Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Do ANY prohormones work? My take on them and the questions I have...

Status
Not open for further replies.

DetCord

New member
*MODS I understand this belongs on the Diet and Supplement board but that doesn't get much traffic. I just ask this stays here for a day or two to lend to a better understanding of steroids and other popular supplements*

-Disclaimer- I have a better than average "Joe Schmoe Off The Street" knowledge of steroids (learned here) but I don't know everything and may actually be wildly fucked up in some cases.


In my opinion (since I don't have any facts), the test knock off prohormones like Andro don't work. I used it once bit before I knew much and didn't gain anything on it. But that could also be blamed on my diet and training. I later did 7 weeks of sust and gained 11 lbs of ripped muscle, but my diet and training were also top notch by then.

Anyway, I guess I'm a bit confused as to which prohormones work, if any and why/why not. The science sounds resonable to a degree but I'm a bit confused on a couple of points.

Most steroids are injected, bypassing the liver and entering the bloodstream unaltered. Prohormones, at least the ones I've heard about, are taken orally. Somehow they are suppose to be altered in the body to become true steroids. But if this change takes place in the liver, then wouldn't the liver continue breaking them down all the way until they were as useless as a real steroid taken orally?

There are only 3 steroids I can think of off the top of my head that are taken orally; D-Bol, Ox and Winny. Winstrol is broken down somewhat in the liver but can be injected and is more potent if done so, lending to lower dosages. I have no idea if D-Bol and Ox are broken down in the liver but I don't think they are to any large extent. I seem to remember that they were designed so the liver didn't affect them so injections were unnecessary. SO my assumption would be that if a prohormone were to be viable, it would have to be based on 1 of these substances. I would also have to assume that any pure Testosterone derivitive would be useless taken orally.

NOW one of the things I've heard discussed on this board is that prohormones compared to "real" steroids give all the same side effects but none of the benefits. I don't understand the logic behind that at all. If they're crap, I'd expect no, or totally different side effects.

I was scaning the new ESPN magazine (I think that's the one) and it discussed what athletes are using and how they're getting around the rules. One section I scanned talked about Bill Llewlyn and his work with prohormones. The one I remember them discussing was (I think) Eq. I thought that was an injected steroid. If it is, how could it be taken orally?

Are there any prohormones that work anywhere near "as advertised"? If so, I'd expect to have to take some Liquidex with Andro or 19-Norandro.

Could the claims for products based on D-Bol, Ox and Winstrol be true since these are oral steroids anyway?

If these prohormones do work, how do they use the liver to their benefit (altering into steroids) and then exit the liver without being further broken down?

And lastly, who has used prohormones as well as real steroids and can offer their own opinions?
 
I don't have any answers, just wanted to say it's a good question and I hope someone out there puts out some answers. I've used andro and had better workouts with it for a short time but I think it was just psychological. I've also used Primobolan Acetate orals from Promatrix. It's a legal supp advertised in lots of mags and is expensive at $70 a bottle that lasts 10 days. You can go on real AS for that. But I did get some results with it- 5lb gain in 3 weeks with no change in bf. Lots of companies (impact, sdi labs, etc) are claiming they have legal stack that rival as and I'd like to hear the real deal on this stuff.
 
>And lastly, who has used prohormones as well as real steroids and can offer their own opinions?

1-test transdermal:

I used it for 2-weeks. I had prostate problems and had to stop. pumps were good. Made me feel like a total pussy, which is a good thing. Made my bones hurt. made me tired. Got puffy nips and some leaky shit out of my left nip. Made my balls shrink.

Good point: pumps were good.

I've been off it for three days. My balls are coming back. I'm feeling aggressive again.

The only way I can explain the gyno-like symptoms is that maybe when I had the 1-test in the beginning, my body recognized the androgen levels as being high and aromitized my own naturally produced testosterone.

Summary: Lots of sides, not much benefit. Not worth it for me.
 
Prohormones are garbage...Plain and simple.

OX, Winny and D-bol are 17-AA's and thusly survive a pass in the liver. All three can be injected as well.

1-Test may actually be legitimate, but not orally unless someone makes it as a 17-AA. Otherwise it needs to be injected. A simple fina kit can be used to create this.

Hope this anwers a few questions.
 
Juice Authority, I just went to the link you gave and skimmed over it. Great resource! Thanks for the input.
 
pushup said:
Juice Authority, I just went to the link you gave and skimmed over it. Great resource! Thanks for the input.


Don't be a fool. Asking pat arnold about prohormones is like asking a vacuum cleaner saleman if you need a vacuum cleaner.

They all stink. They have the sides of steroids without the benifit because they're essentially lousy steroids.

And ask yourself this -- even a real steroid has to be 17 AA to be effective. How can that crap possibly do anything?
 
Nelson Montana said:



Don't be a fool. Asking pat arnold about prohormones is like asking a vacuum cleaner saleman if you need a vacuum cleaner.

They all stink. They have the sides of steroids without the benifit because they're essentially lousy steroids.

And ask yourself this -- even a real steroid has to be 17 AA to be effective. How can that crap possibly do anything?

WTF Nelson?? That's totally out of line. I suppose Big Cat is an idiot too.
 
Juice Authority said:


WTF Nelson?? That's totally out of line. I suppose Big Cat is an idiot too.

Telling the truth is out of line?


Fact: Pat arnold sells prohormones.

Fact: 1fast, the guru supplement watchdog over at bb.com sells prohormones.

How can you say they'd give a unbiased appraisal of prohormones? Why do you defend them? Because they're popular? I would think you'd know better.


I don't know who who Big Cat is .


And one more thing. I called no one an idiot so please stop this habit you have of replacing peoples words with your own projections.
 
Nelson Montana said:


Telling the truth is out of line?


Fact: Pat arnold sells prohormones.

Fact: 1fast, the guru supplement watchdog over at bb.com sells prohormones.

How can you say they'd give a unbiased appraisal of prohormones? Why do you defend them? Because they're popular? I would think you'd know better.


I don't know who who Big Cat is .


And one more thing. I called no one an idiot so please stop this habit you have of replacing peoples words with your own projections.

Yeah, Pat Arnold sells Prohormones and you sell books. What's the difference?? You promote your theories and he promotes products. He has happens to be one of the foremost authorities when it comes to various Prohormones, which is what the thread starter what inquiring about. Also, referring to someone as a vacuum cleaner saleman is a compliment???

Furthermore, you know exactly who Big Cat is. He's the head Mod over at BB.com that tore you a new one several times. I'm not going to post links because I have agreed to keep things civil with you. You pulled this same shit with SwoleCat about his diet plan that seems to be working excellent for many people.
 
Last edited:
Is Big Cat the steroid authority who never used steroids? What a laugh.

You're a perfect example of the type of people these scheisters love. You go to bat for them because you're so impressed with anyone who cuts and pastes information from somewhere else.

Yes, I sell my books and PA sells his supps and he has a right to say my books stink and I have a right to say his products stink. Actually, I'm holding off on the 6 OXO. I've heard good things but I want to see for myself. I'll be fair. But you, JA, you just want to be a part of the "winning team". You back up people like Big Cat because he has all the kids over a BB.com convinced he's the shit. You're just a follower without an original thought of your own.
 
I thought you guys were gonna ignore each other....lol

JA, you know nelson is right on this one, I don't listen to Muscletech ads even when they have pretty charts and graphs, the prohormone thing is ridiculous, of course these guys want you to trust them so they can sell their shit and make money. Nelson wants the same things, you don't listen to Nelson when he says his book is the shit do you....lol
 
I think what Nelson is getting at is that PA isnt going to say PH's suck becuase he sells them....No sale...No Profit...

Seriously do you think he gives a shit what gains you get or dont get...they just care what kinda money you are handing over to that business since they all reap the benefits...
 
..

Transdermal DMSO preps of 1-Test/4AD work wonderfully

I gained as much size and strength from my first cycle of transdermal 1Test/4AD as I did from Fina/SUST

Only drawback was skin irritation from DMSO AND receptor saturation happens within 3 to 4 weeks with 1 Test so you have to do REALLY short cycles.

Fina just fucks with my nuts way too bad to ever use that shit again.



None of this shit works orally because you have to take ridiculous amounts of it. You either have to go transdermal (DMSO/Plogel) or you gotta inject them.

They work. Period.
 
Nelson Montana said:



Don't be a fool. Asking pat arnold about prohormones is like asking a vacuum cleaner saleman if you need a vacuum cleaner.

They all stink. They have the sides of steroids without the benifit because they're essentially lousy steroids.

And ask yourself this -- even a real steroid has to be 17 AA to be effective. How can that crap possibly do anything?


Sorry, I have to disagree with you on this. I don't need to listen to anyone else's success stories with PH's (be it Patrick Arnold's or 1fast's), all I need to know is my own personal results with them, and I can say this, it's a hell of alot more than a placebo effect.

When used properly and when the necessary ancillaries are taken to combat sides, you can get very real results with very little sides effects (and it's also legal, which steroids aren't; and although you may not care, this is a concern for some people).

I've blown right through a plateau I've been stuck at for the last 3 years with the use of 1-AD and a 4-AD transdermal, and the only side effect I noticed was a drop in libido.

So you can sit there and blow smoke up everyone's ass by saying "they suck, they suck, they suck, they suck"...............but until you can provide some real proof, please give it a rest.
 
im very aware of this being my first post, and hence not being terribly trustworthy. as well as my lack of chemical knowledge, but since i came across this thread i figured i might as well weigh in with some ph experience.

first of all, most ph's are 17a methylated, i sadly dont know if this have the same effect as being alkylated. but my common sense, and low knowledge of chemistry tells me there's some connection (methylalcoloids).

second up, i have some experience with aas, namely sustanon 250. which was indeed effective. without going to much into pointless detail, i enjoyed it, and had very few sides. (a bit of back pain towards the end of the cycle, ordinary libido, and some strength gains).
after loosing my supplier, i decided to give ph's a try. did a bit of research, and ended up with stacking superdrol and cyanostane 20/40mg daily for 2 weeks, and 30/60mg for 2 weeks. although i wasnt seeing the same gains as with 750 mg of sustanon a week, i was seeing larger strength gains. (while admittedly not following my diet, or exercise plan as well as i should have). my liver took a bit of a bigger hit but was back to norman a few weeks later, i had some nausea for an hour or 2 briefly after eating the tablets, i had sore joints for the last 2 weeks, and i was horny as hell from day 3 and onwards. while making less mass gains, i ended up keeping a larger percentage of them after the end of my pct.
comparatively, sustanon ended up giving me roughly 7 kg's/15lb's, and the ph stack gave me roughly 5kg's/10.5lb's, with a slight decrease in body fat over a 2 weeks shorter cycle with heavier sides, and larger strength gains.
i guess what im trying to say, is something like: my research tells me that ph's should have an effect, but that since they're not as potent but just as toxic, dosages, and sides will have to be higher. my personal experience tells me that they do work, but that they end up being just as expensive. given that you will need a lot more supplements to protect your liver and joints (on occasion viagra), and a longer and more expensive pct. if i had the luxury of choice at the moment, i would probably go with a proper aas, but given the lack of supply, im willing to live with the extra sides and do it again.
im about to start experimenting with epistane, on a 50mg a day 5 week cycle, with a 3 day ramp up to the 50 mg's a day. and if anyone is interested, i will gladly share my experience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom