Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply puritysourcelabs US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAKUS-PHARMACIESRaptor Labs

Hammer bench press - a fantastic machine.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Debaser
  • Start date Start date
D

Debaser

Guest
Does anyone else love this machine as much as I do? Often benching just doesn't feel natural for me. It also has many form technicalities. When I do the seated flat press hammer machine and dips (also as effective some would argue more so than benching) I get a quality chest workout. Either using one of them or both, no more than 3 sets between them.

The shoulder press doesn't feel as natural to me and so I stick to barbell overhead presses for that.
 
I use mostly barbell bench, but my friend swears by reverse grip hammer benches for tricep development. It seems to work for him, because his arms look like legs, lol. :D
 
i think i used it once, the incline one.. it was ok..

but, i would never do it over free weight BB benchpress or incline..

i dont really like machines.. i think cuz im too short, and they are not made for everyone.. but of course i use the lat pulldown, tri press down ect. and stuff.. but im not a big fan of hammer strenght machine...

OH, except for the seated hammer strenght row.. the one dorian used.. for sure
 
i never do machines but i was visiting a friend out of town. went to work out with him and the had Hammer Strength.

incline seated press
flat/decline seated press
overhead press
lat pull down

all worked perfect for me, i couldn't believe it
 
Debaser said:
Does anyone else love this machine as much as I do? Often benching just doesn't feel natural for me. It also has many form technicalities. When I do the seated flat press hammer machine and dips (also as effective some would argue more so than benching) I get a quality chest workout. Either using one of them or both, no more than 3 sets between them.

The shoulder press doesn't feel as natural to me and so I stick to barbell overhead presses for that.

I use the hammer bench often. I find that it hits my pecs MUCH better than a normal bench. If I grab the inside grip, I don't feel it in my delts or tris, just me chest.

My PR right now is 410 for 5, But I am going for 450 on Monday.
 
off to the gym now to hit the hammer incline press in my DC rotation.

i believe last time was 2 45's and a 35...this week 3 plates a side will be mine. yaaaaay!

i tell you what, the hammer wide chest/decline type movement, you can move some weight on. short range of motion and its like dips...i guess its an ego machine. i dont use it anymore, but its funny to see the difference between the normal bench press and that machine.

of the hammer equipment, i prefer the lying or seated chest press. lying being more fun, it starts off heavier from the go, and is easier to adjust...since you just slide up or down to place your hands. (i hate adjusting machines)

ps, kronk....thats some damn PR! sheeeesh!!!:)
 
Used to use the incline chest all the time and loved it! Gone back to regular incline bench though. Did'nt feel like I got as much of an overall growth effect due to the fixed plane that the hammer strength moves in. Used to like the hammer behind the neck press for shoulders and hammer rows as well.
 
I can't think of a single machine that would provide more benefit than a free weight...

...unless you are rehabbing something...

B True
 
machines are for people who cant handle real weight..

like BB rows are harder than a rowing machine.. so people do them.

plus, i see alot of 'pretty boys' on machines.. haha, it makes me laugh.. i just think, what if they came over to the other side of the gym, ya know, with the benches and squat racks and DB's..

i dunno, they'd get better results.. a little more beat up, but better results
 
Debaser said:
Does anyone else love this machine as much as I do?

I did after my spine injury in 97'. My body became out of proportion due to my lack of activity. The isolation Hammer machines helped put my upper body back together during extensive rehab.

Since then I have gained 83 pounds. I attribute the brunt of it all to free weights. There is no compound benefit for me in machine work anymore. :)
 
TheOak84 said:
machines are for people who cant handle real weight..

With all due respect, that is one of the most ignorant statements I have heard. What is so sad, is I see it a lot around here.

Lets say this, I can and DO bench with a barbell, about 360 to 400lbs max. However, I find that I can isolate my pecs MUCH more on an inside grip hammer bench. I use BB's and dumbells everyday, but I also incorporate cables and hammer machines.

Rather than make asinine comments, you may wish to state that it is YOUR opinion. Making comments like this is what is the major issue on the training board. Lots of good bros and bro'etts get scared off by comments like this.

I have seen these comments made here again and again, and over and over. This is getting old. :o

Do you do leg extensions? Leg curls? Cables? If so, you are using a machine. If you are not, then you are a powerlifter, or someone that is not as concerned with the aesthetics of competitive bodybuilding.
 
To be quite honest, i alternat hammer incline and flat bench with my dumbells. It's very complimentry as far as the weight you can out on it. However, the muscle gets sore from using it. I like their chest and some of their back equipment.
 
TheOak84 said:
machines are for people who cant handle real weight..

Well I guess Dorian Yates, Chris Cormier, Flex Wheeler, Greg Kovacs, Ronnie Coleman, and Jay Cutler are unable to use real weight.

These guys include hammer strength work in their routine.

What about NFL players? These guys use a lot of hammer strength equipment and a lot of these guys are pushing 550lbs on the bench press.

I don't think this statement is accurate.
 
Last edited:
strider364 said:


We have one at the gym I lift at, awesome machine, doesn't hurt my joints, and you can lift a ton of weight!

God bless you for being lucky. That machine is the greatest piece I have ever used. It hits the chest absolutely perfect. No strain on the elbows or lower back (from arching) you just grip and press that baby upwards, and you can literally feel your chest grow.
 
The ymca that I go to when I workout outside of my garage has every hammer strength lift made. The hammer bench is one of the nicest lifts ive done. You can really sqeeze those pecs, and definitely feel it working. Thats the only non-freeweight peace that i would reccommend someone to use
 
louden_swain said:


Well I guess Dorian Yates, Chris Cormier, Flex Wheeler, Greg Kovacs, Ronnie Coleman, and Jay Cutler cant's use real weight.

These guys include hammer strength work in their routine.

What about NFL players? These guys use a lot of hammer strength equipment and a lot of these guys are pushing 550lbs on the bench press.

I don't think this statement is accurate.

I know what Oak really meant; there's a large crowd at every gym that gravitates toward machines who are simply afraid to squat, deadlift, and free weights in general. I call them the Men's Fitness bunch. They do tend to be a kind of pansy bunch in bodybuilding terms, the sort that say, "I don't want to be big!"

My uncles were like that. They exclusively trained with Nautilus machines in the early eighties. Some of those pieces were awesome--the Super Pullover machine is a fantastic lat movement, and the Duo Squat was excellent for the entire thigh--but they operated under the assumption that "free weights build a beefier muscle." (?! Why not use free weights then?)

But they were notorious for making highly illogical statements. One of them asserts that Christianity is better than Islam because the former "never had leaders that advocated violence against non-believers." I am Christian, and I find that statement absolutely absurd.

The fact is, they were pussy trainers, and the free weight guys were serious. Muscle is muscle; the free weight crowd built it because they worked hard, and my two uncles didn't. It had nothing to do with the fact that they wouldn't venture from their Nautilus equipment.

I like Hammer Strength pieces, myself, and evidently a lot of pros do, too. They don't have to preempt deadlifts, dips, and squats to be effective. They're just tools...and I've always thought resistance is resistance. Some machines are gold; others, you'd be better off using the old stand-bys.

Why it ever became an "either-or" scenario, I'm not sure...if the Men's Fitness crowd were snotty about it, I might understand better, but other than sneers and accusations from them that free weight guys are all juicing, I've never seen that bunch act as if their machines were superior overall to BBs and DBs. Shit, even Arthur Jones trained all of his people with a number of free-weight movements like dips, chins, squats, stiff-legged deadlifts, DB calf raises, etc.

If more people would treat the Hammer pieces with respect/take them seriously, they'd see they can be very effective. Even the more hard-core guys where I work out tend to focus on bench and incline pressing lots of weight, then they go to the Hammer Iso-Wide, put only two wheels on each side, and use it to "pump." Oh well :)

I do wish the Iso-Incline would allow you to get a somewhat better stretch at the bottom, but it's a tough machine. I flat benched 370 when I was 19, and I don't think I could put that much up on the Iso-Incline, five years older and 40 lbs. heavier...
 
AAP said:


God bless you for being lucky. That machine is the greatest piece I have ever used. It hits the chest absolutely perfect. No strain on the elbows or lower back (from arching) you just grip and press that baby upwards, and you can literally feel your chest grow.

I also like the Incline and Decline, but I completely agree, that flat press is almost constructed perfect. I do consider myself lucky to have a lot of good equipment at my disposal. I can get really creative with my training schedule.
 
Top Bottom