Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
M
musclebones
Guest
draw 
Any more support for this "ester" dropping theory ?
Any more support for this "ester" dropping theory ?
Experienced users; Do you believe in localized growth from site injections ?
Big Brother Val
New member
On Fina my arms and delts (where I was injecting) saw more significant growth than the rest of my body.
After I was off for almost 3 months, none of that growth was lost.
I am now on Fina/Prop... and again... my arms are seeing a great surge of growth.
I believe they work... however... maybe not with all compounds.
I am not a scientist... but it worked on me... so to me... that's all the "scientific" proof I need.
After I was off for almost 3 months, none of that growth was lost.
I am now on Fina/Prop... and again... my arms are seeing a great surge of growth.
I believe they work... however... maybe not with all compounds.
I am not a scientist... but it worked on me... so to me... that's all the "scientific" proof I need.
M
musclebones
Guest
... heres a "scientific" quote i found posted by HOSS
"Listen...site injections do not work!!! unless you have so much scar tissue in your glutes, quads, and delts that the pin will not penetrate, stick with those sites. The oil or water based compound simply seeps slowly into the bloodstream, no matter where you inject. That is where it works...not at the muscle directly...the blood then uses the extra test or whatever to increase protein synthesis, and increase red blood cell count.
The muscle itself just see's the oil as an obstruction and swells...but only temporaraly. If site injections worked I should have an ass so big I wouldn't need to sit...my ass would be touching the floor while I'm standing. And I shouldn't be able to wear ANY size pants without shredding the pant legs."
hrm ..
i'll just have to experiement more ..
"Listen...site injections do not work!!! unless you have so much scar tissue in your glutes, quads, and delts that the pin will not penetrate, stick with those sites. The oil or water based compound simply seeps slowly into the bloodstream, no matter where you inject. That is where it works...not at the muscle directly...the blood then uses the extra test or whatever to increase protein synthesis, and increase red blood cell count.
The muscle itself just see's the oil as an obstruction and swells...but only temporaraly. If site injections worked I should have an ass so big I wouldn't need to sit...my ass would be touching the floor while I'm standing. And I shouldn't be able to wear ANY size pants without shredding the pant legs."
hrm ..
i'll just have to experiement more ..
It hasn't been scientificly proven that localized growth however in theory it should work for three reasons:
1) It has been proven that the stretch of the fascia in the muscle creates additional space for new muscle to be developed. This is why muscle memory exists , and it is always harder to gain muscle size you have never had compared to gaining muscle size you have had before. The stretch of the fascia takes time and requires hard training to encourage where as if the fascia is already stretched the time required to add muscle in that space is much less.
Based on this the belief is localized injections will cause a stretch of the fascia... which explains why synthol works.
2) Fast acting AS such as prop and winstrol are believed to be acting immediately in the muscle of which it was injected. Because of this behavior the muscle of which you inject in should have an additional benifit of this fast acting steroid.
3) Everyone who has injected locally has confirmed tremendous muscle pumps. It has been proven that the bigger the pump the more blood ( carrying nutrients ) will fill the muscle. Therefore , the belief is that more blood in the muscle leads to faster recovery and eventually more growth. Hence , the bigger pumps help increase the amount of growth for the injected muscle.
Based on this I would say localized growth does exist.
1) It has been proven that the stretch of the fascia in the muscle creates additional space for new muscle to be developed. This is why muscle memory exists , and it is always harder to gain muscle size you have never had compared to gaining muscle size you have had before. The stretch of the fascia takes time and requires hard training to encourage where as if the fascia is already stretched the time required to add muscle in that space is much less.
Based on this the belief is localized injections will cause a stretch of the fascia... which explains why synthol works.
2) Fast acting AS such as prop and winstrol are believed to be acting immediately in the muscle of which it was injected. Because of this behavior the muscle of which you inject in should have an additional benifit of this fast acting steroid.
3) Everyone who has injected locally has confirmed tremendous muscle pumps. It has been proven that the bigger the pump the more blood ( carrying nutrients ) will fill the muscle. Therefore , the belief is that more blood in the muscle leads to faster recovery and eventually more growth. Hence , the bigger pumps help increase the amount of growth for the injected muscle.
Based on this I would say localized growth does exist.
T
The Shadow
Guest
UNKNOWN SOLDIER said:
Very closed minded statement. Do you not think Synthol works??
NPCMONSTER
New member
site injections do work. i have had alot of experience with them. the trick is consistancy. repetative shots work. the trick is to use a chemical that has a high affinity for the receptor or a longer lasting ester like deca or test enanthate. people who claim great results from prop or winstrol or susp. are just experiencing temporary inflamation anything that stays is SCAR tissue. not that that ios a bad thing SCAR TISSUE can look great. or it can look like greg valentino.
Similar threads
