Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Gyno

Ok so I finished my cycle which was 600-400 test/deca 12 weeks and was taking arimidex and nolva from about week 7 throughout and I STILL kept getting sore nips and lumps underneath even though I was using a low dose deca with my test. I've done test only cycles before and had no probs with gyno so i know its progesterone induced. So im in PCT now, is it pointless to expect these lumps to shrink now that they're there. Im pretty sure it is, but wanted some vets to gimme it str8. The lumps aren't bigger than my nipples, both sides too. Anyway yes I'm taking clomid 50mg ed and have been taking 60mg nolva ed 1st week PCT. :rolleyes:
If these don't shrink...anyone else have these that isn't getting them taken out? Living with them, and hoping they wont get bigger?
 
I'm just coming off a test cycle, 100mg/day. I got slight gyno during, and am now in to PCT. I've noticed that the lumps have shrunk considerably, almost unnoticable now. I'm doing Adex and Nolva aggressively right now, and it is working. BUT, that's estrogen induced gyno, so I don't know what is going to happen with yours.
 
CrazyK said:
I'm just coming off a test cycle, 100mg/day. I got slight gyno during, and am now in to PCT. I've noticed that the lumps have shrunk considerably, almost unnoticable now. I'm doing Adex and Nolva aggressively right now, and it is working. BUT, that's estrogen induced gyno, so I don't know what is going to happen with yours.

Well im guessing it was the deca, coulda been the test though too...don't know for sure. How big were your lumps, and how long have you been in PCT since you've noticed them shrink...thanks
 
detroitbodybuildertigers said:
Well im guessing it was the deca, coulda been the test though too...don't know for sure. How big were your lumps, and how long have you been in PCT since you've noticed them shrink...thanks
Not very long, a week and a half in to PCT. My lumps, were probably the size of marbles from the feel of them. Now they're 1/4 that size.
 
Wow, I must say as a newbie to the scene it's quite mind boggling all these acronyms, cycles, nicknames for gear, dosages and stacks etc, I need a glossary! ha ha

I dont mean to hijack your thread and hope it's not too dumb a question but what are the best ways to avoid gyno if you were on test or dbol?
 
detroitbodybuildertigers said:
Ok so I finished my cycle which was 600-400 test/deca 12 weeks and was taking arimidex and nolva from about week 7 throughout and I STILL kept getting sore nips and lumps underneath even though I was using a low dose deca with my test. I've done test only cycles before and had no probs with gyno so i know its progesterone induced. So im in PCT now, is it pointless to expect these lumps to shrink now that they're there. Im pretty sure it is, but wanted some vets to gimme it str8. The lumps aren't bigger than my nipples, both sides too. Anyway yes I'm taking clomid 50mg ed and have been taking 60mg nolva ed 1st week PCT. :rolleyes:
If these don't shrink...anyone else have these that isn't getting them taken out? Living with them, and hoping they wont get bigger?

bump bros
 
On muscle chemistry I saw a few bros run an 8 week letro or a-dex cycle with nolva. They had fantastic results. Also some doctors up in new york are trying the nolva + anti aromatase to help with gyno. I believe the statistics were 100% of fatty deposit gyno cleared up, and like 60% of the like lump gyno(calcified?). It will fuck with your lipid values a little, but its better then gyno surgery.

P.S. I also heard of some bros using pgf2a transdermally on the pecs.(injections so close to the stomach would obviously be bad)
 
detroitbodybuildertigers said:
Ok so I finished my cycle which was 600-400 test/deca 12 weeks and was taking arimidex and nolva from about week 7 throughout and I STILL kept getting sore nips and lumps underneath even though I was using a low dose deca with my test. I've done test only cycles before and had no probs with gyno so i know its progesterone induced. So im in PCT now, is it pointless to expect these lumps to shrink now that they're there. Im pretty sure it is, but wanted some vets to gimme it str8. The lumps aren't bigger than my nipples, both sides too. Anyway yes I'm taking clomid 50mg ed and have been taking 60mg nolva ed 1st week PCT. :rolleyes:
If these don't shrink...anyone else have these that isn't getting them taken out? Living with them, and hoping they wont get bigger?


bump
 
detroitbodybuildertigers said:
How long did you have the lumps altogether
4 weeks, I got them half way though my cycle. On another note, this PCT thing aint that bad, I can still get it up fine, and although I'm not as charged in the gym, I can still complete a workout just fine.
 
Sorry about the second post. This is a copy of what I posted in the previous thread, on gyno.

Definately do a nolvadex cycle. Try 20 mgs and if that doesn't work then bump it up to 40 mgs. Gynecomastia is not necessarily permanant.


Beneficial effects of raloxifene and tamoxifen in the treatment of pubertal gynecomastia.

Lawrence SE, Faught KA, Vethamuthu J, Lawson ML.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [email protected]

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of the anti-estrogens tamoxifen and raloxifen in the medical management of persistent pubertal gynecomastia. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of 38 consecutive patients with persistent pubertal gynecomastia who presented to a pediatric endocrinology clinic. Patients received reassurance alone or a 3- to 9-month course of an estrogen receptor modifier (tamoxifen or raloxifene). RESULTS: Mean (SD) age of treated subjects was 14.6 (1.5) years with gynecomastia duration of 28.3 (16.4) months. Mean reduction in breast nodule diameter was 2.1 cm (95% CI 1.7, 2.7, P <.0001) after treatment with tamoxifen and 2.5 cm (95% CI 1.7, 3.3, P <.0001) with raloxifene. Some improvement was seen in 86% of patients receiving tamoxifen and in 91% receiving raloxifene, but a greater proportion had a significant decrease (>50%) with raloxifene (86%) than tamoxifen (41%). No side effects were seen in any patients. CONCLUSION: Inhibition of estrogen receptor action in the breast appears to be safe and effective in reducing persistent pubertal gynecomastia, with a better response to raloxifene than to tamoxifen. Further study is required to determine that this is truly a treatment effect.

PMID: 15238910 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

AIMS: We aimed to confirm suggestions that tamoxifen therapy alone may resolve physiological gynaecomastia. METHODS: A prospective audit of the outcome of tamoxifen routinely given to men with physiological gynaecomastia was carried out at Nottingham. Men referred with gynaecomastia had clinical signs recorded, e.g., type (diffuse 'fatty' or retro-areolar 'lump'), size and possible aetiology. They were offered oral tamoxifen 20mg once daily for 6-12 weeks. On follow-up patients were assessed for complete resolution (CR), partial resolution where patient is satisfied with outcome (PR) or no resolution (NR). Success was either CR or PR. RESULTS: Thirty-six men accepted tamoxifen for physiological gynaecomastia. Median age was 31 (range 18-64). Tenderness was present in 25 (71%) cases. Sixteen men (45%) had 'fatty' gynaecomastia and 20 had 'lump' gynaecomastia. Tamoxifen resolved the mass in 30 patients (83.3%; CR=22, PR=8) and tenderness in 21 cases (84%; CR=0, PR=0). Lump gynaecomastia was more responsive to tamoxifen than the fatty type (100% vs. 62.5%; P=0.0041). CONCLUSIONS: Oral tamoxifen is an effective treatment for physiological gynaecomastia, especially for the lump type.


We evaluated the efficacy of the tamoxifen treatment in 37 patients with pubertal gynecomastia. All had distinct, easily palpable breast swellings with a diameter of over three cm. Pain, tenderness, and swelling associated with gynecomastia were reported by six patients. Eight of the patients were obese. One patient also suffered from varicocele. Pain and size reduction was seen in all patients with tamoxifen treatment. No long-term side effects of tamoxifen were observed. The dose of tamoxifen was increased in three patients due to poor response. Two of the treatment group had recurrence problem at follow-up. We did not need to refer any patient to surgery. Tamoxifen treatment is relatively non-toxic, may be beneficial and we think it should be considered for pubertal gynecomastia.
 
Top Bottom