Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Eth, Prop, or Sust

Eth, Prop or Sust.

  • Test E

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • Test Prop

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • Sustanon

    Votes: 8 66.7%

  • Total voters
    12
  • Poll closed .
These polls have been done to death. This which test is best myth needs to stop. This is one of those self-perpetuating internet myths.

Test is test boys. The ester does NOT affect it's actions or how it works, only how quickly it's absorbed by the body.

Having said that, I think the longer acting esters make it easier to maintain a more stable blood level.

Does anyone remember Aratest? I used to love that stuff. Enanth with a little prop kicker. Came on hard and love me long time.
 
mattdan said:
These polls have been done to death. This which test is best myth needs to stop. This is one of those self-perpetuating internet myths.

Test is test boys. The ester does NOT affect it's actions or how it works, only how quickly it's absorbed by the body.

Having said that, I think the longer acting esters make it easier to maintain a more stable blood level.

Does anyone remember Aratest? I used to love that stuff. testosterone enanthate with a little testosterone propionate kicker. Came on hard and love me long time.
wrong
 
I'll add that I honestly think I've done about every type of test out there, and I don't personally see any SIGNIFICANT difference, other than the obvious of time to take action and how long it works.

I think MOST, but surely not all of the vets would agree with me that for the most part, test is test.
 
mattdan said:
I'll add that I honestly think I've done about every type of test out there, and I don't personally see any SIGNIFICANT difference, other than the obvious of time to take action and how long it works.

I think MOST, but surely not all of the vets would agree with me that for the most part, test is test.
yes test is test bro.but the deferent esters do a lot of deferent things across I wide range of things in the body.I am so tired I have worked so many dame hours this week I dont even feel like getting deep into any thing right now but I will come back to this thread some other time....they can also work in deferent was in deferent cycles like test prop is good used in a cutting cycle like test prop/tren/winny but thats another long topic I dont feel like getting into so for right now I guess will just let you be right...test is test when you look at it in lamen terms.
 
Here's what I'm getting at. Once the body's esterace removes the ester you are left with test. Longer acting esters are simply longer chains that take the body longer to remove. That's why longer acting esters have a lower actual test doseage, because the ester takes up more weight.

Once the body removes the ester, you have test - period.

Yes, I know there can be minor differences and I'm not sure what causes them. But this is why I said no SIGNIFICANT differences.

Minor differences, yes. Significant differences, I have yet to see a chemical explanation for significant differences between test esters. My personal experience has been pretty much the same.

And remember - I did my first cycle back in 1985, so it ain't my first rodeo.

The only test I can truly say I felt different on was Sten. I was never sure why but I figured it was either the very thin oil used, or the DHEA added to it. I think it was the DHEA.

So if I were to really say which test is best, I'd have to vote for Sten - but no one ever has that in a poll. The only downside to the Sten was it is a fairly low dose per mg test, so you had to inject more.

On a side note, if you don't believe in DHEA, you've probably never used it. It actually works halfway decent as part of a H RT.

Has anyone else here used Sten?
 
Top Bottom