I ruined someone's thanksgiving for life!

[XBiker]

ITS THE SAME THING I HAVE BEEN TELLING YOU SINCE YOU STARTED SWEATING MY NUTS. YOU SHOULD BE USED TO IT BY NOW FOOL. YOU ARE THE ONE WHO RESPONDS TO ME EVERY TIME YOU SEE ME POST. ITS LIKE YOU ACTUALLY LOOK FOR MY POSTS JUST SO YOU CAN REPLY. THAT TELLS ME NOTHING OTHER THAN YOU WANT TO FUCK ME. I WOULD BE FLATTERED IF I WAS GAY.

YOU KNOW, INSTEAD OF DEVOTING TIME AND ENERGY TO ME, YOU SHOULD REDIRECT THAT TIME AND ENERGY TO SOMETHING MORE USEFUL. MIGHT I SUGGEST DRINKING SOME HEMLOCK. YOU CAN SAVE THE HUMAN RACE THE TROUBLE OF HAVING TO DEAL WITH YOUR ABSOLUTE MORONIC ASS FOR THE DURATION OF THE GENERATION.

ON THAT NOTE, I HAVE A RESERVATION AT RUTH'S CHRIS STEAKHOUSE. I CAN NO LONGER ENTERTAIN YOU THIS EVENING. HOWEVER, SINCE YOU LIKE MEN SO MUCH, PM ANAL ASSPLORER. I'M SURE HE WILL GLADLY REEM YOU A NEW ASSHOLE THIS EVENING. ARENT YOU BOTH IN FLORIDA? WELL THERE YOU GO, ITS SETTLED THEN....CALL HIM UP AND HAVE SOME FUN.

SEE YA SPARKY!!!



KAYNE

You're the one who always speaks of homosexual acts. Seems to me you're the butt cowboy here, KAYNE. It's okay, we all understand you like boys and I'll be willing to bet that your beloved canine is a male.

Boylover.

Ruth's, huh? Veterans and the causeway, next to the mall perhaps? I hope you and your boy have a nice dinner together.

 

[biteme]

SILENT
OK, LET ME TRY THIS AGAIN FOR YOU. THE COMMENT I MADE ABOUT KILLING FIRST THEN ASKING QUESTIONS LATER WAS IN ASSUMPTION THAT YOU COULD USE YOUR COMPREHANSION LEVEL (EVEN THOUGH IT SEEMS LIKE A 5TH GRADE LEVEL) TO ASSUME I WAS BEING SARCASTIC. WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER SHIT I SAID ABOUT THE MOTHER AND KIDS. YOU OBVIOUSLY KNEW I WAS BEING SARCASTIC WITH THAT SO I REALLY DONT UNDERSTAND WHY YOU CANT COMPREHEND THIS OTHER STATEMENT. YOU JUST WANT TO BE A DICK, BUT THATS COOL. I HAD FUN ENTERTAINING YOU. HAVENT GOTTEN IN AN ARGUMENT ON HERE IN QUITE SOME TIME.

LET ME CLARIFY THIS AS WELL. WHEN IT COMES TO MY DOG, I THINK OF HIM AS MY SON AND CARE FOR HIM AS SUCH. SO I WOULD DO WHAT ANY FATHER WOULD DO IF HE SAW SOMEONE INTENTIONALLY HARM HIS SON. TO PUT IT A LITTLE MORE BLUNTLY, I MORE THAN LIKELY WOULD NOT SHOOT SOMEONE IF THEY KILLED MY DOG. HOWEVER, I WOULD BEAT THEM WITH MY HANDS, A BASEBALL BAT, A CROWBAR, OR ANY OTHER FOREIGN OBJECT I CAN FIND TO INFLICT PAIN.

HERE IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE. I HAVE NVR HIT MY DOG IN MY LIFE. WHEN MY DOG WAS A PUPPY, MY OLDER BROTHER SLAPPED HIM ACROSS THE FACE AND MADE HIM YELP. I DIDNT SAY A WORD. I SIMPLY WALKED INSIDE, GOT MY BASEBALL GEAR BAG OUT. TOOK OUT MY 32 1/2 INCH EASTON C-CORE BAT WHICH I HAD JUST BOUGHT FOR 200$, WALKED BACK OUTSIDE AND PROCEEDED TO HIT A HOMERUN ACROSS HIS FUCKING BACK. AND THAT WAS MY FUCKING BROTHER ASSHOLE!!! HE IS MUCH OLDER THAN ME AND I WAS IN MY MID TEENS AT THE TIME SO HE PROBABLY WOULD HAVE BEATEN MY ASS IN A FIGHT (WHICH HAS DEFINITELY NOT BEEN THE CASE SINCE 19).


KAYNE

Kayne, this guy likes to start arguments. It's mostly what he does. Just ignore him. He butts in on other people's comments to each other to try and get you riled.

 

[KAYNE]

You're the one who always speaks of homosexual acts. Seems to me you're the butt cowboy here, KAYNE. It's okay, we all understand you like boys and I'll be willing to bet that your beloved canine is a male.

Boylover.

Ruth's, huh? Veterans and the causeway, next to the mall perhaps? I hope you and your boy have a nice dinner together.

CANT COME UP WITH YOUR OWN SHIT SO YOU BITE MINE. FIGURES!!! OH WELL.

HAD A GREAT DINNER. ATE A NICE FILET, COME CRAB CAKES, A SALAD, AND A CHOCOLATE MOOSE CHEESECAKE. THX FOR ASKING, SO NICE OF YOU.

BTW....I HAD THE FINEST CHICK IN THE PLACE. SOMETHING YOU PROBABLY WOULDNT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT.


KAYNE

 

[KAYNE]

BITEME

YEAH, I'M STARTING TO REALIZE THAT. JUST LIKE XBIKER. EVERY TIME I POST, NO MATTER WHAT IT IS, HE ALWAYS CHIMES IN. HE HAS BEEN DOING IT SO LONG THAT I'M CONVINCED HE WANTS TO SUCK MY DICK. I KEEP TELLING HIM I'M INTO FEMALES THOUGH. HE JUST WONT LISTEN.



KAYNE

 

[mylife]

IT WAS IN THE 135-145 RANGE LAST TIME I HAD IT TESTED. I WAS YOUNG BUT I'M SURE IT HASNT DECLINED ANY.

c'mon now.

 

[Silent Method]

Gee whiz, i can see getting attached to your dog, and not wanting harm to come to it, but in the end it is only a dog, and all dogs die within 10 years or so.

Don't make me get started on you now!

 

[XBiker]

COME CRAB CAKES, A SALAD, AND A CHOCOLATE MOOSE CHEESECAKE. THX FOR ASKING, SO NICE OF YOU.

BTW....I HAD THE FINEST CHICK IN THE PLACE. SOMETHING YOU PROBABLY WOULDNT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT.


KAYNE

I bet those crab cakes went down nice and easy!

BTW, did you check your date for an Adam's apple?

 

[Silent Method]

Originally posted by biteme Kayne, this guy likes to start arguments. It's mostly what he does. Just ignore him. He butts in on other people's comments to each other to try and get you riled.

Well sort of. Conversation beyond small talk is, in essence, a series of arguments. Even offering personal insight in regard to an others comment or inquiry is a sort of argument. I could stick to posting raw personal experiences or dry transfer of factual information, but that's be a pretty limited form of expression.

If I see something that strikes my fancy, I may chose to argue a point one way or the other. Big deal. It's a message board. No reason to be riled.

Biteme, you made some comments in a different post that struck me as absurd. I chose to present an argument. You set me straight regarding one of your and told me that you'd not meant it the way I had taken it - in fact we agreed on that point! I still took issue with another comment you had made, an issue which we hadn't resolved.

Sounds pretty much like simple conversation from two non-identical minds. If you viewed this as an attempt to get you riled, I apologize.

 

[The Unjust]

ITS NOT EVEN A BLIP ON THE RADAR OF FELONIES I HAVE COMMITTED.


KAYNE

Like being born?

 

[Silent Method]

SILENT
OK, LET ME TRY THIS AGAIN FOR YOU. THE COMMENT I MADE ABOUT KILLING FIRST THEN ASKING QUESTIONS LATER WAS IN ASSUMPTION THAT YOU COULD USE YOUR COMPREHANSION LEVEL (EVEN THOUGH IT SEEMS LIKE A 5TH GRADE LEVEL) TO ASSUME I WAS BEING SARCASTIC. WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER SHIT I SAID ABOUT THE MOTHER AND KIDS. YOU OBVIOUSLY KNEW I WAS BEING SARCASTIC WITH THAT SO I REALLY DONT UNDERSTAND WHY YOU CANT COMPREHEND THIS OTHER STATEMENT. YOU JUST WANT TO BE A DICK, BUT THATS COOL. I HAD FUN ENTERTAINING YOU. HAVENT GOTTEN IN AN ARGUMENT ON HERE IN QUITE SOME TIME.

Let me try to illuminate some logical points regarding this argument for you.

1. You posted a reply to MP5's first post. At the time you made that post you had misunderstood the story and felt that MP5 may have handled the situation badly. You added, somewhat aside, that if something happened to your dog you'd kill the person that did it.

2. Having understood MP5's story myself, I felt your comment was poorly directed to MP5. Perhaps this is my mistake - not realizing that you had misunderstood MP5 with regard to your first comments.

3. I chose to respond to what I considered a poor comment, and you soon admitted was a mistaken comment, to MP5. Not yet knowing that you had made the post in misunderstanding, I worded my post in a way that called your reasoning into question. Having expressed what I though was poor reasoning regarding MP5's situation, I included a comment questioning your reasoning about killing anyone who'd harm your dog.

4. You made your second post explaining that your first had been made under a false premise of the situation.

5. I responded to your second post, highlighting the part regarding the high rearguard and protective mindset over dogs you have over dogs, and stated "I agree."

At this point, both of our first posts were moot and, in my opinion, any call for argument had vanished. You admitted your first post was misdirected and I replied in a positive manner to that admital. I had dropped the issue with no reason to further question you. However, you saw fit to question me further.

This is where, IMO, you began to apply faulty logic
6. Even after I had replied in a positive manner to your SECOND post you chose to reply to my FIRST post, worded in way that called my reasoning into question.
Had you simply not read my reply to your second post at this point? If not, this would explain your motivation behind your defending yourself from my first reply to you, and I would have dropped the issue once more.

You called my attention to your second post, which was useless because I had already seen, understood, and replied to it.

In addition, you reasserted your position about killing anyone who'd harm your dog, using the phrase "kill first and ask questions later."

7. I felt your questioning of my reasoning AFTER I HAD READ, AGREED, AND REPLIED to your second, clarifying post was illogical. Blah blah blah, we began arguing over the argument as much as any one idea.


Would you like me to continue? Shall I illustrate in further detail where I think I'm right and your wrong in points 1-7? Shall I outline more of our dialogue?
KAYNE

LET ME CLARIFY THIS AS WELL. WHEN IT COMES TO MY DOG...

No need to clarify. I understand your position and agree. The "base argument" (if you can call it that) regarding what you'd do if your dog was harmed has been settled.
KAYNE

HERE IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE...

Again, I don't need to know how you beat you neighbor in front of his family or battered your brother with a baseball bat, both over issues with dogs. I began to argue with you in question of your logic, and likewise, that same type of questioning directed at me.

I fear little of this will make any difference to you. However, I rather enjoy attempting to explain all this, not so much for you but for me. If I didn't enjoy it, I wouldn't be her. If you don't enjoy it, why argue back?

I've got finals to ready myself for, so I'm going to quit for now.