Hamill was f#ck#n ROBBED

[superman40229]

Hamill beat em down

 

[cipherking]

na he lost bro. after the first round bisbing boxed the hell out of him. he chased him for 2 rounds. i cant understand for the life of me why hamill didnt grab him and keep him down all 3 rounds. stupid

 

[Jacob Creutzfeldt]

I thought it could have gone either way.

 

[canadianhitman]

Bisping didn't win a single round...he MIGHT have earned a draw for round 3, tops. Fixed that one good, they did...I guess growth in the european market means more than integrity.

 

[cipherking]

i thought he lost. its not just the judges. im in philadelphia and u cant get more america then here. to me he lost. u cant chase people around and get jabbed for 5 mins and expect to win.

 

[redsamurai]

It was close........but Bisping won. Hamill didn't do what he does best. I like that his standup has improved, obviously. But it didn't improve enough to make a real statement. He should have shot on Bisping more........and when he did get him down..........one, Bisping got up on him twice, that doesn't look good to the judges......and two, he didn't do any real damage. Bisping was actually more active on his back than he was standing up. But Hamill showed his class after the fight..........where Bisping didn't. I lost a bit of respect for the count after that. I mean, even in the standup.......Hamill was getting to Bisping..........so for Bisping to act like he dominated the fight and Hamill had no business in the octagon with him.........well.........not really classy.

But how about crocop fighting like a man who's terrified of getting KO'ed?? He might be done.........I've never seen him that trepid.

 

[Jacob Creutzfeldt]

Kongo broke one of Crocop's ribs in the first round.

 

[split endz]

Agree that Hamill was robbed. He inflicted more damage, he had several take-downs (Bisping had none), & he pushed the action. Points should be given for all. Bisping did nothing but land some virtually harmless jabs. The first judge had it right : 30 - 27 Hamill.

 

[Jacob Creutzfeldt]

Agree that Hamill was robbed. He inflicted more damage, he had several take-downs (Bisping had none), & he pushed the action. Points should be given for all. Bisping did nothing but land some virtually harmless jabs. The first judge had it right : 30 - 27 Hamill.

I thought Hamill was ripe to be KOd near the end of the third. Hamill never got anything going with the takedowns after the first; he just layed and prayed. Bisping started countering effectively starting in the second round, but really got lit up by Hamill in the first round. You can push the action, but it must be effective agression. Hamill was hitting gloves and missing frequently. Frankly they both started gassing early in the second which makes it tough to determine actual damage.

 

[wordomr]

I totally agree that Hamill was robbed.