George, please

[spentagn]

Strongchick's posts are REALLY getting old. I am not calling for her to be banned, but I don't think treatment of her and former members (such as BOS) is equitable. All of her recent posts have involved some sort of racial hatred. As Cornholio mentioned, many of us who DO support the board AND want it to be a better place are getting fed up with this racial intollerance.

 

[bouncer]

Excellent post which requires some thought and consideration by those in authority here.

Bouncer

 

[BigJay81]

I actually agree!!!

now spentgan that may ruin your chnces but I hope not.

Good Looking out for the board,
J

 

[68GT350]

Strongchick is an asset to our board who's threads are often thought provoking. They never stay under 3 pages. However, her posts as of late are plain nasty.

 

[spentagn]

smalls' posts rarely stay under 3 pages, but rarely if ever provoke thought. And when you have your head up your ass, people tend to call you on it. Like I said, I'm not calling to have her banned, but the last couple of days have represented a degredation of the chat board.

 

[MommaKin]

What does Smalls have to do with this? I'm sorry if I missed it.
Can you explain.

smalls' posts rarely stay under 3 pages, but rarely if ever provoke thought. And when you have your head up your ass, people tend to call you on it. Like I said, I'm not calling to have her banned, but the last couple of days have represented a degredation of the chat board.

 

[spentagn]

I was responding to 68GT350 saying that sc is an asset, and providing a correlation that because her threads rarely stay under three pages, it shows how she is usually thought provoking. Smalls has nothing to do with the racist threads, but many of her threads receive tons of replies, and few have any content. Most are guys just trying to get nude pics from her. I'm not saying that smalls isn't an asset to the board, just that thread length doesn't imply thought provocation.

 

[MommaKin]

I agree....thread length does not imply thought provocation

 

[manny78]

I agree but if I think she deserves to be banned. She brought nothing to the board but provocation. I know one Mod tried to have her banned. just hope the next time will be the good one.

 

[68GT350]

Guys...we're just banning too many people. If you don't like it, ignore it. That's what i'm trying to say. People are way too quick to ban people these days. She's not violating the TOS. Spent, I think you should swing over her house and give her a verbal thrashing she'll never forget!

 

[spentagn]

That's why I'm not suggesting she be banned. An email from the powers that be would probably serve its purpose.

 

[68GT350]

girls will be girls. She's got a bug up her ass.

 

[Thaibox]

There is a huge difference between provoking thought and stirring shit. She seems only capable of the latter.

 

[drrman]

i just read her posts and never reply, but i don't think theres a place here for that kind of "crap"