Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Heavy Metals in Cosmetics

trex74

whatev
Platinum
Dont take my word for it, check out the websites and if not stated contact them through their site, but it seems Bare Escentuals, Arbonne and Nutrimetics are mineral based and have no nickel, other than that seems all commercial brands, whether they are high end or cheap, have nickel
 
Dont take my word for it, check out the websites and if not stated contact them through their site, but it seems Bare Escentuals, Arbonne and Nutrimetics are mineral based and have no nickel, other than that seems all commercial brands, whether they are high end or cheap, have nickel

Thanks! i appreciater it- I have to totally replace evrything now
- ugh
 
Yeah the large cosmetic companies that claim to have organic cosmetic lines are just FOS. Read the ingredient panels. They aren't. There do seem to be some pretty legit alternatives though.

Saffron Rouge - Organic Beauty & Skin Care Products
pure & true | organic skin care | Premier Collection
http://www.lushusa.com/shop/about-lush/articles/

There's also that Wen shampoo, which I'm using now. Stupidly expensive, but it pretty damn wholesome and it does work.

Know that unlike food items the FDA has absolutely no regs that define "organic" with respect to cosmetics, so manufacturers can claim anything in their merchandising. You have to read the back panels closely. Usually "natural" means pretty much nothing.
 
Well I am not wearing my old makeup until I get new stuff that is metal free. except mascara, I just can't live without it- lol. I am still pist off about this whole thing. I will be rocking the sporty look until i can go get replacement stuff from this natural grocery store place Rainbow foods. They have that Lavera line.
 
You would have to put like 2 lbs of cosmetics on your face a day to see any negative side effects.

Maybe, but seeing as I have a nickel allergy, and there is nickel in 100 % of the products tested, I'm just not going to use those products anymore.
My mind is made up.
 
The degree of deleterious impact of HM and other contaminants (herbicides/pesticides, etc)in consumer products and food depends heavily on the individual's unique biochemistry. I tend to think that if you're otherwise completely healthy, and if you're well nourished, and if both your Phase 1 and 2 detox pathways are working well, then yeah probably you can consume all kinds of contaminants and not experience any kind of noticeable degradation in your quality of life. That's a lot of "ifs" though. I suspect that typically we only notice health problems from contaminants when they are acute and I'm certain all of us would be generally healthier and better prepared to resist disease if our bodies weren't burdened with all this shit.
 
but if they havent given you issues why discontinue use?

Because I don't like being lied to. Basically the sales pitch to be your most beautiful with XYZ product, when really if they said oh btw there's lead in your lipstick, I wouldn't have bought it in the first place.
It's the principle of it.
 
Because I don't like being lied to. Basically the sales pitch to be your most beautiful with XYZ product, when really if they said oh btw there's lead in your lipstick, I wouldn't have bought it in the first place.
It's the principle of it.

That's true! It's like why even put it in there in the first place? If you can get just as good results with real organic or real natural shit with minimum ingredients than why can't the big companies do the same shit? Are heavy metals beneficial? Sorry I know this is a chick thread.
 
That's true! It's like why even put it in there in the first place? If you can get just as good results with real organic or real natural shit with minimum ingredients than why can't the big companies do the same shit? Are heavy metals beneficial? Sorry I know this is a chick thread.

Here is some information about the heavy metals in cosmetics from Lab Tests Find Toxic Heavy Metals in Makeup That Canadian Women Wear Every Day | Environmental Defence

I don't want that stuff on my face, I can't imagine who would.

For Immediate Release: May 16, 2011

Lab Tests Find Toxic Heavy Metals in Makeup That Canadian Women Wear Every Day
Environmental Defence calls on Health Canada to improve and regulate impurity limits, and enforce impurities disclosure

TORONTO, ON - Cosmetic products that Canadians put on their faces every day have been found to contain toxic heavy metals, such as lead, arsenic, and cadmium, according to a report released today by Environmental Defence. In a lab test of the products in six Canadian women's makeup bags, each of the 49 products was found to be contaminated with heavy metals and some products contained levels of arsenic and lead that far exceeded the limits recommended by Health Canada. None of the products listed the metals on the labels.

"Canadians deserve to know what is in their cosmetics," said Dr. Rick Smith, executive director of Environmental Defence. "Given the choice, we think most consumers would not put arsenic or lead on their lips and faces."
  • The tests, done by SGS Canada, found that 100% of products tested contained nickel, 96% contained lead, and 90% contained beryllium
  • At least one of the products tested contained seven of the eight metals of concern (arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, beryllium, nickel, selenium, and thallium)
  • On average, products contained four of the eight metals of concern
  • The highest levels of arsenic (70 ppm), cadmium (3 ppm), and lead (110 ppm) were all found in lip glosses, something which could be ingested
  • The product containing the highest level of lead was Benefit Benetint lip gloss, at 110ppm, over 10 times higher than the 10ppm limit set out in the Health Canada Draft Guidance on Heavy Metal Impurities in Cosmetics. This same product contained 70ppm of Arsenic, which is over 20 times higher than Health Canada's recommended limit of 3ppm.
The heavy metals are "impurities" - unintentional contaminants in products - and therefore subject to less regulation and disclosure than intentional ingredients. Health Canada has developed draft guidelines for some metals impurity levels it believes are "technically avoidable" by manufacturers. However, a study of 20 lipsticks conducted by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2009 showed lead impurity levels averaged 1.07 ppm, where Canada's current draft guideline for lead impurities is 10 ppm, which is considerably high by comparison.
The products tested largely met Canada's draft guidelines; however, the guidelines should reflect that lower levels of lead are clearly "technically avoidable". Moreover, the current draft guidelines only set limits for 5 heavy metals, where our testing found high levels of other heavy metal impurities that do not yet have a draft limit.

"Canada should improve the guidelines on impurities in cosmetics so they better reflect what is truly feasible, then adopt them without delay," said Smith. "These have been in the draft stage since March 2009."

"It makes me sick to realize that these chemicals and metals are in the products that I apply to my body," said Meggin Dueckman, makeup testing volunteer. "I feel that I am a careful consumer, and prefer to do research on personal care products before buying them. I normally read product labels as well. Despite this, the makeup that I have chosen to use all contains ingredients that I would avoid."

As a group, heavy metals can build up in the body over time and are known to cause varied health problems, which can include: cancer, reproductive and developmental disorders, neurological problems; memory loss; mood swings; nerve, joint and muscle disorders; cardiovascular, skeletal, blood, immune system, kidney and renal problems; headaches; vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea; lung damage; contact dermatitis; and brittle hair and hair loss. Many are suspected hormone disruptors and respiratory toxins, and for some like lead, there is no known safe blood level.

"The concern is not just that heavy metals are in our makeup, but exposure to these toxins through the products we apply to our skin, in the air we breathe, and in our water and food supply can all add up and accumulate in your body," added Dr. Smith. "What this means is that we should be striving to achieve the lowest impurity limits possible."

Some cosmetic companies are moving towards plant-based colorants and away from petroleum or coal tar-based colorants, to avoid product contamination with heavy metals. Others are asking their suppliers to screen for contaminants and source the least contaminated ingredients possible.

The report is available at http://environmentaldefence.ca/heavy-metal-hazard

About Environmental Defence (www.environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is Canada's most effective environmental action organization. We challenge, and inspire change in government, business and people to ensure a greener, healthier and prosperous life for all.

-30-​

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact:
Stephanie Kohls, Environmental Defence, 416-323-9521 ext. 232; 647-280-9521 (cell)
Campaign:
Just Beautiful
Toxic Nation
 
Here is some information about the heavy metals in cosmetics from Lab Tests Find Toxic Heavy Metals in Makeup That Canadian Women Wear Every Day | Environmental Defence

I don't want that stuff on my face, I can't imagine who would.

For Immediate Release: May 16, 2011

Lab Tests Find Toxic Heavy Metals in Makeup That Canadian Women Wear Every Day
Environmental Defence calls on Health Canada to improve and regulate impurity limits, and enforce impurities disclosure

TORONTO, ON - Cosmetic products that Canadians put on their faces every day have been found to contain toxic heavy metals, such as lead, arsenic, and cadmium, according to a report released today by Environmental Defence. In a lab test of the products in six Canadian women's makeup bags, each of the 49 products was found to be contaminated with heavy metals and some products contained levels of arsenic and lead that far exceeded the limits recommended by Health Canada. None of the products listed the metals on the labels.


"Canadians deserve to know what is in their cosmetics," said Dr. Rick Smith, executive director of Environmental Defence. "Given the choice, we think most consumers would not put arsenic or lead on their lips and faces."
  • The tests, done by SGS Canada, found that 100% of products tested contained nickel, 96% contained lead, and 90% contained beryllium
  • At least one of the products tested contained seven of the eight metals of concern (arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, beryllium, nickel, selenium, and thallium)
  • On average, products contained four of the eight metals of concern
  • The highest levels of arsenic (70 ppm), cadmium (3 ppm), and lead (110 ppm) were all found in lip glosses, something which could be ingested
  • The product containing the highest level of lead was Benefit Benetint lip gloss, at 110ppm, over 10 times higher than the 10ppm limit set out in the Health Canada Draft Guidance on Heavy Metal Impurities in Cosmetics. This same product contained 70ppm of Arsenic, which is over 20 times higher than Health Canada's recommended limit of 3ppm.
The heavy metals are "impurities" - unintentional contaminants in products - and therefore subject to less regulation and disclosure than intentional ingredients. Health Canada has developed draft guidelines for some metals impurity levels it believes are "technically avoidable" by manufacturers. However, a study of 20 lipsticks conducted by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2009 showed lead impurity levels averaged 1.07 ppm, where Canada's current draft guideline for lead impurities is 10 ppm, which is considerably high by comparison.
The products tested largely met Canada's draft guidelines; however, the guidelines should reflect that lower levels of lead are clearly "technically avoidable". Moreover, the current draft guidelines only set limits for 5 heavy metals, where our testing found high levels of other heavy metal impurities that do not yet have a draft limit.

"Canada should improve the guidelines on impurities in cosmetics so they better reflect what is truly feasible, then adopt them without delay," said Smith. "These have been in the draft stage since March 2009."

"It makes me sick to realize that these chemicals and metals are in the products that I apply to my body," said Meggin Dueckman, makeup testing volunteer. "I feel that I am a careful consumer, and prefer to do research on personal care products before buying them. I normally read product labels as well. Despite this, the makeup that I have chosen to use all contains ingredients that I would avoid."

As a group, heavy metals can build up in the body over time and are known to cause varied health problems, which can include: cancer, reproductive and developmental disorders, neurological problems; memory loss; mood swings; nerve, joint and muscle disorders; cardiovascular, skeletal, blood, immune system, kidney and renal problems; headaches; vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea; lung damage; contact dermatitis; and brittle hair and hair loss. Many are suspected hormone disruptors and respiratory toxins, and for some like lead, there is no known safe blood level.

"The concern is not just that heavy metals are in our makeup, but exposure to these toxins through the products we apply to our skin, in the air we breathe, and in our water and food supply can all add up and accumulate in your body," added Dr. Smith. "What this means is that we should be striving to achieve the lowest impurity limits possible."

Some cosmetic companies are moving towards plant-based colorants and away from petroleum or coal tar-based colorants, to avoid product contamination with heavy metals. Others are asking their suppliers to screen for contaminants and source the least contaminated ingredients possible.

The report is available at http://environmentaldefence.ca/heavy-metal-hazard

About Environmental Defence (www.environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is Canada's most effective environmental action organization. We challenge, and inspire change in government, business and people to ensure a greener, healthier and prosperous life for all.

-30-​

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact:
Stephanie Kohls, Environmental Defence, 416-323-9521 ext. 232; 647-280-9521 (cell)
Campaign:
Just Beautiful
Toxic Nation


Thanks for sharing this
 
I'm gonna show my girl this.. I agree tho, it's the principal of the matter... If ppl wanna put that on their skin and body hey that's their choice. But it should be a choice and not the norm.
 
What bothers me too is that they are all mainstream high-end brands. It's not like it's just the cheapo stuff.
 
Update:
I have done some research and made the following purchases:
Mascara:
Physician's Formula Organic wear 100 % Natural Origin Jumbo Lash in Ultra Black. No parabens or chemicals. I got it for $ 11.99 on sale
Physicians Formula: Organic wear® 100% Natural Origin Jumbo Lash Mascara
Eyeliner: Lavera Eyeliner in Brown. Tested for nickel (!) I got it for $ 15.99
Lavera Natural Makeup, Soft Eyeliner - Brown | Lavera Organic
Lips:
Burts Bees lip shimmer in peony. I got it for $ 5.99.
Burt's Bees
I am not sure about how little heavy metals are in the Burt's Bees though, one of the ingredients is tin oxide. Sigh.
 
What would be really helpful is if they had some type of interactive thing where you could choose what makeup you use on a daily basis, then see how much metal content it has that you're applying to your face every day. Seeing stats on makeup and other girls' makeup is one thing, if women could see the stats of their actual makeup, I'm sure they'd be much more likely to take action.

Anyways, only one thing I use was mentioned in that PDF. I occasionally use BENEfit concealer, but rarely seeing as I seldom have a reason for concealer.

FYI I also found out recently titanium oxide and zinc oxide is used in most sunblocks.
 
Top Bottom