Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

crisis the sixth

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just watched "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow"

What a piece of shit !

Interesting Visual Effects but so poor plot that I was about to stop before the end

Fortunately the smile of Angelina Jolie was worth the 2 hours pain
 
samoth 131
Anthrax 73
hamstershaver 61
string_bean00 55
bran987 53
SoKlueles 48
Lady Viking 47
SoreArms 44
JerseyArt 40
Ulcasterdropout 32
HumanTarget 26
Mr. dB 25
goldenone 23
jaded 22
bluepeter 19
Lestat 17
Devastation 16
Festina Lente 14
sawastea 13
canadianhitman 11
ChewYxRage 11
spongebob 10
ceo 9
@dam 9
4everhung 9
juicedpigtails 9
Frisky 7
Deterass 7
Urine8 6
biteme 6
FISHTALES 5
gymrat 5
SacStateHornet 5
EnderJE 4
Whiskey 4
mountain muscle 4
KillahBee 4
powerslave 3
The Wenis 3
Cut 3
elite fry 2
notoriousQQ 2
UA_Iron 2
trailseeker 1
Gambino 1
Hurricane Man 1
Subzeero 1
 
4everhung said:
I remember reading a few years ago that it might work if before your cycle you took small doses of a steroid like 200mg. primo or deca for a few weeks to help get your body and immune system primed for your real cycle that follows. It kinda makes sense on paper, do you guys think that this would work? Cause Test Flu sucks!!

Can you use a pellet gun to implant Finaplix pellets in a human? Where would be the best implantation site?
 
I'm really #1 on that list? Dude...

Seriously, ya'll need to post something more interesting. Either that, or stop typing completely and communitate the next 10 pages using only smilies. Or get nathan in here. Hell, as long as it ain't full of Jerseyart trying to mack on all the EF slimmies, then it's all good.



:cow:
 
1000th post on this thread

I can go to bed now

See you guys
 
sponge bob suggested I paste this in here


Epsilon-delta definition

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay I need some help I think I got the answer but not sure

prove the lim as x approach 2 (-x^3 +1)=-7 using the epsilon-delta definition of the limit

so for every epsilon greater than zero there exists a delta greater than zero

0<lx-2l<delta then, l(-x^3 +1) +7l<epsilon

which works out to l-x^3 +8l<epsilon

when you do the graph I am getting delta: 1 as 2- cubed root of (8-epsilon) and delta: 2 as cube root of (8+epsilon) -2

Not sure how this relates
I was getting all this for my homework problems then the teacher gave us these problems and now I am lost... Grrr
 
courtneybcca said:
sponge bob suggested I paste this in here


Epsilon-delta definition

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay I need some help I think I got the answer but not sure

prove the lim as x approach 2 (-x^3 +1)=-7 using the epsilon-delta definition of the limit

so for every epsilon greater than zero there exists a delta greater than zero

0<lx-2l<delta then, l(-x^3 +1) +7l<epsilon

which works out to l-x^3 +8l<epsilon

when you do the graph I am getting delta: 1 as 2- cubed root of (8-epsilon) and delta: 2 as cube root of (8+epsilon) -2

Not sure how this relates
I was getting all this for my homework problems then the teacher gave us these problems and now I am lost... Grrr

Okay, I solved it, but without using any graphical methods. I'm rather pissed at MATLAB and it's stupic programming language, so that's kinda a touchy subject with me right now. Along with the impending E&M exam.

What exactly are you trying to ask? How the graph relates? If so, you'll have to tell me how to imput it into one of the math OS's I have, 'cuz the only thing I know thoroughly is the TI-86. Everything else involves referencing a stupid manual 1,000 pages thick.

Anyway, off that tangent, can you please clarify a bit? Did you work out a numerical proof or are you just using going by the graph? Also, what time is it where you are? I really hope I'm not the only person up at 4:00AM doing math.


:cow:
 
samoth said:
Okay, I solved it, but without using any graphical methods. I'm rather pissed at MATLAB and it's stupic programming language, so that's kinda a touchy subject with me right now. Along with the impending E&M exam.

What exactly are you trying to ask? How the graph relates? If so, you'll have to tell me how to imput it into one of the math OS's I have, 'cuz the only thing I know thoroughly is the TI-86. Everything else involves referencing a stupid manual 1,000 pages thick.

Anyway, off that tangent, can you please clarify a bit? Did you work out a numerical proof or are you just using going by the graph? Also, what time is it where you are? I really hope I'm not the only person up at 4:00AM doing math.


:cow:
dumbass,it's not a real question
 
lmao @ courtney.




__________________________________________________

cereal killer!

sponge is no longer associated with the associates association.

Titanium Member
 
4everhung said:
dumbass,it's not a real question

Using methods the methods she stated, which can be found in any calculus text, I can arrive at a solution. It isn't defined at every point, but I can get a general solution. Note I never said I proved anything. I just solved what she gave me.

If ya'll want the work, I can post it up for you, since I did it already and shit.



:cow:
 
samoth said:
Using methods the methods she stated, which can be found in any calculus text, I can arrive at a solution. It isn't defined at every point, but I can get a general solution. Note I never said I proved anything. I just solved what she gave me.

If ya'll want the work, I can post it up for you, since I did it already and shit.



:cow:
dude
think again
 
4everhung said:
dude
think again

LOL, do you know what "real" means in the physics world?

I know exactly what you're hinting at. I hang out over at the homework help section of physics forums. No one does the entire problem for someone.

But if there was any seriousness here, I can still post up the solution. If not, it's 4:00 AM here, and I need to study.
 
samoth said:
LOL, do you know what "real" means in the physics world?

I know exactly what you're hinting at. I hang out over at the homework help section of physics forums. No one does the entire problem for someone.

But if there was any seriousness here, I can still post up the solution. If not, it's 4:00 AM here, and I need to study.
no I'm was an economics/accounting major
most don't know what "real" means in the economic sense
 
4everhung said:
no I'm was an economics/accounting major
most don't know what "real" means in the economic sense

either you was or you are, which is it?




__________________________________________________

cereal killer!

sponge is no longer associated with the associates association.

Titanium Member
 
4everhung said:
no I'm was an economics/accounting major
most don't know what "real" means in the economic sense

Since when does a calculus course obey the laws of economics? She didn't ask an econ question, it was a typical calc text problem. Therefore your reasoning you base your argument on is nullified.


econ pwned by calc ∫3x /∂/∂y / ∏z(i)


:cow:
 
samoth said:
Since when does a calculus course obey the laws of economics? She didn't ask an econ question, it was a typical calc text problem. Therefore your reasoning you base your argument on is nullified.


econ pwned by calc ∫3x /∂/∂y / ∏z(i)


:cow:
Therefore your reasoning you base your argument on is nullified.
calc pwned by English
 
samoth said:
But that's really not that far off from the truth...

My question is not a joke everhung is just an asshole don't listen to him please go back to the other thread I restated the question..
 
juicedpigtails said:
What is your opinion of "the field"?

FUUUUCKKKGG YOOOUYUFUCKING FUKC which fucking field I'm sick of everyone asking me about the fucking fiekds

Fucking fuck

Now... which fucking field? Actually, I don't care which fucking field it is. It has a uniform fucking density, it's integrated from an infinite point, and its a fucking closed surface integral. The answer is zero. Now fuck off.
 
4everhung said:
homework problems eh?

damn i cant keep up from thread to thread, what you hintin' at?




__________________________________________________

cereal killer!

sponge is no longer associated with the associates association.

Titanium Member
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cut
"no it is not a joke... dont listen to everhung he has a immature crush on me and if he doesn't stop fucking with my posts I will get him kicked off"-courtney
 
samoth said:
FUUUUCKKKGG YOOOUYUFUCKING FUKC which fucking field I'm sick of everyone asking me about the fucking fiekds

Fucking fuck

Now... which fucking field? Actually, I don't care which fucking field it is. It has a uniform fucking density, it's integrated from an infinite point, and its a fucking closed surface integral. The answer is zero. Now fuck off.


if not so late, i would reference a spirited discussion an old moderator here and I had regarding this topic. This occured during the 2 semesters of physics I took while finishing out my required calc classes.

but. fuck you you fucking fuck :cow:
 
courtneybcca said:
sponge bob suggested I paste this in here


Epsilon-delta definition

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay I need some help I think I got the answer but not sure

prove the lim as x approach 2 (-x^3 +1)=-7 using the epsilon-delta definition of the limit

so for every epsilon greater than zero there exists a delta greater than zero

0<lx-2l<delta then, l(-x^3 +1) +7l<epsilon

which works out to l-x^3 +8l<epsilon

when you do the graph I am getting delta: 1 as 2- cubed root of (8-epsilon) and delta: 2 as cube root of (8+epsilon) -2

Not sure how this relates
I was getting all this for my homework problems then the teacher gave us these problems and now I am lost... Grrr
if you were a teacher I'd be concerned
 
Morning

Isn't it V day today ?
 
Real bad workout. I should be punished.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cut
  • Like
Reactions: Cut
samoth said:
LaTeX. Physicsforums.com.

Help write cos^4x using only powers of one cosine. I think I have to use the half angle formula but could I also pull the 4 out and put it in front... I defiantly need to review my trig...
 
Tried to get motivated both days to actually do something

No luck
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom