Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Fro. Prolactin, PR, Fina. Help with answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Golfer18--old
  • Start date Start date
.
Been 5 days... where's Fonz Looking forward to reading up!

My God, do you really think there are answers to questions like "How do I stop tren induced gyno?" that are based on reproducible results from well controlled scientific studies? It is not even known how many anabolic steroids, like the ones that only bind weakly to the androgen receptor for example, really work. How many human studies do you think there are for a compound (tren) that is not even approved for use in humans?


Maybe if masses of people started coming down with gyno from eating tren contaminated beef there would be grant money available for studying this problem. Until then everything you hear, even from people that you may regard as "gurus" will be speculation
 
nandi12 said:
.

My God, do you really think there are answers to questions like "How do I stop tren induced gyno?" that are based on reproducible results from well controlled scientific studies? It is not even known how many anabolic steroids, like the ones that only bind weakly to the androgen receptor for example, really work. How many human studies do you think there are for a compound (tren) that is not even approved for use in humans?


Maybe if masses of people started coming down with gyno from eating tren contaminated beef there would be grant money available for studying this problem. Until then everything you hear, even from people that you may regard as "gurus" will be speculation

Good point.
 
Nandi,

First, you are way off base accusing me of "looking for the answer." If it was that easy, I'd make a few 1 sentence interrogative posts a day and get all my answers here. I like to read opinions.

Opinions: beliefs or conclusions held with confidence but not substantiated by positive knowledge or proof.

That's right, I read them and I make my own decisions based on knowledge that I read from other factual sources such as medical journals and the like. I think the opinions here have helped many people, don't you?

Secondly, why do you condemn those actually looking for an answer, while making lengthy cited posts of your own in the same thread?

Me thinks someone wants to attain "guru" status, as well.

Lastly, please don't take this post as a stab at you, your post just struck me as a little offensive towards me and I thought I'd clear it up so that you didn't have a negative view towards my desire for more knowledge (or opinions, anyway :) ).
 
nandi12 said:
..

Panerai, once again you are confusing pubertal gynecomastia with drug induced gynecomastia. I thought this thread was concerned with the latter. The medical literature is replete with case studies of prolactin induced gynecomastia resulting from a variety of drugs. I have reproduced one abstract as an example...

Pharmacopsychiatry 1999 Jan;32(1):41

Gynecomastia with risperidone-fluoxetine combination.

Benazzi F.

Department of Psychiatry Public Hospital Morgagni Forli, Italy.

Gynecomastia (breast enlargement) is a side effect of neuroleptic antipsychotic drugs, related to prolactin elevation caused by
dopamine D2 receptor blockade (Richelson, 1996). The atypical antipsychotic risperidone is less likely to cause gynecomastia at low doses (Casey, 1996). It can cause a dose-dependent increase in serum prolactin concentration (Peuskens, 1995), by blocking dopamine D2 receptors (Richelson, 1996). I would like to describe a patient who did not have gynecomastia with risperidone at a dose of 3 mg/day, but had it when risperidone, at a dose of 0.5 mg/day, was combined with fluoxetine. A MEDLINE search failed to find any reports about such an interaction.

Finally, someone SAW THIS..........LOL

Fonz
 
HighIntensity said:



Good Idea, im going to take my 44 cc's of tren and dump it right now.

please it can't be this complex.

I think were all going overboard, with this gyno and fina thing. Yes it can happen, but its rare.

Case in point.......YOURS TRULY...LOL

26-weeks STRAIGHT on HIGH Fina dosages(for a while
anyways), and ZERO.......just rock-solid nipples.

Bromo(2.5mgs/day) WILL take care of 99% of all Fina gyno sufferers.

Thats my assessment.

Oh, and drop the Vitex in the garbage. WORTHLESS.

Fonz
 
Last edited:
nandi12 said:
Here is an avenue that has not been explored in this thread: The potential relationship between trenbolone, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and prolactin. TRH stimulates the synthesis and release of thyrotropin (thyroid stimulating hormone) from the pituitary. Thyrotropin in turn stimulates the release of the thyroid hormones. A negative feedback loop exists whereby low levels of T4 stimulate the release of TRH (1).

It has been established that in humans TRH is also capable of stimulating the release of prolactin (2). In hypothyroid patients there is often an elevation of TRH and prolactin due to diminished levels of T4. (3) Galactorrhea often presents as a symptom of hypothyroidism.

In sheep, administration of trenbolone acetate results in 45% decrease in thyroxine levels (4). This should exert a stimulatory effect on TRH. ( Interestingly, the same study shows that unlike in humans prolactin levels in the sheep remained unchanged. This is due to the fact that in sheep, unlike in humans, TRH and prolactin are secreted independently of each other (5).)

If it assumed that trenbolone acetate also lowers thyroxine levels in humans, the resulting rise in TRH would stimulate prolactin release, leading to galactorrhea and gynecomastia.

Due to the lack of human studies involving tren, we are all forced to speculate, and try to extrapolate from animal studies.



(1)Endocrinology 1999 Jan;140(1):43-9

Feedback regulation of thyrotropin-releasing hormone gene expression by thyroid hormone in the caudal raphe nuclei in rats.

Yang H, Yuan P, Wu V, Tache Y.
Digestive Diseases Research Center, West Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Department of Medicine and Brain Research Institute, UCLA, California 90073, USA. [email protected]

(2)Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 8th ed. pp.1345-1346

(3) : Endocr J 1997 Feb;44(1):89-94

Incidence of hyperprolactinemia in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis.
Notsu K, Ito Y, Furuya H, Ohguni S, Kato Y.
Department of Medicine, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, Izumo, Japan.

(4)Res Vet Sci 1981 Jan;30(1):7-13

Growth hormone, insulin, prolactin and total thyroxine in the plasma of sheep implanted with the anabolic steroid trenbolone acetate alone or with oestradiol.

Donaldson IA, Hart IC, Heitzman RJ.

(5) Endocrinol 1988 Apr;117(1):115-22

Release of prolactin is independent of the secretion of thyrotrophin-releasing hormone into hypophysial portal blood of sheep.

Thomas GB, Cummins JT, Yao B, Gordon K, Clarke IJ.
Medical Research Centre, Prince Henry's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Yes, finally!!! you hit the nail right on the head.

Fina is a VERY POWERFUL anti-glucocorticoid, so what
exactly does it do to reduce endogeneous cortisone
levels?

There is only ONE mechanism:

A reduction in the TOTAL Free T4 and T3 levels within the
body.

T3 is HIGHLY catabolic to muscle, therefore by reducing it by(
take 45% as shown by Nandi as an example), you are
exerting a ridiculously high protein-sparing effect.

YES, thats right, Fina is not THAT anabolic IN VIVO, it is
far, and I do mean FAR more of an ANTI-CATABOLIC
AAS than anything else.

Ok, now lets back-track to the problem at hand.

TSH has been reduced by the trenbolone, which in
turns signals the thyroid to reduce endogeneously
produced levels of T3 and T4.

This reduction(As Nandi mentioned) causes a VERY
sharp drop in free T3 levels because of the reduction
in both the endogeneously produced T4 and T3.
(Remember that 80% of the free T3 is produced from
the metabolically inactive T4)

These dimished levels of T3,T4 cause Thyrotropin Releasing
Hormone(TRH) to become OVER-STIMULATED.

In essence, this is your bodies feed-back loop to reduced
thyroid hormones, due to a GLUCO-CORTICOID suppresive
effect. This is however NOT like hypothyroidic patients
who have a naturally defective(or damaged) thyroid.

When TRH becomes over-stimulated the net effect is
a VERY sharp increase in prolactin levels.

Critical here.....

I.E. YOU BEGIN TO LACTATE!!!!!

Now, herein lies the problem. Everybody is bio-chemically
different, therefore the TRH increase is EXTREMELY
broad-spectrum.

While someone will stimulate TRH say X% and ultimately
cause a rise in prolactin of say Y% with a daily
dosage of 50mg ED of Fina, another person will
cause a 2X% rise in TRH and 2Y+% rise in prolactin
which will invariably lead to gyno.

This is just genetics. Nothing can be done about this.

However, there are ways to combat prolactin-elevations:

This btw, HAS TO BE EXACT. If you over-dose you cause
a progestenic shift due to severely inhibited prolactin levels,
or if you under-dose you run the risk of getting prolactin
induced gyno.

As a note: PROGESTERONE does NOT, I repeat NOT come into
play with Fina at all. It only becomes into play when you're
trying to inhibit prolactin synthetically.

The only thing that can combat Fina-induced Gyno is:

1. 2.5mgs Bromocriptine broken down to 1.25mgs 2X/day
AM and PM.

Thats it.

No Vitex/Nolva/Clomid/Arimidex or whatever. They don't
work for Fina.

Fonz
 
Blaster220, I agree that the tone of my response was offensive and I am sorry for coming across that way. You were right in taking me to task for this. Like you, I am here to learn.
 
Fonz, you are right in pointing out the importance of proper bromocriptine dosing. Bromocriptine has been shown in numerous studies to elevate GH levels in normal humans. (Paradoxically, it reduces GH levels and is a standard treatment in patients suffering from acromegaly.)

While this may sound like a good thing, it is not if you are trying to clear up gyno. The GH receptor is structurally very similar to the prolactin receptor, and GH acts as an agonist at that receptor. Excess GH will only aggravate the gyno. (1)

(1) J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1998 May;53(3):M183-7

Side effects resulting from the use of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I as combined therapy to frail elderly patients.

Sullivan DH, Carter WJ, Warr WR, Williams LH.

Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, John L. McClellan Memorial Veterans Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between serum IGF-I concentration and the incidence
of side effects of therapy with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) and recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I (rhIGF-I). METHODS: Thirteen high-risk, undernourished elderly males were started on a 15-day course of rhGH and rhIGF-I by subcutaneous injection. The dose of rhGH was held constant at .0125 mg/kg/day, whereas the dose of rhIGF-I was increased in a stepwise fashion from 10 micrograms/kg to the targeted dose of 40 micrograms/kg twice a day. RESULTS: Nine subjects completed the protocol and reached the full target dose of both hormones. .Fluid retention, gynecomastia, and orthostatic hypotension were the most common complications. The hormone injections increased the serum concentration of IGF-I (from 72.7 +/- 40.9 to 483.7 +/- 251.4 eta g/ml, p = .001) and IGFBP-3 (from 1.82 +/- 0.66 to 2.72 +/- 1.18 mg/L, p = .012), and decreased serum albumin (from 34.3 +/- 5.5 to 31.4 +/- 4.6 g/L, p = .009). The magnitude of the initial increase in the serum IGF-I concentration was a powerful risk factor for severe orthostatic hypotension, diffuse myalgias, and drug-induced hepatitis. There was no association between the serum IGF-I concentration and fluid retention or gynecomastia.CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of the undernourished frail elderly with the anabolic agents rhGH and rhIGF-I at the specified dosages may produce undesirable side effects including fluid retention, gynecomastia, and orthostatic hypotension.
 
Fonz - as an experiment, I'm going to drop my Vitex and Nolvadex today and see how my body reacts.

Background - 75 mg Fina ED for 5 days gave me puffy sore nips (only other med was Proviron 50 mg ED). Stopped Fina, started Vitex and Nolvadex immediately. Nips back to normal in a couple of days.

Current dose - I restarted at 37.5 mg EOD for 6 days. Also using Vitex @ 1500 mg ED and Nolvadex @ 30 mg ED. After 6 days of no problems, upped the dose to 37.5 mg ED. Been on that for a week with no problems.

I'm going to drop the Vitex and Nolva and keep Fina at 37.5 mg ED (as well as Proviron 50 mg ED). But as soon as I can get some Bromo I'll up the dose back to 75 mg ED. I'll try to keep everyone informed of my progress.
 
Prolactin suppresses GnRH, causing a decrease in luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone, ultimately leading to decreased serum testosterone levels and hypogonadism. Prolactinoma in men also may cause neurological symptoms, particularly visual-field defects. Given this information it can be clearly said that Gyno can be caused by an increase in estrogen in response to a decrease in serum testosterone levels & FSH.

I think this is as clear as it gets. We know that Tren increases prolactin yet prolactin by its self will not cause Gyno. The reason why vitex appears to work so well with some people it that it hits both ends of the loop. Reduces prolactin & increases progesterone thereby creating an inhibitory effect on serum estrogen.

I’m going to do an experiment to gage the effectiveness of vitex on persistent gyno caused by Tren (My own).
I have ordered Vitex and will take 1500 mg ED. If Vitex is effective than I should see some resolution. If my mass does not shrink than I will try Bromocriptine which I have also ordered. If the tissue growth is in fact being influenced by this feedback loop than I should see some resolution with either or. If the vitex does not work and the Bromo does, than it will be safe to say the Vitex is effective in inhibiting estrogen through elevations in progesterone, where people have reported improvement through its use. If the Vitex works than it will be safe to say that it does in fact lower prolactin.

Hope that makes sense. I will keep the results posted.
 
Top Bottom