nordstrom said:
The fact that you condemn all homosexuals for the acts of a few essentially de-values whatever argument you could have made.
]
exactly
what type pf reactio do expect with a title insinuating that gays and lesbians are the pioneers of bringing handicapped babies into the world on purpose
i remember seeing a program years ago about a heterosexual couple who said they wanted their child to be deaf because they were for much the same reasons, they dont see it as a handicap.
now if they were to have a child, would it be any more or less acceptable?
they didnt handicap the child, the child was born that way because the father was deaf. because he is deaf, should he be witheld from donating his sperm
should his genetic makeup be used to prejudice his right to help other procreate? when a couple chooses a donor, one of the things they select is genetic traits/makeup....should this be any different? remember the child wasnt guaranteed to be deaf. how could you prove there werent other reasons for him being the donor
if they had knocked knees the old fashioned way would it be any different? if she had chosen a deaf mate in the knowledge heer child stood a 50% chance of deafness, is it any different.
i personally dont understand why they would take joy in bringing a child into the world who is sense-impaired, but ethically i dont think they should have been prevented in doing so