Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Economic Derpression of 2001

I also heard another theory about what someone has done effects what will happen later. (I forget the latin for it)...Anywho, they were attempting to say that the poor economy in Carters days were not his fault, but the great economy in Reagans was Carter's doing.

That $300 was nothing more than an advance on next years return anyway.
 
I don't follow politics but that was a pretty ignorant post Ryan. who is president and what party they are affiliated with has very little to nothing to do with the economic trend. had gore been elected, the economy still would have gone down.

in regards to getting guns and stocking up on canned goods...i give that a big LOL
the same shit was said about Y2K. this time it is even less likely that we would ever get to that point. i would love to know who these "experts" are...probably a bunch of conspiracy theorists.
 
RyanH said:
1998-1992: GEORGE BUSH SERVED AS PRESIDENT----economy hits recession.

1992-2000: WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON SERVED AS PRESIDENT------economy flourishes.

2001------: GEORGE BUSH SERVES AS PRESIDENT----economy begins to slide towards recession.

ANYONE SEE A PATTERN HERE? Hold onto those 300.00 refunds, you might need it!!!!!

Damnit!!!! RyanH you are pissing me off here...again!!!!!! You and I are not suppossed to agree on things.....
 
In the UK a similar story is told. We used to have a Conservative government (remember John Major?). The country was really run down during the conservative years. When Labour got into power they inherited a run down country which had to have money spent on it.
The result being that Tony Blairs government could have ended up looking very bad.

The country does seem to have improved alot since Labour got into power though......people who hadnt worked for years now do for instance.

FrankRizzo said:
I also heard another theory about what someone has done effects what will happen later. (I forget the latin for it)...Anywho, they were attempting to say that the poor economy in Carters days were not his fault, but the great economy in Reagans was Carter's doing.

That $300 was nothing more than an advance on next years return anyway.
 
supersizeme said:
I don't follow politics but that was a pretty ignorant post Ryan. who is president and what party they are affiliated with has very little to nothing to do with the economic trend. had gore been elected, the economy still would have gone down.

I didn't place blame on anyone here, supersizeme. I'm simply stating facts..........

The question is whether these facts are simply coincidence? If these economic facts are coincidence, then it's certainly a BIG ONE.
 
Last edited:
thefantom1 said:


Damnit!!!! RyanH you are pissing me off here...again!!!!!! You and I are not suppossed to agree on things.....

I'm glad that we can finally agree........:D
 
Is it me or is Bush on vacation every time I see him on TV? When I saw Clinton on TV after his speech on TV to the nation while serving president. He was looking like shit already. Looking shit because he was busting balls! No it wasn't on that fat pig Monica. If the CEO of a company spent more time on the gulf course instead of the office, wouldn't it have some sort of bad repercussion on the company?
 
Gotta Be True

If the Weekly World News says so. After all look at this bit of factual info from them. They are a credible source.

water1.gif
 
RyanH, the stock market started tanking in March 2000 and was down 40% when Clinton left office. Bush is now starting to clean up the mess Clinton left him with.
 
Shrebly said:
Start a neighborhood network – in case of things get bad you can all live together and exist as a team rather than unorganized homeless mutants.

[portions of this review were taken from Weekly World news, August 14th publication]

"homeless mutants"???? Gimme a break. Who wrote this piece of trash, Dean Koontz?
 
Top Bottom