J
jerseyrugger76
Guest
gjohnson5 said:GW doesn't care about anybody apparently
http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/toxic_fema_trailers
The Sierra Club conducted independent tests on 600 FEMA trailers and mobile homes that were being used along the Gulf Coast. In some extreme cases, formaldehyde levels in the structures were 70 times higher than what is considered safe. Of the FEMA trailers and mobile homes tested by the Sierra Club, only 23 had formaldehyde levels that “were at less than twice the acceptable long-term exposure limit” of 0.008 ppm, and only 9 where below that standard. The majority of the FEMA trailers had levels of .56 ppm, while the formaldehyde detected in mobile homes was also above the threshold, in some cases as high as 0.1 ppm.
The finding that the FEMA mobile homes were just as dangerous as the toxic FEMA trailers was startling. The FEMA mobile homes, which are larger and are meant for long-term use, where considered safer than the FEMA trailers. While FEMA had stopped using the toxic trailers in the summer of 2007, use of mobile homes was still standard practice for the agency. In fact, just weeks prior to the Sierra Club revelations, FEMA had provided mobile homes to the victims of the 2007 California wildfires.
Dude, you get your "news" from a website run by a prosecutorial law firm that's trying to drum up business for a class action suit. I'm LOL'ing over here. There's no incentive for ATTORNEY's to disseminate alarmist information is there? I mean, they couldn't possibly be driven by, I dunno, a profit motive?!