowed up.
 
Re: Re: I wanna thank USA!!!

Lift Chief said:


World War 3 huh? Can't see this turning into a global conflict myself...

Remember, world war 1 started from a single gunshot.


Germany was on its knees before 1930s. Nobody could imagine that it could become so strong.


Remember that US can loose all of its economic prowess in matter of seconds.
 
UpperTone said:
Could someone, who is against war with Iraq, please tell me how they would (seriously. not a "fuck'm all" response) like to see countries like Iraq & N. Korea dealt with?

I'd like to see something beyond "The US has propped up these regimes" or "The US is bad... Bush sucks" etc...

Thank you

Nobody wants to give this a try?
 
Come on! Surely with all the complaining peaceniks have been doing, they can come up with at least a few 'great' options for dealing with the current situation.
 
KAYNE said:
YOU SHOULD THANK SUDDAM HUSSEIN.




KAYNE

Actually no. Iraq is not planning to attact USA.

So what if Iraq has biological and chemical weapons? USA has those too, among many other countries.

Every country should have few nukes to play with.
 
perkele said:


Actually no. Iraq is not planning to attact USA.

So what if Iraq has biological and chemical weapons? USA has those too, among many other countries.

Every country should have few nukes to play with.

Yeah, and we should all live in fear in case he uses them or sells them to terrorists. The job of the United States Government is to protect Americans. Fairness with other countries doesnt matter at all.
 
MortyJackson said:


Yeah, and we should all live in fear in case he uses them or sells them to terrorists. The job of the United States Government is to protect Americans. Fairness with other countries doesnt matter at all.


Am I right, every guy in USA has the right to own a gun? Even people who shouldn't have the right (for the safety of others).
Life is a bitch.

Do you really live in fear? I think you should be more worried about your neighbor than Saddam and Iraq. Blaim you goverment if it fucks with muslims and then you must live in fear. Look at the map. No country is as safe as USA.
 
perkele said:



Am I right, every guy in USA has the right to own a gun? Even people who shouldn't have the right (for the safety of others).
Life is a bitch.

Do you really live in fear? I think you should be more worried about your neighbor than Saddam and Iraq. Blaim you goverment if it fucks with muslims and then you must live in fear. Look at the map. No country is as safe as USA.

And we would like to keep it that way.

The blame isnt on our government for fucking with the Muslims. The blame is on the Muslims for being terrorists.
 
perkele said:



Am I right, every guy in USA has the right to own a gun? Even people who shouldn't have the right (for the safety of others).
Life is a bitch.

Do you really live in fear? I think you should be more worried about your neighbor than Saddam and Iraq. Blaim you goverment if it fucks with muslims and then you must live in fear. Look at the map. No country is as safe as USA.



No your not right...Criminals and Insane people cannot own guns Saddam is both a Criminal and insane and he shouldnt have access to those types of weapons.
 
MortyJackson said:


And we would like to keep it that way.

The blame isnt on our government for fucking with the Muslims. The blame is on the Muslims for being terrorists.


If they would have nukes just like US then they would not need to fly into skyscrapers. Nuke against nuke, fair play.


If you'll start fucking with me of course I'm gonna kick our ass. Why wouldn't muslims do the same with US gov.

Fuck we all know it's about OIL!!!!!!
 
VicTusDeuS said:




No your not right...Criminals and Insane people cannot own guns Saddam is both a Criminal and insane and he shouldnt have access to those types of weapons.

He's not a criminal, he might be little bit insane but that goes with 90% of board members here (me included).

If Saddam is a criminal then why ain't all former US presidents in jail? I think they're responsible for hundeds of innocent people losing their lifes.
 
perkele said:



If they would have nukes just like US then they would not need to fly into skyscrapers. Nuke against nuke, fair play.


If you'll start fucking with me of course I'm gonna kick our ass. Why wouldn't muslims do the same with US gov.

Fuck we all know it's about OIL!!!!!!

First of all who gives a shit about fair play when it comes to national security. Just because we have something doesnt mean we allow everyone else to have it out of fairness.

Also its typical for a liberal to say its about oil. Thats what they said about the first gulf war. Unfortunately I didnt notice any oil benefits of that war and I am doubtful that we will see anything from this war either.
 
The first gulf war was about to keep Hussein from gaining too much influence on the oil production. It just restored the status quo.

If the war was about WMD, why can´t they find any, why does Bush have to come up with fabricated evidence like the first dossier and now this plagiarized 12 year old report?

This war is not about WMD.
 
MortyJackson said:


First of all who gives a shit about fair play when it comes to national security.

That's probably what the fucking terrorists yelled when he flew into the WTC.

Yeah, who gives a shit about fair play.

I think every country in the world should unite and then together attact USA, and then give 50% to Mexico and another 50% to Canada. Problems solved. :fro:
 
perkele said:


That's probably what the fucking terrorists yelled when he flew into the WTC.

Yeah, who gives a shit about fair play.

I think every country in the world should unite and then together attact USA, and then give 50% to Mexico and another 50% to Canada. Problems solved. :fro:

Let them unite against us and see how easily we wipe the fucking floor with them.

I dont give a shit what the terrorists yelled when they flew into the WTC but i bet it was more like allah akbar. Just because we have nukes doesnt mean that we should allow every terrorist nation to have them. Your idea of fairness would equal suicide to civilized people.
 
perkele said:



I think every country in the world should unite and then together attact USA, and then give 50% to Mexico and another 50% to Canada. Problems solved. :fro:

HOW ABOUT SOME PISSED OFF SF ARMY GUYS ATTACK YOUR MOMS!!! THEY CAN GANG RAPE HER WITH AN OLD SPLINTERY BROOMSTICK THEN RIP HER PUSSY IN HALF GIVING 50% TO A FUCKING TOWEL HEAD PRISONER IN GUANTANAMO BAY, AND THE OTHER 50% TO A STRAY DOG THAT IS DYING OF HUNGER. PROBLEM SOLVED!!!

ACTUALLY, THAT SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED BEFORE YOUR STUPID FUCKING FATHER INJECTED HIS SPERM INTO YOUR STUPID FUCKING MOTHER WITH THE END RESULT BEING YOU. NEITHER ONE OF THEM HAD ENOUGH SENSE TO EITHER PULL OUT AND MAKE YOU A WET SPOT ON THE DIRT FLOOR THEY WERE FUCKING ON OR TO SWALLOW!!! FUCKING MORON.



KAYNE
 
MortyJackson said:

I dont give a shit what the terrorists yelled when they flew into the WTC but i bet it was more like allah akbar. Just because we have nukes doesnt mean that we should allow every terrorist nation to have them. Your idea of fairness would equal suicide to civilized people.


If every muslim country would have few nukes then we would never have started messing with them in the first place.


"Let them unite against us and see how easily we wipe the fucking floor with them."

LOL!

There would be as many nukes in the other side and over 30 times more people and soldiers.
 
perkele said:



If every muslim country would have few nukes then we would never have started messing with them in the first place.


"Let them unite against us and see how easily we wipe the fucking floor with them."

LOL!

There would be as many nukes in the other side and over 30 times more people and soldiers.

1. Why would we want to give them nukes which would reduce our own options on what to do? Also when exactly did we start messing with them?

2. Laugh all you want, the United States military would hand everyone else their asses.
 
KAYNE said:


HOW ABOUT SOME PISSED OFF SF ARMY GUYS ATTACK YOUR MOMS!!! THEY CAN GANG RAPE HER WITH AN OLD SPLINTERY BROOMSTICK THEN RIP HER PUSSY IN HALF GIVING 50% TO A FUCKING TOWEL HEAD PRISONER IN GUANTANAMO BAY, AND THE OTHER 50% TO A STRAY DOG THAT IS DYING OF HUNGER. PROBLEM SOLVED!!!

ACTUALLY, THAT SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED BEFORE YOUR STUPID FUCKING FATHER INJECTED HIS SPERM INTO YOUR STUPID FUCKING MOTHER WITH THE END RESULT BEING YOU. NEITHER ONE OF THEM HAD ENOUGH SENSE TO EITHER PULL OUT AND MAKE YOU A WET SPOT ON THE DIRT FLOOR THEY WERE FUCKING ON OR TO SWALLOW!!! FUCKING MORON.



KAYNE


Give it up Kayne, you talk like 15 year old. You'll probably be the next president.


:D
 
perkele said:



Give it up Kayne, you talk like 15 year old. You'll probably be the next president.


:D


YOU BETTER HOPE I NVR BECOME PRESIDENT....YOUR COUNTRY WOULD CEASE TO EXIST IF I WERE.

AS FOR TALKING LIKE A 15 YEAR OLD...GET IT RIGHT, I'M 12, NOT 15. PRICK.




KAYNE
 
MortyJackson said:


Why would we want to give them nukes which would reduce our own options on what to do? Also when exactly did we start messing with them?



I don't know why USA would want to give them nukes but I would like that every fucking country would have at least one to play with. Like I said, fair play.

USA has had his fingers around middle east since fucking 60/70's.
 
perkele said:



I don't know why USA would want to give them nukes but I would like that every fucking country would have at least one to play with. Like I said, fair play.

USA has had his fingers around middle east since fucking 60/70's.

Are you serious or are you just fucking around? It wouldnt be "fair" to give every nation some nukes because they would not be responsible with them. So while one country is peaceful and has it only if absolutely necessary another country (like Iraq) would just nuke them first killing thousands of their innocent people. So its not fair because not all countries are the same.

Regardless the idea of fairness in war is completely retarded. We wouldnt want our enemies to have comparable weapons because we want to have as little casualties as possible. The more I think about this the more i think you must be fucking around.
 
MortyJackson said:


Are you serious or are you just fucking around? It wouldnt be "fair" to give every nation some nukes because they would not be responsible with them. So while one country is peaceful and has it only if absolutely necessary another country (like Iraq) would just nuke them first killing thousands of their innocent people. So its not fair because not all countries are the same.

Regardless the idea of fairness in war is completely retarded. We wouldnt want our enemies to have comparable weapons because we want to have as little casualties as possible. The more I think about this the more i think you must be fucking around.

I'm not fucking around. Of course I know that muslim country with nuke ain't as safe choice as some democratic country like Sweden, France, Australia would be but that's life.

One nuke would totally destroy Iraq but it wouldn't destroy US. It sure would hurt little bit.

Would you let Scandinavian countries have nukes? Or would you start fear them too?
 
perkele said:


I'm not fucking around. Of course I know that muslim country with nuke ain't as safe choice as some democratic country like Sweden, France, Australia would be but that's life.

One nuke would totally destroy Iraq but it wouldn't destroy US. It sure would hurt little bit.

Would you let Scandinavian countries have nukes? Or would you start fear them too?

Show us a Scandinavian country that would pose us a threat even if they had a nuke???Now show us a Muslim Nation that wouldn't pose us a threat if they had Nukes.

We are insane to allow Pakistan to continue to have such weapons...Only decent thing is they are more concerned with the Hindu's finally having enough of their shit and waiting for India to wipe them out
 
It seems that people only live on this plant to hate eachother.

I thought that globalization has showed promise over the years.

Maybe one day, the world can unite and iron out the differences.
 
Top Bottom