Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

GH... best every day or EOD?

Gh, better ED or EOD

  • Normal dosing like 4iu/ee

    Votes: 7 100.0%
  • EOD dosing like 8iu/eod

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7

Tux

Well-known member
Most people seem to think ED shots of GH are best but recent literature points to the opposite, higher doses eod. I think Ulter agrees with this? Insead of 4iu's ed, you'd do 8iu's eod? Can't figure out how to post a poll on this, but please chime in if you've done it either way, or preferably both... doses and results please! Also what brand did you use? Thanks in advance and K to all who help out!! :D
 
Tux said:
Most people seem to think ED shots of GH are best but recent literature points to the opposite, higher doses eod. I think Ulter agrees with this? Insead of 4iu's ed, you'd do 8iu's eod? Can't figure out how to post a poll on this, but please chime in if you've done it either way, or preferably both... doses and results please! Also what brand did you use? Thanks in advance and K to all who help out!! :D

The study did infact conclude that the EOD (8 IUs) dosing schedule versus the ED (4 IUs) dosing schedule, based on the same weekly total, was more effective. The main difference would be the higher plasma concentrations achieved by the higher dosage. If one were to use the same weekly total, an EOD dosing schedule would be preferred, based upon the findings in that particular study. I doubt you will find too many people whom have attempted the EOD dosing schedule that can give an accurate and comparative analysis with the two different protocols. Regardless, if you are currently using an ED dosing schedule, switching to EOD should have no negative impact with respect to results. You might as well find out for yourself.

Jenetic
 
Thanks jenetic, that's what I thougt. So this fall I'll run GH 8iu'/day, eod. Will I still break that up 4iu's morning and 4iu's afternoon, or all at once? I assume break it up but just making sure!
 
Of course you're gonna get better results if you double the amount of gh you use. That's not how you do a comparison study. You have to judge things by keeping the doses the same. With everything equal, ED dosing is better than EOD dosing.
 
Outtlaw said:
Of course you're gonna get better results if you double the amount of gh you use. That's not how you do a comparison study. You have to judge things by keeping the doses the same. With everything equal, ED dosing is better than EOD dosing.

Exactly, 8 IUs ED versus 8 IUs EOD will yeild more significant results, regardless of the additional side effects (edema in particular). The EOD dosing schedule does seem to have an advantage over ED when based upon the same total weekly dosage, but this is not necessarily the case when comparing different weekly totals. Insulin usage is mandatory with a higher dosage and ED dosing schedule in order to maximize the results.

Jenetic
 
I tried both EOD and ED. I was able to lean out more using ED dosing. So going forward, I am going to dose EOD when wanting to add a little kick to my cycle...and dose ED when trying to lean out faster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tux
Outlaw, this is NOT doubling the dosage! 8iu every OTHER day is the exact same dosage as 4iu/ed. Both yeild 4iu/day. The question was, which is more effective, 8iu/eod or 4iu/ed? The studies I've read suggest that 8iu/eod is better then 4iu/ed. Wanted EF guys opinions on that. Also, I assume the 8iu's would still be divided up, 4iu's in the am, 4iu's in the PM? Anyone have experience running both? Differences, preferences? K to all who help when I can give it, thanks!
 
Anyone else? From the poll it seems almost all prefer it ED, but I'm guessing that's b/c very VERY few have actually DONE it eod? Jenetic, are there any more studies proving the additional benefits of eod vs ed dosing on GH? Anyone else got opinions?
 
Tux said:
Outlaw, this is NOT doubling the dosage! 8iu every OTHER day is the exact same dosage as 4iu/ed. Both yeild 4iu/day. The question was, which is more effective, 8iu/eod or 4iu/ed? The studies I've read suggest that 8iu/eod is better then 4iu/ed. Wanted EF guys opinions on that. Also, I assume the 8iu's would still be divided up, 4iu's in the am, 4iu's in the PM? Anyone have experience running both? Differences, preferences? K to all who help when I can give it, thanks!
Yes it is doubling the dose. 4iu doubled equals 8. I understand that you're thinking in terms of total weekly dosage, but as I said before, that is NOT how you do a comparative study. When doctors do studies on gh they often do EOD and ED comparisons, but they dont double the dose on the alternate day group.
 
Jenetic said:
Exactly, 8 IUs ED versus 8 IUs EOD will yeild more significant results, regardless of the additional side effects (edema in particular). The EOD dosing schedule does seem to have an advantage over ED when based upon the same total weekly dosage, but this is not necessarily the case when comparing different weekly totals. Insulin usage is mandatory with a higher dosage and ED dosing schedule in order to maximize the results.

Jenetic
Agreed.
 
Tux, so you can learn something... This is how you do a "real" study on the effectivness of ED vs EOD dosing. This is just an excerpt of the study, but as you can see nothing is doubled. Both groups are given 6mg or 18iu of gh.


Research into human growth hormone to treat fat and metabolic changes


Moyle presented a randomised, double-blind study of 757 people with AIDS wasting who were randomised to one of three arms: 6mg recombinant human growth hormone (r-HGH) daily; 6mg r-HGH on alternative days, or placebo. Evaluation of 555 people taking antiretroviral therapy who completed 12 weeks of treatment showed r-HGH was effective in increasing lean body mass, improving physical performance and improving quality of life in HIV-positive people with AIDS wasting. Average increase in lean body mass was 5.21kg in the daily treatment group and 3.33kg in the alternate group (both p<0.001). Total body mass by DXA scan fell by -1.41kg in the daily treatment group and by -1.23kg in the alternate group (p<0.001). Similarly, total trunk mass also fell significantly in the two treatment groups, by -1.04kg and -0.80kg. Overall weight increased by about 3kg in the daily group and 2kg in the alternate group. Approximately 20-30% of r-HGH recipients experienced joint and muscle pain while fluid retention occurred among a third of people receiving daily treatment. Serious side-effects associated with r-HGH included skin cancers, Buerger's disease (inflammation of the arteries usually associated with smoking which can lead to pain and gangrene of the limb), development of breasts in men, and gastrointestinal bleeding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tux
Outtlaw said:
Yes it is doubling the dose. 4iu doubled equals 8. I understand that you're thinking in terms of total weekly dosage, but as I said before, that is NOT how you do a comparative study. When doctors do studies on gh they often do EOD and ED comparisons, but they dont double the dose on the alternate day group.

are you saying that the 8iu EOD would yeild better results than the 4iu ED even though it is about the same weekly dosage?
 
informed09 said:
are you saying that the 8iu EOD would yeild better results than the 4iu ED even though it is about the same weekly dosage?
Yes I think the results would be better, but by how much I cant say. And since people dont do scientific studies by giving people different doses, who could say for sure. But I dont know why anyone would want to do 4iu of gh in the 1st place. I think you'd be better off putting your money elswhere.
 
Outlaw, I'm still not getting something. That study proved NOTHING. It said you get BETTER results doing 6mg ED instead of 6mg eod, which is HALF the dosage. So obviously if I did 4iu/day vs 4iu/eod I'd get fewer results on the eod b/c total weekly dosage is only half. I asked if you took 4iu/day or 8iu/eod, the SAME weekly dosage, which yeilds better results. Find me a study on that and I'll attach some possible validity to it, the study you posted gives me nothing I didn't know already. Still I gave you K for the research :)
 
That's the problem, I've never seen a study that's done like that. They always normally keep the doses the same. We can only speculate on what the results would be. It's quite obvious that 8iu EOD will yeild better results than 4iu ED, but by how much I dont know. I highly doubt the results at 8iu EOD would be double that of 4iu/day, but I believe they will be somewhat better.
 
Outtlaw said:
That's the problem, I've never seen a study that's done like that. They always normally keep the doses the same. We can only speculate on what the results would be. It's quite obvious that 8iu EOD will yeild better results than 4iu ED, but by how much I dont know. I highly doubt the results at 8iu EOD would be double that of 4iu/day, but I believe they will be somewhat better.

Better for loosing fat or gaing mass, or both? If you are running GH at low doses(4iu) isnt it geared more towards loosing fat?
 
informed09 said:
Better for loosing fat or gaing mass, or both? If you are running GH at low doses(4iu) isnt it geared more towards loosing fat?
I guess that depends on who you ask. I dont run gh for fat burning purposes (I think there are better options for that). If I had to guess, I'd say that overall results (mass gains and lipolysis) at 8iu EOD would probably be around 20% better than 4iu/day.
 
Guess next time I run GH, I'll try 8iu/eod instead of 4iu/ed and see what happens. At least this way I only have to do sub-q injects eod... not that those hurt a single bit, but meh :)
 
Outtlaw said:
I guess that depends on who you ask. I dont run gh for fat burning purposes (I think there are better options for that). If I had to guess, I'd say that overall results (mass gains and lipolysis) at 8iu EOD would probably be around 20% better than 4iu/day.

That is interesting to know that you can get around 20% better results at about the same weekly dose. What is the shortest amount of time you would run gh? And if doing it every other day would you split up the dose( one in the morn, one in afternoon)?
 
informed09 said:
That is interesting to know that you can get around 20% better results at about the same weekly dose. What is the shortest amount of time you would run gh? And if doing it every other day would you split up the dose( one in the morn, one in afternoon)?
I say that only because of the significant jump in dose. I dont think you would see any difference on alternate day dosing between 2 and 4iu. I think you'll see a slight difference between 4 and 8iu, and a moderate difference between 8 and 16iu.

How long would I run gh? That would depend on the dose I was using and the amount of risk I wanted to take with side effects. But for me 12-16wks is pretty much the minimum.
 
Outtlaw said:
I say that only because of the significant jump in dose. I dont think you would see any difference on alternate day dosing between 2 and 4iu. I think you'll see a slight difference between 4 and 8iu, and a moderate difference between 8 and 16iu.

How long would I run gh? That would depend on the dose I was using and the amount of risk I wanted to take with side effects. But for me 12-16wks is pretty much the minimum.

One or two injections per day?
 
I would assume you would do 8iu/eod, and still divide it up, 4iu in the am, 4iu in the pm, but I could be totally wrong. SOMEbody please answer this last question! :)
 
Jenetic said:
The study did infact conclude that the EOD (8 IUs) dosing schedule versus the ED (4 IUs) dosing schedule, based on the same weekly total, was more effective. The main difference would be the higher plasma concentrations achieved by the higher dosage. If one were to use the same weekly total, an EOD dosing schedule would be preferred, based upon the findings in that particular study. I doubt you will find too many people whom have attempted the EOD dosing schedule that can give an accurate and comparative analysis with the two different protocols. Regardless, if you are currently using an ED dosing schedule, switching to EOD should have no negative impact with respect to results. You might as well find out for yourself.

Jenetic

Sorry guys, there have never been studies done on adult athletes with respect to HGH...the studies refered to were done on growth hormone deficient children..to cut a long story short the EOD theory only arose due to the kids on EOD still having their small amount of natty GH after 2 years straight whilst those on ED (not 5/2) had natty shut down... Most BBs do not do 2 years straight and at 5/2 your natty GH is allowed the same restbite on the 2 as EOD.... IMO 5/2 rocks...
Ed
 
ed2005 said:
Sorry guys, there have never been studies done on adult athletes with respect to HGH...the studies refered to were done on growth hormone deficient children..to cut a long story short the EOD theory only arose due to the kids on EOD still having their small amount of natty GH after 2 years straight whilst those on ED (not 5/2) had natty shut down... Most BBs do not do 2 years straight and at 5/2 your natty GH is allowed the same restbite on the 2 as EOD.... IMO 5/2 rocks...
Ed
The study I posted up was done on HIV/AIDS patients for building lean body mass. Which is exactly what we try to do as bodybuilders. But I do like the the 5 on 2 off dosing, and that's how I prefer to use gh.
 
Outtlaw said:
The study I posted up was done on HIV/AIDS patients for building lean body mass. Which is exactly what we try to do as bodybuilders. But I do like the the 5 on 2 off dosing, and that's how I prefer to use gh.

I have heard good things with 5/2. but my question is should you do it once or twice a day? what time also? am/pm??
 
informed09 said:
I have heard good things with 5/2. but my question is should you do it once or twice a day? what time also? am/pm??

IMO, it depends on the dosage, anything over 3/4ius should be split....
You can also spot inject for fat reduction...100% fact... I experimented with chest fat....One side for a week and then marked the difference...the injected side had visably less fat than the other...I swaped round and bingo...the same...I also reconstitute with 2mls of bacs water...it dilutes the mix more and allieviates sides.... I also shoot 2 hours before training and not first thing in the morn...this alieviates the lethargy/tiredness sides...
Just my 2cents, hope it helps
Ed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tux
At the end of the day I really dont think it makes any difference. I'd just do whatever is easier for you. And if you're using insulin, then it's probably easier to dose your gh around the slin.
 
ed2005 said:
IMO, it depends on the dosage, anything over 3/4ius should be split....
You can also spot inject for fat reduction...100% fact... I experimented with chest fat....One side for a week and then marked the difference...the injected side had visably less fat than the other...I swaped round and bingo...the same...I also reconstitute with 2mls of bacs water...it dilutes the mix more and allieviates sides.... I also shoot 2 hours before training and not first thing in the morn...this alieviates the lethargy/tiredness sides...
Just my 2cents, hope it helps
Ed

What brand and doses do you/have you used? what is considered to be the best out there? I know peoples opinions will vary depending on what they used.
 
So, what's best? 4iu/day straight through, 4iu/day 5on20ff, 8iu/eod? Give me your opinions and I'll try whichever one gets the most positives. I've done 2iu/ed, 7 days a week before, but only 3 months so I don't really count that. Which would be best for bulking, and which for fat-loss? K to all I can give it to!
 
Guys EOD may work for some and everyday may work better for others. Correct me if I am wrong but doesn't everyone's body respond differently to drugs. I am currently running 3ius 5 days 2 off since March. There are studies out there that say that this method is better in that it won't completely shut down your Pituitary Gland. This info was given to me from my HRT Doc. To be honest with you if I had the $$$ I would prob. increase to 5ius everyday. I guess we all have to do what works best for our bods as individuals. Does anyone know if there has ever been a study done on Bodybuilders/weightlifters? Let's face it studys that have been done on Aids patients are kinda silly IMO. Do you really think that an Aids patient is training 5 days a week, eating over 200 gms of protein,watching his sodium intake etc. Just my 2 cents
 
So basically, no one knows. Oh well, I guess I'll be the guinea-pig... I usually am anyway :) Thanks for the replies!
 
The problem with the question is, no one really knows. There is zero research on bodybuilders or other athletes. There is not a lot of research on adults period.

Most seem to go with 5 on 2 off. But I don't think there is much research behind that. It may have started as a way to save money.

Again...no one knows for sure, but with most drugs, you want to get an even as possible blood level. So it would seem ed would beat eod. It would also seem, that given the short t1/2 , multiple injections per day would be better than one. However, like I said no one really knows....

Now, if I had the cash, I'd take 2I.U., 4-5 times a day, 7 days a week and keep increasing the dose until I couldn't take the sides. If I had the cash........
 
With gh, ED dosing is always better than EOD, all the studies prove that. 5 on 2 off is good if you want to save money and give yourself a short break from the gh, sides, or whatever. Now, is 5x2 better than ED? No. Will there be much difference between the two? Probably not.

Now when you talk about changing the doses and saying if I take X amount of gh ED, can I take 2X EOD and get better results... who really knows. What we do know is that ED dosing gives better results than EOD dosing, so if you decide to go EOD expect your results to be less. If you look at that study I posted, the lean mass gains for the alternate day group were over 60% less than the gains for the daily group. What you have to determine is if that 60% loss in gains from alternate day dosing will still be more than your gains from using half the dose on a daily basis. The problem is that the gains you make from such minimal doses of gh are gonna be so low, that it's really not even worth it. Personally, I think gh is too expensive to be experimenting with it for chance results.

Obviously you guys are posing these questions because you want decent or better results from gh, that you may not be getting. I've said time and time again, if you expect something significant from 2-4iu of gh you're wasting your time and money.
 
bigjd69 said:
Does anyone know if there has ever been a study done on Bodybuilders/weightlifters? Let's face it studys that have been done on Aids patients are kinda silly IMO. Do you really think that an Aids patient is training 5 days a week, eating over 200 gms of protein,watching his sodium intake etc. Just my 2 cents
I dont think they are silly at all, and in fact I believe they can teach us a thing or two about gh. And it doesnt make a difference weather they are training or not. Results dont lie. The fact is that there are many HIV/AIDS patients that use the same drugs we use as bodybuilders. And as bodybuilders we often use 2-3 times the amounts that they use.
 
informed09 said:
What brand and doses do you/have you used? what is considered to be the best out there? I know peoples opinions will vary depending on what they used.

Currently using jintropin at 3ius per day 5on 2 off...It works for me....I have also used Saizen and to be honest I think the Saizen was superior but far more expensive..so the Jinnos are better value for your buck... Humotrope is up there with the best but again not enough difference in results when conidering the vastly elevated price in comparison to Jinnos...
Cheers
Ed
 
Article I posted at AF....not sure if this is the same study you all are referring to:





Sup everyone !

haven't posted in a little bit.



I know there are a few GH gurus here. I saw this on another board and wanted to know your thoughts. Check this out:



EOD GH injections are better!..... study says

A very thorough well controlled 4 year study published on
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No.8 3573-3577
clearly shows every other day (EOD) hGH injections to be much more beneficial in
the long run to everyday injections. Everyday injections seems to drastically lower
your body's sensitivity to it's own GH secretion. The study included children with idiopathic
short stature, but can be ever casting on us, normal non-deficient hGH individuals who
may use hGH periodically for bodybuilding, sports and health purposes.

The 38 children were divided into 2 groups:
Group I received daily hGH injections.
Group II received alternate day hGH injections.

It is important to note that the total weekly dosage of hGH
was the same for both groups.

Both groups received the hGH therapy contiguously for 2 years.
Their natural growth was followed for an additional 2 years after hGH therapy ended.
They were all measured at 3-month intervals during the 4 years period (2 years
with hGH therapy and 2 years after). Their Serum GH was measured by double antibody RIA kit.

During hGH therapy, both groups accelerated their growth substantially.
Group I receiving the daily hGH injections first & second year velocity was 3.4 and 2.3 SD
Group II receiving the alternate hGH inj. had 3.0 and 2.0 SD for first and second year respectively.

Over the initial 6 months after withdrawal of therapy, growth velocity decelerated to a low nadir -3.9 SD score
for the daily therapy group, whereas it decelerated in the alternate day group to only -0.2 SD score.

During the 2 years off therapy, the later group (taking EOD injections)
maintained growth rates of -0.2 to -1.2 SD score, which is similar to their SD score prior to the hGH treatment.
The daily group also recovered but very slowly, on the fourth semiannual evaluation off therapy.
The cumulative 4-year growth velocity (2yrs on and 2 yrs off therapy) of the alternate day group was greater
than that of the daily therapy group (mean, 0.9 vs. 0.3 SD score).

At the end of the 4-yr therapy period, the adult height prediction of the alternate day group was greater
than that of the daily group by a mea of 6.5cm (that's over 2.5" in height, quite a lot of difference)

In even simpler English, to translate what it may mean to us is that using hGH everyday will only
negligibly give better short-term results. Yet using alternate day hGH will give radically better long-term
results and much better recovery. As the body may get back to homeostasis much faster.

Remember the two groups got the same weekly total hGH dosage,
so your every other day hGH injections would be twice as if you used
it every day.

The researchers said, the dose was of less impotency than the schedule of the injections.
Daily hGH therapy for 3 years caused subnormal growth persisting for 1.5 years (very bad)

It may be that the problem is not enough hGH or IGF-1 secretion but rather
the body's decreased sensitivity to it. The interesting part is that the serum GH levels
and serum IGF-I and IGF-binding protein remained unaffected or relatively mutely affected.
Even your body's endogenous pulsatile secretion of GH resumes within just days
even after long-term hGH therapy.

The researchers hypothesis is that the tolerance may be in the "GH signal transduction in
selective target organs in response to the disappearance of the unique pulsatile
pattern of serum GH during GH therapy". You see, hGH taken via sc injections
do not imitate the your body's own GH secretion.
"Indeed, daily sc administration of GH results in an unphysiological serum GH profile, with peak
levels at 4 h and a slow decline over the course of the following 12–24 h. This pattern can be
regarded as continuous administration, rather than the physiological GH pulses,
with a frequency of about eight per day."
"Assuming that the withdrawal syndrome is related to tolerance that might have developed toward
hGH or IGF-I, we tried to prevent it by alternate day treatment. Moreover, hGH doses used in
therapy often stimulate IGF-I to supraphysiological serum levels, suggesting that target
tissues IGF-I may also be higher than normal. The mechanism seems, therefore, to rest
with hGH and IGF-I action at their target tissues. We now show that alternate day therapy
with hGH in children with an intact GH-IGF-I axis prevents the withdrawal syndrome"

Researchers mark the analogy to another endocrine tolerance and withdrawal syndrome:
"alternate day therapy with glucocoricoids prevents tolerance to that hormone to a substantial degree,
"Interestingly, glucocoricoids withdrawal syndrome can also occur while the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is intact (, indicating that tolerance to glucocoricoids has developed
at the target organ level (9). "

An example of a good safe protocol to follow in my opinion could be

hGH taken for 4 months (16 weeks) or more at 8IU every other day,
split to 4IU three hours after waking up (say 11:00am)
and another 4IU taken 4 hours later (say 3:00pm).
This approach is quite conservative and may be optimal.

Obviously, you may extend past 4months, and take more IUs per day.
This approach goes with 8IU EOD, so it is equivalent to folks that would
otherwise go with 4IU ED, which is what most do.

There is some controversy as to how many of these IUs the body
can utilize at once

Obviously, there are lot of studies, some better conducted, some less.
Lots of opinions and doctrines in endocrinology, bodybuilding etc..
So you should make your own decision, I guess old individuals on
hGH for life would not mind, as no rebound would affect them. Professional
bodybuilders probably wouldn't mind as well.

I would rather follow a protocol like this. For most part due to the
nasty rebound that I could get after withdrawing from long-term ED hGH treatment.
Nothing worse then look awesome, stop hGH then after several months having:
Low body sensitivity to your own body's GH.
Slow recovery
Decline in resting cardiac output
Increase fat mass
Decrease in metabolic rate
Negative nitrogen balance, phosphorus, sodium and potassium.

Again, I said "could" not "would", because this study cannot absolutely manifest
our use of hGH. Moreso, we are not children, we are not idiopathic hGH deficient
and not aGHD. But since the weekly dosages do remain the same as well as the
duration of the hGH usage. Just changing to the EOD protocol from the well
hyped everyday inj protocol is worth in my honest opinion. It seems statistically
a better bet, with more chance to win, than loose as opposed to the ED protocol.

I just tried to summarize the findings of the study, which was by the way,
a pleasure to read as the study is well written and was prepared by
Dr Hochberg, MD, a renowned well respected figure in endocrinology.

You can read the full article with all the graphs and details here:
http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/87/8/3573
With references to 23 studies.

Here are some interesting graphs:

http://jcem.endojournals.org/conten...g0828721002.gif
This graph shows the difference growth velocity difference pre GH treatment, and at the
end of the trial, 4 years after (2 years after withdrawal from GH treatment)
The dark bar marks the alternate day injections. The light bar marks the every day injections,
note that the every day injections group saw worse long-term (4 yrs) results as opposed
to the alternate day group.

http://jcem.endojournals.org/conten...g0828721003.gif
This graph shows the annual bone age advancement in children treated with
alternate GH injections and daily injections.
The light bar marks the every day injections, the dark bar the alternate day injections.
In first two years (the years they were taking hGH), take a look at the relatively
small advantage ED injections gave over the EOD inj, as opposed to the 2 years
after withdrawal of the treatment. The EOD group shows
 
2ez said:
Article I posted at AF....not sure if this is the same study you all are referring to:





Sup everyone !

haven't posted in a little bit.



I know there are a few GH gurus here. I saw this on another board and wanted to know your thoughts. Check this out:
That study is complete crap as far as Im concerned. And besides, it clearly pointed out that the daily injection group got better results over the alternate day injection group while on gh. The issue that study is based on is the return of growth rates after gh admistration is stopped, which has absolutely no merit for me because I dont take gh to get taller like these children in the study. So bottom line, gh EOD is better for kids with growth problems because it allows their natural growth rates to return to nomal much quicker.
 
2ez said:
Article I posted at AF....not sure if this is the same study you all are referring to:





Sup everyone !

haven't posted in a little bit.



I know there are a few GH gurus here. I saw this on another board and wanted to know your thoughts. Check this out:



EOD GH injections are better!..... study says

A very thorough well controlled 4 year study published on
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No.8 3573-3577
clearly shows every other day (EOD) hGH injections to be much more beneficial in
the long run to everyday injections. Everyday injections seems to drastically lower
your body's sensitivity to it's own GH secretion. The study included children with idiopathic
short stature, but can be ever casting on us, normal non-deficient hGH individuals who
may use hGH periodically for bodybuilding, sports and health purposes.

The 38 children were divided into 2 groups:
Group I received daily hGH injections.
Group II received alternate day hGH injections.

It is important to note that the total weekly dosage of hGH
was the same for both groups.

Both groups received the hGH therapy contiguously for 2 years.
Their natural growth was followed for an additional 2 years after hGH therapy ended.
They were all measured at 3-month intervals during the 4 years period (2 years
with hGH therapy and 2 years after). Their Serum GH was measured by double antibody RIA kit.

During hGH therapy, both groups accelerated their growth substantially.
Group I receiving the daily hGH injections first & second year velocity was 3.4 and 2.3 SD
Group II receiving the alternate hGH inj. had 3.0 and 2.0 SD for first and second year respectively.

Over the initial 6 months after withdrawal of therapy, growth velocity decelerated to a low nadir -3.9 SD score
for the daily therapy group, whereas it decelerated in the alternate day group to only -0.2 SD score.

During the 2 years off therapy, the later group (taking EOD injections)
maintained growth rates of -0.2 to -1.2 SD score, which is similar to their SD score prior to the hGH treatment.
The daily group also recovered but very slowly, on the fourth semiannual evaluation off therapy.
The cumulative 4-year growth velocity (2yrs on and 2 yrs off therapy) of the alternate day group was greater
than that of the daily therapy group (mean, 0.9 vs. 0.3 SD score).

At the end of the 4-yr therapy period, the adult height prediction of the alternate day group was greater
than that of the daily group by a mea of 6.5cm (that's over 2.5" in height, quite a lot of difference)

In even simpler English, to translate what it may mean to us is that using hGH everyday will only
negligibly give better short-term results. Yet using alternate day hGH will give radically better long-term
results and much better recovery. As the body may get back to homeostasis much faster.

Remember the two groups got the same weekly total hGH dosage,
so your every other day hGH injections would be twice as if you used
it every day.

The researchers said, the dose was of less impotency than the schedule of the injections.
Daily hGH therapy for 3 years caused subnormal growth persisting for 1.5 years (very bad)

It may be that the problem is not enough hGH or IGF-1 secretion but rather
the body's decreased sensitivity to it. The interesting part is that the serum GH levels
and serum IGF-I and IGF-binding protein remained unaffected or relatively mutely affected.
Even your body's endogenous pulsatile secretion of GH resumes within just days
even after long-term hGH therapy.

The researchers hypothesis is that the tolerance may be in the "GH signal transduction in
selective target organs in response to the disappearance of the unique pulsatile
pattern of serum GH during GH therapy". You see, hGH taken via sc injections
do not imitate the your body's own GH secretion.
"Indeed, daily sc administration of GH results in an unphysiological serum GH profile, with peak
levels at 4 h and a slow decline over the course of the following 12–24 h. This pattern can be
regarded as continuous administration, rather than the physiological GH pulses,
with a frequency of about eight per day."
"Assuming that the withdrawal syndrome is related to tolerance that might have developed toward
hGH or IGF-I, we tried to prevent it by alternate day treatment. Moreover, hGH doses used in
therapy often stimulate IGF-I to supraphysiological serum levels, suggesting that target
tissues IGF-I may also be higher than normal. The mechanism seems, therefore, to rest
with hGH and IGF-I action at their target tissues. We now show that alternate day therapy
with hGH in children with an intact GH-IGF-I axis prevents the withdrawal syndrome"

Researchers mark the analogy to another endocrine tolerance and withdrawal syndrome:
"alternate day therapy with glucocoricoids prevents tolerance to that hormone to a substantial degree,
"Interestingly, glucocoricoids withdrawal syndrome can also occur while the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is intact (, indicating that tolerance to glucocoricoids has developed
at the target organ level (9). "

An example of a good safe protocol to follow in my opinion could be

hGH taken for 4 months (16 weeks) or more at 8IU every other day,
split to 4IU three hours after waking up (say 11:00am)
and another 4IU taken 4 hours later (say 3:00pm).
This approach is quite conservative and may be optimal.

Obviously, you may extend past 4months, and take more IUs per day.
This approach goes with 8IU EOD, so it is equivalent to folks that would
otherwise go with 4IU ED, which is what most do.

There is some controversy as to how many of these IUs the body
can utilize at once

Obviously, there are lot of studies, some better conducted, some less.
Lots of opinions and doctrines in endocrinology, bodybuilding etc..
So you should make your own decision, I guess old individuals on
hGH for life would not mind, as no rebound would affect them. Professional
bodybuilders probably wouldn't mind as well.

I would rather follow a protocol like this. For most part due to the
nasty rebound that I could get after withdrawing from long-term ED hGH treatment.
Nothing worse then look awesome, stop hGH then after several months having:
Low body sensitivity to your own body's GH.
Slow recovery
Decline in resting cardiac output
Increase fat mass
Decrease in metabolic rate
Negative nitrogen balance, phosphorus, sodium and potassium.

Again, I said "could" not "would", because this study cannot absolutely manifest
our use of hGH. Moreso, we are not children, we are not idiopathic hGH deficient
and not aGHD. But since the weekly dosages do remain the same as well as the
duration of the hGH usage. Just changing to the EOD protocol from the well
hyped everyday inj protocol is worth in my honest opinion. It seems statistically
a better bet, with more chance to win, than loose as opposed to the ED protocol.

I just tried to summarize the findings of the study, which was by the way,
a pleasure to read as the study is well written and was prepared by
Dr Hochberg, MD, a renowned well respected figure in endocrinology.

You can read the full article with all the graphs and details here:
http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/87/8/3573
With references to 23 studies.

Here are some interesting graphs:

http://jcem.endojournals.org/conten...g0828721002.gif
This graph shows the difference growth velocity difference pre GH treatment, and at the
end of the trial, 4 years after (2 years after withdrawal from GH treatment)
The dark bar marks the alternate day injections. The light bar marks the every day injections,
note that the every day injections group saw worse long-term (4 yrs) results as opposed
to the alternate day group.

http://jcem.endojournals.org/conten...g0828721003.gif
This graph shows the annual bone age advancement in children treated with
alternate GH injections and daily injections.
The light bar marks the every day injections, the dark bar the alternate day injections.
In first two years (the years they were taking hGH), take a look at the relatively
small advantage ED injections gave over the EOD inj, as opposed to the 2 years
after withdrawal of the treatment. The EOD group shows

You wrote this article?

Jenetic
 
I wrote this article, not the research.
Just simplified the facts as the research showed them and linked to the original text and graphs. At least give credit to people who deserve it.
The research was made by a very well known figure in the endocrinology field, Dr. Hochberg, I've seen some other works of his. Very thorough.

JUNK
 
Yip, that's the report I was refering to and that created the stir..If you read it very carefully you will see that it has absolutely no bearing on athletes or BBs..It was done on 38 Gh deficient children with a view to establishing them growing in height and structure....
Also the only negative on the ED was the aftershock of not producing GH the same naturally after 2-4years...Which BB is gonna go for 2 years straight anyway...
Also the report states ED verses EOD, not 5/2...When the 5/2 system is taken into consideration it allows for your body to produce it's own natty supply on the off days...
Ed
 
Top Bottom