Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Hey Wronghorn: Look What One Of Your FOX Friends Thinks About Black People

While trying to be positive,

  • O'Rielly reveals himself to be ignorant and/or racist

    Votes: 13 52.0%

  • O'Rielly is getting a raw deal in the media with this

    Votes: 12 48.0%
  • Total voters
    25
Powerbuilder333 said:
No.
O'Rilley's words were taken out of context. Only ignorant people would think otherwise.
Untill now I thought he was over reacting to CNN's corrupt journalism, but know I see he was right to be outraged.
Click to expand...


As reported, the far-left smear Web site Media Matters distorted a very positive discussion on race and accused me of racism.

Today, there was outrage:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: This is a case where Bill O'Reilly actually was saying something good and positive and uplifting to his radio audience. And instead now, he gets dragged through the mud as if he's a racist. Very unfair on the part of Media Matters.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Now all fair-minded people know that Media Matters, CNN and the other media in bed with the far left have lied about what actually happened on "The Radio Factor." Just listen to the unedited broadcast available on billoreilly.com and you'll see.

But the corrupt press doesn't care about that. CNN picked up the Media Matters defamation because they are getting hammered in the ratings. Besides CNN, the worst offender in this case is The New York Daily News, which strung together quotes that were said five minutes apart on different topics. Can you believe it?
 
read standalone sentences, read contiguous sentences, read the whole transcript. . res ipsa loquitur. it speaks for itself.

He was amazed it was just like any other place even tho it was run by blacks and has black patrons. Period. His words. You cant put lipstick on this pig no matter how hard you try.

what did you expect o'rielly to say - "ok you got me, I'm a cretin" ?

The worst part is he thinks he's saying/doing something positive by acknowledging blacks dont throw shit at the walls when they eat out.
 
Mavafanculo said:
read standalone sentences, read contiguous sentences, read the whole transcript. . res ipsa loquitur. it speaks for itself. :)

He was amazed it was just like any other place even tho it was run by blacks and has black patrons. Period. His words. You cant put lipstick on this pig no matter how hard you try. C'mon, do I even need to comment

what did you expect o'rielly to say - "ok you got me, I'm a cretin" ? No, that's what the left expects. Usually isn't long before the name calling starts.

The worst part is he thinks he's saying/doing something positive by acknowledging blacks dont throw shit at the walls when they eat out.
Click to expand...
Can't acknowledge the whole article can you. It's ok believe what you want


I'll let this speak for itself:)
 
Just the fact that O'Rilley was willing to eat with a tool like Sharpton in Harlem, and pick up the tab, says alot for O'Rilley's charactor.
No he's not fair and balanced, and neither is any other person in the world.
 
bw1 said:
Can't acknowledge the whole article can you. It's ok believe what you want

I'll let this speak for itself:)
Click to expand...
are we in the same conversation here?

"I dont need to comment" because there's nothing you can say to change his words. "...And I couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City. I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks, primarily black patronship...."

It is what it is. You cant even parse it to make it better. Its one sentence.

I acknowledged the whole article. He THINKS he's being positive. By acknowledging blacks can be civilized. And he "couldnt get over that fact". Thats the worst part.

If this quote/conversation by O'Rielly was from 1960, it would be positive. In 2007, its ignorant and racist.

res ipsa loquitur.

-
 
Mavafanculo said:
are we in the same conversation here?

"I dont need to comment" because there's nothing you can say to change his words. "...And I couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City. I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks, primarily black patronship...."

It is what it is. EXACTLY, not what the New York Daily news "wrote" You cant even parse it to make it better. Its one sentence. NO, NO it's not just one sentence. It's a whole article that was purposely taken out of context to advance a politcal agenda.[/SIZE]


I acknowledged the whole article. He THINKS he's being positive. By acknowledging blacks can be civilized. And he "couldnt get over that fact". Thats the worst part. Read the article again. Oreilly's not a racisist, FACT No matter how hard the left wants to make him look like he is


If this quote was from 1960, it would be positive. In 2007, its ignorant and racist.
In 2007, the left is still playing the same old cards
res ipsa loquitur.

-
Click to expand...


Facts are Facts
 
Mavafanculo said:
are we in the same conversation here? NO, I guess we are not

"I dont need to comment" because there's nothing you can say to change his words. Nor can you or the NY Daily news"...And I couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City. I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks, primarily black patronship...."

It is what it is. You cant even parse it to make it better. Its one sentence.

I acknowledged the whole article. He THINKS he's being positive. By acknowledging blacks can be civilized. And he "couldnt get over that fact". Thats the worst part.

If this quote/conversation by O'Rielly was from 1960, it would be positive. In 2007, its ignorant and racist.

res ipsa loquitur.

-
Click to expand...


You KNOW he was not making racists comments. Sad what the left resorts to.
 
The Daily News "wrote" what he said. no different than the transcript from his site. I dont know what you're trying to say.

He wasnt trying to be racist, he just revealed his racist (maybe predjudiced is a better word?) inner thinking


Poll added. Let the people decide.

-
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom