Tarheel
New member
On the majority of your bodybuilding exercises, would you say you do full ROM or mostly partial (not locking out, not all the way down, etc).
I'm really torn on this issue so I'm looking for opinions and info on to why you prefer which.
Hypertrophy of the sarcomere occurs due to the damage done to them by lifting weights, right? So instead of taking a lighter weight and moving it through a total range of motion, wouldn't it be more productive (damaging to the contractile protiens) if you took a heavier weight but only moved it across the sticking point, or hardest part of the ROM?
The energy saved by only doing a smaller ROM would allow higher reps with a heavier weight than you could use by doing a full ROM.
But I'm sure there's a good arguement for a full ROM, which is why I'm asking
I'm really torn on this issue so I'm looking for opinions and info on to why you prefer which.
Hypertrophy of the sarcomere occurs due to the damage done to them by lifting weights, right? So instead of taking a lighter weight and moving it through a total range of motion, wouldn't it be more productive (damaging to the contractile protiens) if you took a heavier weight but only moved it across the sticking point, or hardest part of the ROM?
The energy saved by only doing a smaller ROM would allow higher reps with a heavier weight than you could use by doing a full ROM.
But I'm sure there's a good arguement for a full ROM, which is why I'm asking

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










