Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor Labs

Flight attendant charged with drugging child's drink during flight.

big4life

Plat Hero
Platinum
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Midwest/03/14/spiked.juice.ap/index.html


DETROIT, Michigan (AP) -- Authorities charged a former Northwest Airlines flight attendant with assault for allegedly putting a prescription depressant in 19-month-old girl's apple juice to stop her crying during an international flight.

Daniel Reed Cunningham, 33, also was charged Thursday with distributing a controlled substance on the August 25 flight from Amsterdam to Detroit.

He is expected to appear in court next week for his arraignment.

The girl's mother, Beate Turner, told FBI special agent Terry Booth that Cunningham seemed upset when her daughter became restless and began squirming and crying on the flight. Cunningham offered to give the girl apple juice three times before Turner accepted, according to the agent's affidavit. The girl suffered no serious injury.

Turner later noticed the juice was bitter and foamy and had blue and white specks floating in it. Ten days after the flight, she took the juice to University Laboratories in Novi, which confirmed the presence of Xanax, a prescription medication used to treat panic attacks and anxiety, the FBI said.

The drug's side effects include lightheadedness, fatigue and drowsiness. The Federal Drug Administration hasn't approved it for children under age 18, the agency said.

Cunningham has denied drugging the child in statements to the FBI. His attorney, Neil Fink, declined comment.

Cunningham also has been charged with importing more than 100 tablets of a non-narcotic controlled substance into the United States on a different flight in October. The tablets included Xanax and Valium.

Northwest spokeswoman Mary Stanik said Cunningham was hired in 1998 and worked for the airline until last December 30. She said she could not discuss his case.
 
Have you ever been on a flight in the screaming baby section? I have and it sucks.

This was an international flight as well. Jesus that had to suck.

Just imagine if KAYNE was on the FLIGHT!!!

He would have killed everyone and ate the baby bit by bit!
 
spongebob said:
i would have check the kid in with my baggage.

LOL

I think the attendant went the wrong way about this.

He should have dosed everyone on the plane. After all, he had enough tabs for everyone...!

(edited for content)
 
Last edited:
The attendant should be rewarded. I've been on long international flights and a friggin baby screaming it's ass off for hours is no fun. It will make everyones blood boil. Some parents have an attitude of "oh well, the kids crying what do you expect me to do".
 
XBiker said:


LOL

I think the attendant went the wrong way about this.

She should have dosed everyone on the plane. After all, she had enough tabs for everyone...!

exactly, i would have had both my hands out for some xanax!:p
 
XBiker said:
Have you ever been on a flight in the screaming baby section? I have and it sucks.

This was an international flight as well. Jesus that had to suck.

Just imagine if KAYNE was on the FLIGHT!!!

He would have killed everyone and ate the baby bit by bit!


I'D PUT THE PARENTS IN THE CARGO AREA RESULTING IN THEM FREEZING TO DEATH AND LOCK THE KID IN THE JOHN TILL WE LANDED!!!

THIS ISNT ROCKET SCIENCE.....IF A BABY IS CRYING, REMOVE BABY FROM SCENE. ESPECIALLY IN FUCKING MOVIE THEATERS!!! FUCK, DONT EVEN BRING THEM IN THE DAMN THEATER!!!



KAYNE
 
KAYNE said:



I'D PUT THE PARENTS IN THE CARGO AREA RESULTING IN THEM FREEZING TO DEATH AND LOCK THE KID IN THE JOHN TILL WE LANDED!!!

THIS ISNT ROCKET SCIENCE.....IF A BABY IS CRYING, REMOVE BABY FROM SCENE. ESPECIALLY IN FUCKING MOVIE THEATERS!!! FUCK, DONT EVEN BRING THEM IN THE DAMN THEATER!!!



KAYNE

The Theather shit boils my blood all the time. I mean WTF is that all about. I go to see a R rated movie and there are kids crying, WTF is that all about? Who lets these people enter the theather?
 
Hmmm....

Fire her? Maybe.

I think there should be a drug you can safely slip into a kids drink to put them out when they won't behave.

Heaven knows I don't want to listen to a crying kid for a whole flight. :rolleyes:
 
Y'all are some heartless people. It was just a baby. Yes, it's annoying but damn............
 
The parents should have been beaten and the baby should have been giving something to shut it up, like a pacify, bottle of milk, etc. It seems, particulary in the U.S., that parents are starting to let their children dictate the actions of the parents. Far too often, I see parents negotiating, asking and conversing with their children in such a manner as if to say that the children hold some actual authority or power that makes them equal to their parents. If you are 10 years old, and your parents tell you to clean your room, do your homework or that you can't get candy when at the supermarket checkout line, THAT'S IT! END OF DISCUSSION! Shit, I remember a while back I saw a mother ASKING AND PLEADING with her child to stop yelling and screaming because he couldn't get candy when they were going through the candy/snack aisle. If I were the parent, I would have told the kid, "Son, it would be difficult for you to eat candy if I knock out all of your teeth."
 
BronzedGoddess said:
Y'all are some heartless people. It was just a baby. Yes, it's annoying but damn............

it becomes more than an annoyance when you are on an intercontinental flight, and you have to listen to a screaming brat the whole ride there.

drugging is a very viable and good option to take care of these children....especially since their own parents cant control them.
 
gwl9dta4 said:
The attendant should be rewarded. I've been on long international flights and a friggin baby screaming it's ass off for hours is no fun. It will make everyones blood boil. Some parents have an attitude of "oh well, the kids crying what do you expect me to do".

This is true..and if I were the attendant, impulsivity and impatience would tell me to do the same thing as this attendant did. However, there are many things that I want to do in life, but logic, reasoning, and awareness of consequences keep me in check. Xanax is a prescription drug and it is not particularily intended for use by small children. I mean, the child could have had a terrible reaction to the drug. Who is to be the judge as to the portion of the xanax to give to the child? The flight attendant was out of line and took too big of a risk, in my opinion, to keep a crying baby quiet for a few hours.
 
HULKSTER said:
The parents should have been beaten and the baby should have been giving something to shut it up, like a pacify, bottle of milk, etc. It seems, particulary in the U.S., that parents are starting to let their children dictate the actions of the parents. Far too often, I see parents negotiating, asking and conversing with their children in such a manner as if to say that the children hold some actual authority or power that makes them equal to their parents. If you are 10 years old, and your parents tell you to clean your room, do your homework or that you can't get candy when at the supermarket checkout line, THAT'S IT! END OF DISCUSSION! Shit, I remember a while back I saw a mother ASKING AND PLEADING with her child to stop yelling and screaming because he couldn't get candy when they were going through the candy/snack aisle. If I were the parent, I would have told the kid, "Son, it would be difficult for you to eat candy if I knock out all of your teeth."


LOL! True dat.:D
 
p0ink said:


it becomes more than an annoyance when you are on an intercontinental flight, and you have to listen to a screaming brat the whole ride there.

drugging is a very viable and good option to take care of these children....especially since their own parents cant control them.

True and I do agree that it is an annoyance. However, this is drugging without the consent of the parents; that is the issue at hand. No one is denying that crying children on both airline flights and in movie theaters is annoying.
Drugging is a viable option...with parental consent. How would you feel if someone drugged your child without your permission, or even telling you about it? I know that I would be pretty pissed off.
 
bunnymt said:


True and I do agree that it is an annoyance. However, this is drugging without the consent of the parents; that is the issue at hand. No one is denying that crying children on both airline flights and in movie theaters is annoying.
Drugging is a viable option...with parental consent. How would you feel if someone drugged your child without your permission, or even telling you about it? I know that I would be pretty pissed off.


Well if they asked the answer would be a clear no. And besides any stupid parent that acts like a stupid cow and just sits there while their child screams thinking "it will cry itself out" deserves to have their children drugged and having their asses kicked by all the passangers as they exit the plane.
 
bunnymt said:


True and I do agree that it is an annoyance. However, this is drugging without the consent of the parents; that is the issue at hand. No one is denying that crying children on both airline flights and in movie theaters is annoying.
Drugging is a viable option...with parental consent. How would you feel if someone drugged your child without your permission, or even telling you about it? I know that I would be pretty pissed off.

what if the parents say no? should all of the passengers be forced to hear this brat scream non-stop? people pay several hundred dollars for a flight, and they should not have to be subjected to some bratty kid screaming non-stop for several hours.
 
gwl9dta4 said:



Well if they asked the answer would be a clear no. And besides any stupid parent that acts like a stupid cow and just sits there while their child screams thinking "it will cry itself out" deserves to have their children drugged and having their asses kicked by all the passangers as they exit the plane.

True. But what right does the attendant have to take a child's future into his own hands to administer this prescription drug?
 
p0ink said:


what if the parents say no? should all of the passengers be forced to hear this brat scream non-stop? people pay several hundred dollars for a flight, and they should not have to be subjected to some bratty kid screaming non-stop for several hours.

Yes. I agree. I have been on these international flights in the past. When a child starts to bawl, I am probably the first person to get annoyed and to feel hot blood rush to my face. This is especially when I am trying to relax on a flight, or enjoy a movie in the movie theater. However, Xanax is no joke. The flight attendant took too much authority into his own hands. There are other viable options to keeping a brat quiet, besides doping it up with prescription drugs against parental consent.
 
bunnymt said:


Are you 100 percent sure that this is the stance you would take if your own child was the one being drugged without your consent?

if my child was a fucking brat, i would have packed a bag full of benzodiazepines and barbituates.
 
p0ink said:


if my child was a fucking brat, i would have packed a bag full of benzodiazepines and barbituates.

LOL....I agree. I was just thinking that I would have a bottle with some "spiked" milk. MILK + SWEET BRANDY= SLEEPING BABY.
But I would do this for my own children only...I would not want some schmuck drugging my child.
 
Top Bottom