HOW DID HE DO IT????????????????????

[gwl9dta4]

then how do you take into account that every

Weider contracted Mr. Olympia has always had a pysique just 2-3 steps ahead of every other competitior?

even Ronnie........after he got the O....his physique took huge bound in progress.......

the same with Yates.

Haney

Arnold

Oliva.......alomost all of them

its just a guess of course....but something happened to all of them and the thought of them having every concievable test done including what gwl9dta4 said would seem possible, and in fact necessary

Yes i definitely see the point you made. In fact look at Cutler, Suddenly he made astounding improvements to his physique. Common sence tells me there is more then meets the eye to their cycling. Receptor mapping may in fact allow you to find the particular drug your body tolerates really well, thus safely allowing you to use extremply high dosages with virtually no ill effects. But without that knowledge you may be shooting in the dark trying to find your ideal drug, ester, dosage or stack in the effects versus side effects scenario.

 

[cockdezl]

"then how do you take into account that every

Weider contracted Mr. Olympia has always had a pysique just 2-3 steps ahead of every other competitior?

even Ronnie........after he got the O....his physique took huge bound in progress.......

the same with Yates.

Haney

Arnold

Oliva.......alomost all of them"

Ummm...could be increased income, which allows for better choice of drugs (GH, IGF, etc.), along with more free time to devote to training and nutrition, and also hiring of better trainers.

We have learned more about resistance training and its effects on muscle growth and trainers are know more knowledgable about these issues. Early Olympia winners trained so poorly by todays standards and also ate worse.

"There is still a great deal that science has to explain. If what you say is true 100% of the time then the release times, for example, of different esters would be irrelevant to your gains, yet some respond really well to long acting ester blends like sustanon where 250 mg weekly will give excellent gains but an Enanthate ester at the same dosage may do next to nothing."

"Incidentally, i respond like crazy to low doses of sust, but very poorly to a enanthate of cypionate ester. I need much higher dosages of enet or cyp for the same result i get with sust."

If you understood the pharmacokinetics of these drugs, then you would understand that the difference is governed by a very simple concept.

"There are many examples i could use, and i believe thet that human body reacts to each drug very differently in different people, if that was not the case we would all make great gains using the same exact drugs and the exact same dosages."

Humans are slightly different physiologically, but not dramatically. We are still governed by the same concepts, if this were not true then doctors would have a hard time prescribing medications to anyone.

 

[strong island]

Don't forget he was 6'2"..thats awesome. A giant by todays standards.


Todays bodybuilders (in my opinion) look fucking ridiculous and stupid. Their proportions suck because they all have big waists. They have huge lats but the V does NOT compare to the V Columbo and Arnold had in the 70's. Arnold had a 34 inch waist!!!!!

For Christs sake...Ronnie Coleman looks like he is going to have a fucking hear attack any minute. The law of diminishing returns is approaching. I hope bodybuilding takes a different route.

 

[bigp3]

I dont think things were that complex back then that an endochronoligist would have been used. You have to remember Arnold has one of the best work ethics of all time. Anything he ever set out to do he was always a success. Whether was business, bodybuilding or acting. Most people don't realize that Arnold was a millionaire before he was a movie star. He is educated sharp and the hardest worker of all time.

All hail Arnold!!!

 

[posthuman]

There were not many anabolic brands available in Arnie's day. I understand that he favoured primo and dbol. I understand that he took a lot of dbol and took it for extended periods of time (beyond the 5 weeks commonly recommended here). Steve Reeves, Arni, Franco, etc were products mostly of dbol, test and primo.

Actually the selection of roids was extremely good.By the 60's pretty much all roids available today had been developed.
Remember that there isn't much incentive to research new roids today-due to the legal climate.
Besides the basics such as dbol are still the best.

 

[manny78]

hard training (not always but...), good diet, great genetics and some juice (but nothing compared to today's freaks),