By A. Russell.
A personal tale of how I discovered individualist freedom in a world of conformist collectivism.
You have probably seen them, skulking around the city doing their best to look as horribly depressed as they can. You may even laugh at them, or think that they cut themselves or worship the devil. If you are of the evangelical persuasion, you will probably demand that they accept your religion or they will spend their lives burning in the fires of hell. Either way, you observe this strange species, his or her (trust me, its hard to tell) meticulously done black eyeliner, painted fingernails and wonderfully elaborate clothes of black velvet/leather. As they sit there, bemoaning their angst/latest personal crisis/latest breakup with a sex partner you probably snicker and forget them, merely leaving them as a sideshow odditty.
The Suburban Goth/Freak/Punk/Rivethead/Glamrocker/Cyberhead or whatever label you can think of is the species I am talking about. Hated at school, unpopular amongst any group and worrisome to their normally suburban middle-class parents, they are seen as a peril to society. They only exist to politicians when a school shooting takes place, and even then only the militant religious conservatives go kicking them about as a political football. However, these strange creatures of the night are actually the natural allies of Libertarianism and Capitalism, although many of them do not know it yet.
I am one of these freaks. I have practically monopolised Brisbane's supply of black, red and purple business shirts. I listen to underground electro music (not techno) from an American record label that you have never heard of (Metropolis Records,
www.metropolis-records.com) and I am a male that wears makeup (although I find females very sexually appealing). If I ever show up at one of the ALS dinners, im the guy in the top hat and/or pinstriped pants and/or the two-toned mascara. You may all think of me as some demented Marxist at first, but suprise suprise, I support Laissez-Faire (or coming very close to it) Free Markets.How did I reach this situation? When one is indoctrinated with such bilge as "Capitalism creates conformism, and you are unpopular because of Capitalism" it is very hard to be a Freak for Free Markets.
I was always an Individual. I decided not to conform. I decided to be myself. A note to all parents reading this: Telling your children that "people will like you if you be yourself" is nothing less than shameless deceit. Either way, I wanted to be myself. I decided not to lie and cover up who I was. In embracing my individuality, I committed social suicide and damned myself to having my head flushed down the toilet, my lunch money stolen, and having religious conservatives telling me to accept Jesus. My response to the latter was usually an enthusiastic, if blasphemous, 'F*** Jesus Christ'. I saw through the lies perpetuated by the group, all of these being mechanisms of control. The first of these was religion, which by its very nature demands unquestioning conformity. The second of these was Society, which is merely a construct of individuals, yet for some reason, held precedence over its members. After I rejected society, I rejected higher powers. I decided to live for myself. I decided to enthrone Andrew Russell on the throne that 'God' once defiled. I placed by purpose in life into this world. As a result, I had become what Neitszche would have called the Ubermensch/Overman, I destroyed God, re-evaluated old ideas and traditions, and overcame nihilism. I now had a will to power, where I could create my own values and ethics, and that I did.
As I raged against the tyrranny of the collective and tried to free others from its iron grip, I eventually reached my last two years of purgatory/high school. I began studying economics, and over those two years, I began to convert to Laissez-Faire Chicago School Free Market Capitalism. It was cemented in my soul when I doscovered the website of the United States Libertarian Party, the only American Political Party that sounded remotely sane. After reading their literature and analysing it with the strict economic reasoning that had been given to me by years of note taking and drawing Demand/Supply analysis graphs, I discovered the fundamental truth behind economics. Specifically, everyone is better off when they are free to make their own choices without being annoyed by bureaucrats. It was like an epiphany to see this made real, and to see the transparency of the Trendy Left's arguments.
However, I was left with two vastly contrasting doctrines. Remember, I was taught from a young age that Capitalism was synonymous with banning drugs, censoring media, being a racist and protesting Marilyn Manson concerts. I was then told that equality of races and genders, freedom of thought and the legalisation of drugs were embodied within Socialism. I felt like a political schizophrenic, and a paranoid one at that. Even though I supported Libertarianism, I never knew how "economically right-wing and socially left-wing" could be logically reconciled with my non-conformist views. I was trained to belive that my black-painted fingernails were Marxist! Eventually, however, I combined my hatred of conformism with my love of Capitalism into my own personal ethical system of Individualist Egoism. For helping me bridge the gap, I must thank Ayn Rand and Objectivism.
The answer was right in front of my eyes all along, especially since I had a copy of Atlas Shrugged in my bookcase. Command Economics is like conformism. In both cases, the average is exhalted and the outstanding is despised. In both situations, difference is seen as a hazzard and in both situations, the group was seen as more important than the individuals that made it up. The link was simple, and although I technically made it before I read Rand, I never saw it. I had denied external authority. I had denied society. I had denied god. I had enthroned myself, and hence my own self interest, as my object of devotion. Thanks to Ayn Rand, it all made sense. Capitalism was the will of the individual applied to economics. Capitalism wasn't about skyscrapers or advancing society. It was about empowering the individual and applauding his achievement, and better still, the system benefitted everyone. Individuals, supreme over their own affairs, and I, with a renewed sense of vigour, began celebrating my individuality. I picked up my eye pencil with the same vigour as I would imagine John Galt picking up his pen to sign a contract.
I saw the world nowm torn between two opposing forces. The first was the forces of the group, demanding unquestioning conformity to their whims. They demanded the greatest good for the greatest number and the destruction of the individual ego. The second was the force of Individuality, which said that I am an end in myself. It was the force of true rebellion, running through history. I saw figures ranging from Ayn Rand and Frederich Neitszche to Anton LaVey and Marilyn Manson, telling me that I could be myself and not a pawn of the masses. Just for the record, I was not on LSD at the time.
And that is why Captialism is the system of the individual. I embraced it wholeheartedly and I now vigorously defend it from the attacks of the student left (hypocritical trendy-lefties with no taste in coffee or clothing). What does my story mean to Libertarianism? What does it mean to all who belive in the Individual? It means this; when you see a freak in the city, or you see a strange kid being picked on in school, don't hate them. Tell them that you support their aesthetic choices. Tell them that Captialism is not slavery to the whims of the group (and in fact, its the total opposite). On an ethical level, freaks and outcasts are the natural allies of libertarianism. Dont be afraid of them merely because the boys wear more makeup than the girls.