Help me work on this 3rd cycle.

[veneto82]

Well its effects are anabolic so I think thats all they need. So based on it being used for anabolic purposes and creating anabolic effects - how is that not an anabolic substance?

Yeah they did confiscate it - but SARMS were good enough to send a second one through to me free of charge which got through... strange how they knew exactly what substance it was... normally the bottles NEVER have any labels on it.. but when i got done they said exactly: OSTA-SARMS MK2866

furthermore I had already read the legislation on the customs website stating the list of banned substances and sarms was not on it. When I called customs up to dispute the issue the lady just informed me that the list was not exhaustive and there can still be plenty more

sounds like they were just being pricks!!
Normally the label says "for research purposes"
See it doesn't have anabolic compounds in it, just because it creates an anabolic effect doesn't mind its a steroid. On the letter did they say they tested the chemicals in it? cause normally they do to see if its an illegal steroid...

 

[aj13]

sounds like they were just being pricks!!
Normally the label says "for research purposes"
See it doesn't have anabolic compounds in it, just because it creates an anabolic effect doesn't mind its a steroid. On the letter did they say they tested the chemicals in it? cause normally they do to see if its an illegal steroid...

The label on the website says for research purposes only but Iv ordered 3 bottles and normally they have nothing written on them - with a different description written on the box.

They didnt say they tested the chemicals in it they just said it was an anabolic substance OSTA SARMS etc...

I'll put up a pic of the letter!

 

[EZ_E]

Sorry EZ, Im having difficulty figuring out which direction your pointing me in,

first you said that the higher dose of 750mg didnt do much more than what your lower dosages ever did - which would be a reason against,

However then you say: "the defined gains which may make the higher dose a better choice"..

which did you think overall.

Thatbloke - Cheers, Im thinking of going with what you said - especially because the more test I take the more sides generally - Acne/bloat... If i could keep it to 500 i guess that would be preferable.

I mean that for my goals 750 mg's/week wasn't necessary, but if YOU are looking to bulk, 750 mg's/week may yield you better results

~EZ

 

[aj13]

ok well Iv got 3 x vials of sus 250 = 30 ml so thought I'd run 2.4ml/week = 600 test for 12 weeks. + 200 deca for 10 weeks.

I was wondering would I notice much of a difference throwing in that deca @ 300mg would really like to avoid forking out another $300 for a second vial of deca.

Im really thinking this dosage will be hit the nail on the head - don't wanna be too aggressive with the deca, thought 200 would be good for joints and I havn't done it before.

thoughts and opinions?

AJ