tridentstar
New member
Mr. X, and others; I just read a thread where a college kid wants to look more like a mens health fitness model. I used to want to get huge and be musclebound and all that, but getting to 222 pounds with 14% bf was really uncomfortable. Although this isnt really big, or even remotely big i still didnt like it.
I have set some goals for myself in that i want to be in the area of 190 to 195 with 8 or 9 percent bodyfat.
As of two weeks ago i weighed in at 200 pounds with 12%bf. Now this means that over the course of one year i have lost 14 pounds of muscle and 7 or so pounds of fat.
To reach my goals, all i need to do right now is lose 7 to 10 pounds of bodyfat and gain very little muscle.
Right now i am doing a ckd and in a week and a half i have made visible progress.
The whole idea behind this whole mess above is the fact that Mr. X recommended a balanced diet for him.
Now my question.......... would it be just as easy and FAST to reach my goals if i were to follow a 40-30-30 diet or even a 33-33-33 diet as it would to ckd for 6 weeks and bulk for 6 weeks then ckd again.
THIS ALL SUCKS BECAUSE THERE ARE SO MANY DIFFERENT OPTIONS.....ARGGGGHHHHHH.
I have set some goals for myself in that i want to be in the area of 190 to 195 with 8 or 9 percent bodyfat.
As of two weeks ago i weighed in at 200 pounds with 12%bf. Now this means that over the course of one year i have lost 14 pounds of muscle and 7 or so pounds of fat.
To reach my goals, all i need to do right now is lose 7 to 10 pounds of bodyfat and gain very little muscle.
Right now i am doing a ckd and in a week and a half i have made visible progress.
The whole idea behind this whole mess above is the fact that Mr. X recommended a balanced diet for him.
Now my question.......... would it be just as easy and FAST to reach my goals if i were to follow a 40-30-30 diet or even a 33-33-33 diet as it would to ckd for 6 weeks and bulk for 6 weeks then ckd again.
THIS ALL SUCKS BECAUSE THERE ARE SO MANY DIFFERENT OPTIONS.....ARGGGGHHHHHH.