I never said gods and the religions that surround them were the same thing, and I use the terms when I mean to. I was going to write about that just now, but it doesn't really have to do with this specific argument so I'll save it for another time.

lol
Anyways, my point is just that you may not realize it, but you're projecting your beliefs on others here. Your god is
your moral absolute, so I can agree that to you good and evil exist measured by the 'good' standard of your god. But your god, or more importantly any god at all, isn't everybody's moral absolute.
Buddhism has been around longer than Christianity and Buddhists don't believe in a god or gods. The original Buddha did not believe in a 'creator' and believed thoughts of a supreme being were a waste of time that could have been spent reaching nirvana.
Buddha also is not and never claimed to be a god, and his followers do not believe in one, but they have clear distinctions and ideas between good and evil and also clear paths to get to either extreme. A god is not their moral absolute, a plain man who lived a good life is, and that is how the measure and define good and evil.
Abstract ideas like good and evil exist with or without a god, maybe not for you, but in general definitely.