No I am NOT one of these guys who has no clue about math, or how cc's relate to mgs. etc. LOL
I have a question about the math used in the various Fina conversion kits.
Something is WRONG out there.
For example looking at the sites of some of the major kit suppliers (ancillaryguys, f_kits, f_farm, Mr T, etc) there seems to be some problems with the Math they use.
Check this, one of them has the following on their site:
Huh? - Read that closely. Those numbers do NOT correlate to each other!
If a 4G kit makes 50 cc, then if everything is the same, we would assume that an 8G kit would make 100 cc (everything would have doubled, assuming that the resultant concentration of all is the same).
Now the figures correlate for the 6, 8 and 10 g kits (they are all proportional to each other) but the 4g is wierd.
And these same calculations are on several F_kit sites.
Any ideas whats up?
The ONLY way this would make sesne would be if there was a dramatic difference in the conversion efficiency of the 4 g kit, and ALL of the others. The 4 g kits (assuming that it makes 50 cc of 75 mg/ml) is converting at an efficiency of 93.75%, whereas all of the rest are converting at 75% efficiency.
Can anyone make sense of this? (I have a feeling that I have lost 90% of the readers long ago ... LOL.)
Dave
I have a question about the math used in the various Fina conversion kits.
Something is WRONG out there.
For example looking at the sites of some of the major kit suppliers (ancillaryguys, f_kits, f_farm, Mr T, etc) there seems to be some problems with the Math they use.
Check this, one of them has the following on their site:
Our Kits Produce A True End Product Of:
4g Kit=50cc
6g Kit=60cc
8g Kit=80cc
10g Kit=100cc
4g Kit=50cc
6g Kit=60cc
8g Kit=80cc
10g Kit=100cc
Huh? - Read that closely. Those numbers do NOT correlate to each other!
If a 4G kit makes 50 cc, then if everything is the same, we would assume that an 8G kit would make 100 cc (everything would have doubled, assuming that the resultant concentration of all is the same).
Now the figures correlate for the 6, 8 and 10 g kits (they are all proportional to each other) but the 4g is wierd.
And these same calculations are on several F_kit sites.
Any ideas whats up?
The ONLY way this would make sesne would be if there was a dramatic difference in the conversion efficiency of the 4 g kit, and ALL of the others. The 4 g kits (assuming that it makes 50 cc of 75 mg/ml) is converting at an efficiency of 93.75%, whereas all of the rest are converting at 75% efficiency.
Can anyone make sense of this? (I have a feeling that I have lost 90% of the readers long ago ... LOL.)
Dave

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










