Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
EF 's most right wing member
- Thread starter rjl296
- Start date
atlantabiolab
New member
rjl296 said:
Right wing, used synonomously with Republicanism, is not what I consider myself. I do not hold to the Republican Party platform, nor support their current actions. Libertarianism holds more value to me that any of the other parties in the US.
ttlpkg more closely resembles what is commonly considered right wing on this board, in my opinion.
pitbullstl
New member
rjl296 said:
Who's the broad in your avafantabolous
Stangfriik
New member
Re: Re: EF 's most right wing member
hmm maybe someone should bring back that website where he got that from. Tons and Tons of hotties
pitbullstl said:
hmm maybe someone should bring back that website where he got that from. Tons and Tons of hotties
Robert Jan
New member
All these people i dont agree with
A
anabolicmd
Guest
Hengst.
A
Apöllo
Guest
I surprised no one has mentioned testosteroneboy
A
anabolicmd
Guest
Apöllo said:
Hes not a member.
rjl296
New member
Re: Re: Re: EF 's most right wing member
http://pittance.nodalpoint.net/doc/bonnasses/
Stangfriik said:
http://pittance.nodalpoint.net/doc/bonnasses/
atlantabiolab
New member
ChefWide said:
Nice try, Trotsky
C
Code
Guest
Code == Right Wing
Code == Chicken Wings
Code == Buffalo Wings
Code == Chicken Wings
Code == Buffalo Wings
Deus Ex Machina
New member
C
Code
Guest
Better than being the fat slob who lives with his mom and can't get laid with 500 bucks and pocket pussy.
nordstrom said:
Lao Tzu
New member
Code said:
LOL. sayeth the bitter troll who will have to watch his daughter grow up to be a chubby britney spears wannabe.
That was a pretty good insult though.
And im dieting now, ill have you know my bodyfat percentage now is in the 'overweight' category. no more being obese for me.
C
Code
Guest
Hey at least your only in the 'still can't get laid' category.
Someday my padawan pimp. Someday.
Someday my padawan pimp. Someday.
nordstrom said:
PIGEON-RAT
New member
Re: Re: EF 's most right wing member
don't libertarians oppose government intervention in social affairs? wouldn't that conflict with your pro-life stance?
atlantabiolab said:
don't libertarians oppose government intervention in social affairs? wouldn't that conflict with your pro-life stance?
PIGEON-RAT
New member
Re: Re: Re: Re: EF 's most right wing member
jailbait galore
rjl296 said:
jailbait galore
atlantabiolab
New member
Re: Re: Re: EF 's most right wing member
No. Government's rightful authority is to intervene in situations where the rights of one are infringed upon by another, such as murder, theft, rape, etc. Since I understand the fetus to be a unique individual, I consider it imparted with certain rights of nature, thus demanding of protection.
The Libertarian approach to sex, marriage, drug use, etc. all hinge upon the basic idea that these actions harm no one, thus require no interference from government.
PIGEON-RAT said:
No. Government's rightful authority is to intervene in situations where the rights of one are infringed upon by another, such as murder, theft, rape, etc. Since I understand the fetus to be a unique individual, I consider it imparted with certain rights of nature, thus demanding of protection.
The Libertarian approach to sex, marriage, drug use, etc. all hinge upon the basic idea that these actions harm no one, thus require no interference from government.
Re: Re: Re: Re: EF 's most right wing member
The belief that drug use harms no one seems to ignore the fact that a very high % of those arrested for violent crimes have a history of drug & alcohol use/abuse and it's often present in their system while the crimes are committed.
No doubt you've heard this before and will respond appropriately.
(I vote for curling or ttlpkg)
atlantabiolab said:
The belief that drug use harms no one seems to ignore the fact that a very high % of those arrested for violent crimes have a history of drug & alcohol use/abuse and it's often present in their system while the crimes are committed.
No doubt you've heard this before and will respond appropriately.
(I vote for curling or ttlpkg)
atlantabiolab
New member
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: EF 's most right wing member
Yes, this correlation is high, but to lay causation on the drug ignores the fact that many times more people use drugs with never commiting any crime. Not to mention, other factors could be just as easily correlated to criminality, such as race, gender, family structure, etc. We don't want a "War on Black Urban Males" do we?
But the main idea is that government's coercive role was meant to be used in actual violations of rights, i.e. the crime, and not for every potential assumption.
Dial_tone said:
The belief that drug use harms no one seems to ignore the fact that a very high % of those arrested for violent crimes have a history of drug & alcohol use/abuse and it's often present in their system while the crimes are committed.
No doubt you've heard this before and will respond appropriately.
(I vote for curling or ttlpkg)
Yes, this correlation is high, but to lay causation on the drug ignores the fact that many times more people use drugs with never commiting any crime. Not to mention, other factors could be just as easily correlated to criminality, such as race, gender, family structure, etc. We don't want a "War on Black Urban Males" do we?
But the main idea is that government's coercive role was meant to be used in actual violations of rights, i.e. the crime, and not for every potential assumption.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: EF 's most right wing member
We pretty much have one already, albeit largely justified. Besides, I live in the suburbs anyway.
Damn, I just realized this is the racial breakdown of my area:
Races in Rancho Palos Verdes:
* White Non-Hispanic (63.1%)
* Chinese (8.5%)
* Japanese (7.9%)
* Hispanic (5.7%)
* Korean (5.0%)
* Two or more races (3.4%)
* Black (2.0%)
* Asian Indian (1.6%)
* Filipino (1.5%)
* Other race (1.2%)
* Other Asian (1.2%)
* American Indian (0.6%)
atlantabiolab said:
We pretty much have one already, albeit largely justified. Besides, I live in the suburbs anyway.
Damn, I just realized this is the racial breakdown of my area:
Races in Rancho Palos Verdes:
* White Non-Hispanic (63.1%)
* Chinese (8.5%)
* Japanese (7.9%)
* Hispanic (5.7%)
* Korean (5.0%)
* Two or more races (3.4%)
* Black (2.0%)
* Asian Indian (1.6%)
* Filipino (1.5%)
* Other race (1.2%)
* Other Asian (1.2%)
* American Indian (0.6%)
Similar threads
