Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
M
MadCow1
Guest
Injection or not - substance remains the same. You only bypass the digestive system. It will still be in your blood and hit liver/kidney.
Being 17aa,it makes no difference the route of administration,it will be passed through multiple times and ultimately metabolized by the liver.This is the process by which this substance is broken down in the body,and it makes very little difference how it's administered,it still goes through the same enzymatic processes...
C
Cuts
Guest
cockdezl said:
Hmmm... I find that somewhat hard to believe considering that with the size increase came a significant STRENGTH increase too. I don't think that "muscular irritation" would make the muscle stronger, do you?
"Hmmm... I find that somewhat hard to believe considering that with the size increase came a significant STRENGTH increase too. I don't think that "muscular irritation" would make the muscle stronger, do you?"
CUTS, strength is a variable that increases with steroid use. Are you using any other steroids in your cycle? It would be difficult to ascribe the strength increase to the stanazolol, along with the fact that strength increases are influenced by many factors, aside from the drugs.
CUTS, strength is a variable that increases with steroid use. Are you using any other steroids in your cycle? It would be difficult to ascribe the strength increase to the stanazolol, along with the fact that strength increases are influenced by many factors, aside from the drugs.
The Iron Game
New member
cockdezl said:
Cuts said:
Nuff Said
Btw Cockdezl, I dont ever remember mentioning how much knowledge you have and what an asset you are to the board. You should try and express your view a little more frequently if you have some free time on your hands. You teach many things. Am I an Ass Kisser? No. Can I respect and appreciate the non bs biased info you provide? Yes
C
Cuts
Guest
CPA said:
I'm using 1/2 inch 27G pins. Still hurts, but it's worth it.
C
Cuts
Guest
Iron Game:
I get the feeling I'm being patronized here. I may not be a veteran when it comes to AS use, and I may not know as much about AS as a lot of you guys on this board, but I that doesn't mean that I'm always wrong. FYI, the statement I made earlier about the size increase being accompanied by a significant strength increase did take into account other variables (i.e. other AS). My first cycle consisted of Deca and Winny for 8 weeks. I grew and got stronger, but my bis (one of my weaker points) remained relatively unchanged in both size and strength. My second Deca-Winny cycle is when I started to site inject into my bis. I used basically the same dosages, and all the other factors were just about equal also. I GOT LOCAL GROWTH. Iron, you're making it sound like local growth is a myth b/c you say it is. Period. It is a fact. You are right and I am wrong. This isn't a very scientific opinion. The only way we could REALLY determine the effectivity of site injections is to conduct a rigorous, stringent study including a large # of subjects, both positive and negative controls, unbias experimenters, and probably a whole host of other miscallaneous additions. This is the ONLY way one could with definity say whether or not site injecting works or not. Your opinion is that it doesn't. Mine is that it does. Later.
I get the feeling I'm being patronized here. I may not be a veteran when it comes to AS use, and I may not know as much about AS as a lot of you guys on this board, but I that doesn't mean that I'm always wrong. FYI, the statement I made earlier about the size increase being accompanied by a significant strength increase did take into account other variables (i.e. other AS). My first cycle consisted of Deca and Winny for 8 weeks. I grew and got stronger, but my bis (one of my weaker points) remained relatively unchanged in both size and strength. My second Deca-Winny cycle is when I started to site inject into my bis. I used basically the same dosages, and all the other factors were just about equal also. I GOT LOCAL GROWTH. Iron, you're making it sound like local growth is a myth b/c you say it is. Period. It is a fact. You are right and I am wrong. This isn't a very scientific opinion. The only way we could REALLY determine the effectivity of site injections is to conduct a rigorous, stringent study including a large # of subjects, both positive and negative controls, unbias experimenters, and probably a whole host of other miscallaneous additions. This is the ONLY way one could with definity say whether or not site injecting works or not. Your opinion is that it doesn't. Mine is that it does. Later.
IG, hehe......funny stuff 
I agree with the Cockedzl thing too. He seems to just come
and go then fade away. It would be great if he would post
more regularly.
Cuts, by injecting a C17-aa steroids, you by-pass the active
steroid molecule from being metabolized by the liver on
the first pass. This yields a 3-7% reduction in the effectiveness
of the Stanozolol.
Moral of the story: Take an extra 5mg tab/day. Why would you
want to feel like a pin-cushion all day? Not to mention the
scar tissue issue.
Godspeed
I agree with the Cockedzl thing too. He seems to just come
and go then fade away. It would be great if he would post
more regularly.
Cuts, by injecting a C17-aa steroids, you by-pass the active
steroid molecule from being metabolized by the liver on
the first pass. This yields a 3-7% reduction in the effectiveness
of the Stanozolol.
Moral of the story: Take an extra 5mg tab/day. Why would you
want to feel like a pin-cushion all day? Not to mention the
scar tissue issue.
Godspeed
C
Cuts
Guest
So Fonz, what's you're opinion on site injecting and local growth with Winny Depot?
