Feel free to lol at my misfortune

[Smurfy]

I noticed you didn't capitalize the F in the original post, are you still right?

no Im completely wrong in every way possible

 

[Stefka]

I'm not a lawyer so I have no idea if there's something on the books about such deceptive practices and the resultant liability. The problem I see is, it's all hearsay...Puddles claims she said *this (lies about birth control)*...fact is, he admitted he didn't use a condom so he never took reasonable precaution (and believing what a f*ck-buddy *tells* you is not reasonable precaution). Puddles knows, even with proper precaution, that there is ALWAYS a chance of pregnancy (and at that point, the odds of it happening or not, isn't even relevent), so I cannot fathom how anyone can claim they'd not understand the consequences of sex, protected or not.

And I'm not making excuses for her behaviour, it's a crappy situation...and I speak as a former kid from a legal union who's parent abandoned the family for the simple reason that she, and her sisters, weren't the boys he wanted.


edit: I will admit that from the sounds of it (her having another child and being in her very early 20's) that she is exploiting Puddles economic situation for her benefit.

Not hearsay - party admission exception - it is up to the jury to weigh the conflicting stories and judge the credibility of Puds and Psycholady.
(Not that this kind of thing would ever go to trial, I just wanted to use some of the crap I learned in evidence)

 

[BlueBird]

Not hearsay - party admission exception - it is up to the jury to weigh the conflicting stories and judge the credibility of Puds and Psycholady.
(Not that this kind of thing would ever go to trial, I just wanted to use some of the crap I learned in evidence)

Thanks Stefka. I really don't have the proper knowledge or appreciation of legal terminology....probably shouldn't have referenced any.

 

[puddlemonkey]

Not hearsay - party admission exception - it is up to the jury to weigh the conflicting stories and judge the credibility of Puds and Psycholady.
(Not that this kind of thing would ever go to trial, I just wanted to use some of the crap I learned in evidence)

I have a bunch of incriminating messages from her, I'll be saving those.

 

[puddlemonkey]

Yes, it is kind of funny that this was his biggest fear and he kept talking about how much he didn’t trust her and then he didn’t feel the nuvaring anymore but for some reason he decided to believe her when she said she was on birth control.

By the time I asked about why I haven't felt it in a couple weeks it was too late, she was already prego at that time. I didn't always question it when it wasn't felt because with nuvaring you do go 1 out of 4 weeks without it in.

 

[puddlemonkey]

You're having a stern talking to with your penis?

He's not much of a talker, he's more of a doer.

 

[Smurfy]

He's not much of a talker, he's more of a doer.

Pics

 

[puddlemonkey]

Pics

I have some!


Unfortunately its of him inside of her.

 

[blueta2]

I agree with everything you said.

Wow Blue that's some heavy stuff there

yeah but you disagree with what I say

 

[blueta2]

I'm not a lawyer so I have no idea if there's something on the books about such deceptive practices and the resultant liability. The problem I see is, it's all hearsay...Puddles claims she said *this (lies about birth control)*...fact is, he admitted he didn't use a condom so he never took reasonable precaution (and believing what a f*ck-buddy *tells* you is not reasonable precaution). Puddles knows, even with proper precaution, that there is ALWAYS a chance of pregnancy (and at that point, the odds of it happening or not, isn't even relevent), so I cannot fathom how anyone can claim they'd not understand the consequences of sex, protected or not.

And I'm not making excuses for her behaviour, it's a crappy situation...and I speak as a former kid from a legal union who's parent abandoned the family for the simple reason that she, and her sisters, weren't the boys he wanted.


edit: I will admit that from the sounds of it (her having another child and being in her very early 20's) that she is exploiting Puddles economic situation for her benefit.

A rational woman in this thread, finally!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!