Mavafanculo said:link ?
rnch said:always amazes me when peeps piously slam politicaians here in new orleans..![]()
I hope youre not suggesting he get a pass for this because he doesnt happen to push family values a lot.Mavafanculo said:this wont be fatal - just embarassing and reduce what little respect people had remaining (his approval rating is in the toilet)
he's a corruption / good-government pontificator, not neccessarily a morals family values pontificator so the hypocrasy angle isnt there
If he committed perjury or engaged in a coverup during the ongoing probe into his attempt to tarnish bruno that would bring him down
who is thatAAP said:You think this was the man that was pimping out R-Richard Curtis?
superdave said:I hope youre not suggesting he get a pass for this because he doesnt happen to push family values a lot.
superdave said:who is that
Seems like prosecuting prostitutes (as NY Attorney General), and then later soliciting them would consitute hypocrisy.Mavafanculo said:i could care less what he or any other pol does with his dick. UNLESS he says one thing and attacks the other side on an issue (morals etc) and then does the same thing .
what I'm saying is real-politik, it wont have much impact imo because of the l missing hypocrasy angle - I'm not the guy in charge of handing out passes
Powerbuilder333 said:Seems like prosecuting prostitutes (as NY Attorney General), and then later soliciting them would consitute hypocrisy.
A Washington State Representative is such a prestigious position.AAP said:The crossing dressing Republican that just got caught having anonymous sex in a changing room.
Powerbuilder333 said:Seems like prosecuting prostitutes (as NY Attorney General), and then later soliciting them would consitute hypocrisy.
Mavafanculo said:this wont be fatal - just embarassing and reduce what little respect people had remaining (his approval rating is in the toilet)
he's a corruption / good-government pontificator, not neccessarily a morals family values pontificator so the hypocrasy angle isnt there
If he committed perjury or engaged in a coverup during the ongoing probe into his attempt to tarnish bruno that would bring him down
bluepeter said:What a dumbass.
Probably find out next that he was also trolling for trannies in his spare time.
lartinos said:wow, if you knew him when was attorney general you would be surprised at this. He was one of those guys who spoke like he was cleaning up the state. Ever since he wanted to give illegals licenses I thought he had lost his mind or something. I don't know how he could came back from this, this is marion barber terroritory.
Mavafanculo said:you got a point there - but he didnt campaign on ending prostition -- as many repubs campaign on saving the institution of marraige vs the evil gays and devil hollywood promoting promiscuity etc and then get caught in a men's room stall or cheating on their wife
iow, when you think "eliot spitzer", fighting prostitutes isnt the first thing that comes to mind lol
MightyMouse69 said:WHAT??? are you serious. It's a felony bro, loss of law license, etc...
High priced ladies, will lead to issues related to income and Tax, where did the money come from? He will have to testify in tax evasion cases now too...its endless.
You make enemies by prosecution be certain you will go down HARD.
Mavafanculo said:going to a hooker is a felony? I doubt it.
but no matter, it looks like my initial assessment of the impact may be way wrong --- the local TV news here is playing this like as if he not only had sex with the prostitute, but decapitated her and took her head home with him in a bowling ball bag
story after story - angle after angle - interview after interview ("its interesting when people die, give us dirty laundry") asking if he'll have to resign etc
MightyMouse69 said:the initial investigation was alledgedly for misuse of funds, people were wired, I wouldn't call that a misdemeanor. And he had her delivered to DC bro.
Oh yeah, you forgot he spent a good time of his career as AG investigating and prosecuting prostitution.
Mavafanculo said:the only story I read was patronizing a prostitute, and that wouldnt be a felony -- if it goes beyind that into diverting state funds to pay for it, thats a whole different thing - then it wouldnt matter if he was buying apple pie he's still fucked.
p.s. I'm no spitzer fan.
Mavafanculo said:i could care less what he or any other pol does with his dick. UNLESS he says one thing and attacks the other side on an issue (morals etc) and then does the same thing .
what I'm saying is real-politik, it wont have much impact imo because of the l missing hypocrasy angle - I'm not the guy in charge of handing out passes
mrplunkey said:situational ethics
n. (used with a sing. or pl. verb)
A system of ethics that evaluates acts in light of their situational context rather than by the application of moral absolutes.
see also:
Don't get me wrong... I'd be a huge fan of situational ethics too as long is I was the only one who got to assess the situation.
Mavafanculo said:CH 2 is reporting that he'll resign tonite!
http://wcbstv.com/breakingnewsalerts/spitzer.prostitution.ring.2.673848.html
He'll be prosecuted under "Structuring" statutes (structuring money transfers to hide their true nature) ---
literally and figuretivley?MightyMouse69 said:lot of people having drinks tonite that he fucked.

MightyMouse69 said:Yup, looks like he has(is) negotiated the governorship for a lesser charge...but so much for his future in politics (or in law).
Soon NY will have the blind leading the dumbMavafanculo said:Joe Bruno is dancing a jig right now, but he's up next
spitzer was the only one who could have made bruno seem like a sympathetic character lol
Mavafanculo said:Joe Bruno is dancing a jig right now, but he's up next
spitzer was the only one who could have made bruno seem like a sympathetic character lol
Naw... as long as I'm the one who interprets "the situation", then situational ethics works just great for me.Mavafanculo said:you guys like those thundering moral absolutes. no shades of gray. easy to grasp. no need for thought. comforting.
mrplunkey said:Naw... as long as I'm the one who interprets "the situation", then situational ethics works just great for me.
In all other cases, I'll probably just have to stick with "right" and "wrong".
Exactly. But remember that I've never campaigned on moral absolutes hence I don't have to stick to them.Mavafanculo said:as long as you get to interpret whats right and wrong. got it.
-
mrplunkey said:Exactly. But remember that I've never campaigned on moral absolutes hence I don't have to stick to them.
/snicker
I'm guess the comparison between post #15 and post #53 blew right past you. No worries tho. Remember that just because you aren't politicing against something doesn't make it ok to do it.Mavafanculo said:a simple "touche' " would have cut your losses
mrplunkey said:I'm guess the comparison between post #15 and post #53 blew right past you. No worries tho. Remember that just because you aren't politicing against something doesn't make it ok to do it.
Mavafanculo said:a simple "touche' " would have cut your losses
lolredguru said:Additionally, the affidavit notes that after her appointment with Client-9 ended, "Kristen" spoke with a Emperors Club booker, who said that she had been told that Client-9 "would ask you to do things that, like, you might not think were safe..." "Kristen" responded by saying, essentially, that she could handle guys like that.
Wulfgar is Spitzer?
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










