T-Matt unfortunately you just lost all credibility with respect to financial and capital markets in this post. It is clear you are a man with a desire to succeed and do well, and possibly even help people, but you have not spent much time studying basic finance and return expectations over the long haul, and are unfamiliar with the current state of the capital market fee structures.
REIT funds do not, have not and will never exceed over the long-term the real inflation adjust return of the S&P 500 or the Russell 2000 small cap index. REITs and real estate investments in general will provide a lower return, commensurate with the reduced level of risk inherent to owning commercial income producing property. The standard deviation (volatility, aka "risk" with respect to an investments) of returns of a REIT fund is lower than the S&P because of the consistent earning stream provided by real estate, therefore average long term returns will be slightly lowers, and the volatility of the S&P 500 is lower than that of the Russell 2000 small cap index, as large caps have more consistent earnings than do small caps.
Since the early 1900's the average geometric return of the S&P 500 has been around 12%, and for the Russell 2000 has been about 17%. The Russell, as stated before, of course is more volatile and therefore requires a longer holding period to be certain of that long-term return.
The excessive gains in REITs over the past few years have been a correction, as REITs were severely out of favor during the tech boom of the late 90's when all anyone wanted to buy was technology. The brilliant and legendary real estate mogul Sam Zell said in an interview back in '99 when REITs were yielding over TEN PERCENT "If I would do one thing right now in the market, I'd tell grandma to put it all in REITs". Of course we all know they have subsequently gone on to triple since then. His advice would be much different now. The first thing your teacher, or boss, or whoever should have taught you is that past results are not an indicator of future returns and should not be represented as such.
Whoever has taught you that a 10-15% return in a passive investment vehicle such as a mutual fund etc. is small should re-evaluate how they are training their employees. If you are going around telling people they can expect 30-40% returns investing in anything such as any fund, you are doing them a great disservice.
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway is the stuff of legends, having returned a compounded 21.5% per year since 1965 (see Berkshire Hathaway 2005 annual report, page 2, here:
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/2005arn/2005ar.pdf)
His out performance is due to active buying and selling of undervalued companies, and active investment in the stocks of other companies that are severely undervalued (such as REITs were 4 years ago).
Peter Lynch is another legend, his famed Magellan Fund was up around 20% for over 10 years, an unbelievable feat. These guys are simply incredible.
Bill Miller from Legg Mason has beat the S&P going on about 14 years in a row now, and that alone is a feat in itself. Statistical anomalies.
And wherever you got that number up there that a broker fee to buy into a fund is $8,000 is living in fantasy land. Maybe if you are a total and complete retard who does no research you can find someone who would rip you off so badly, but it would be very difficult. You should find no load or very low load funds (in case people don't know what that is, it's a commission for buying into a fund "front loaded" or for selling your investment in the fund "back loaded") and the annual maintenance fee on the fund should be at a MAXIMUM 1.5%. And for that, the manager better be fucking great. Your chart is waaaaaaaaay off.
Empirical studies have found that statistically, managers on the whole cannot outperform indexes on their own and your best bet is to simply buy various indexes on your own and construct a diversified portfolio from those. One of the 2 biggest investment companies in the world was founded on this principle (Vanguard) by a very very smart man, John Bogle.
Anyone that can return a consistent 15% annual return will have money being thrown at them bro.
T-Matt if you really want to be good in this industry, in estate planning and financial advisory etc. teaching people about finance, if you do not have a degree in finance or do not want to get an MBA, I'd recommend possibly a CFP charter to familiarize and ground you in the basics of personal finance and capital markets. You can do it in about a year and it would help you avoid making statements that anybody with even a cursory knowledge of finance can see are false, misleading and dangerous to the uninformed individual investor. You have great spirit, and I think with time and more knowledge you can reach your goals. Deluding people that huge commission rips will be offset by tax-free gains and that is the way to become rich is not a noble way to do it though.