comment on synthol in bodybuilding

[FlexManning]

All these magazines bash synthol saying how fake and awful the results look, and then
they're like look at Flex's cannonball shoulders, look at Ernie Taylor's tris, look how
Ronnie brought those calves up with hard work. And listen to this: I didn't realize the
extent too which the pros were using synthol until I heard a guy who was marketing
his own site injection product talking about who was using synthol and on what parts.The
guy mentioned Nasser using it in his bis so I went and grabbed a Flex Magazine with a
big picture of him in it, and he had nasty bruises on the top of his bis! These writers
bitch and bitch about synthol and then complement synthol based bodyparts.

 

[smalmovesal]

will it make my boobies bigger?

 

[chillin408]

Yea, the magizines that give the immpression that bodybuilding is a clean sport also bitch about steriods,gh, even clen,etc. If ephedrine becomes legal, in 5-10 years,if they are on the same pace that they have been on they will be talking about how evil it is,and how it killed some many people,classfiying it in the same page as steriods and how athletes who used it wish they never did,like they talked trash about clen, I don't know what they said about it when it was legal though,maybe they trashed because of the people who were behind it.

Anyway yea it sucks that all the mags just lie and portray a false image to the public. I use to think that only the obvious used synthol. But after hearing what happened to milos, and milos didn't even look like he used it in my eyes, image how many other people who don't look like they use it, use it.

Have you ever seen that article in flex, it was last year. Ernie taylor was saying not to talk trash about his triceps and basically denying the use of synthol or implants. I'm not saying he uses, but I wouldn't be suprised if its a lie, since thats what most of the mags are.

I guess I could believe their is some people out there with freaky genetics that may allow taylors triceps, but its hard to believe that its just a concidence thats hes a bodybuilder and has them. So about 98% of me says he did shit to them, but I guess its possible that he didn't, but I'm probably just being suckered to believe it.

The writers also bitch and bitch about steriods but compliment everyone whos uses them. You will almost never(99.9%) see someone in those mags who is not juiced. Maybe if you see a pic of one of the writers(LOL), that will be the only time. Or on the very rare occasion if theres a natural in there, I mean someone who parades around as a natural like skip or o hearn.

In my opinion, If steriods are allowed, then so should synthol. It should either be an all out war using whatever tactics or it should be limited, but no pick and chose. Maybe ephedrine be legal but thats it, If they wanted realy regulate then ephedrine would'nt be considered cheating(not make it illegal,but if you competed then illegal). I wouldn't mind that. But, I think its stupid to pick and chose what is legal and what is not. Since steriods are not tested,then they shouldn't care about implants or synthol either,in my opinion.

 

[Drifter]

I have to dissagree with you based on my limited knowledge of synthol. If I am correct synthol doesn't require you to workout whatsoever to get big bi's. Just pump in some oil and over time you have great guns...or whatever bodypart you are injecting to. Same goes with implants, no work necessary. At least with juice you are still forced to work your ass off in the gym to get the results. I don't care if you are taking 3 grams of test a week you aren't going to look like Yates without hitting the weights.

Of course if I am mistaken about synthol you can disregard this post

 

[chillin408]

Whether synthol requires one to workout or not,I don't think people care. Thats doesn't matter, what matters is what someone looks like on stage. Whether it was through surgery, sythol, or whatever way. Almost always,No one cares how hard someone works etc.

An example....When someone is born with natural running speed and runs a 10.5 the first time they step on the track, and then their is someone else who works harder than him but never ran as fast as him, no one cares. All they care about is the end result. So that is why I think that since steriods(perfermacne enchancing) are legal(Ok to use in BB), then Synthol should be ok to use too.

If you are concerned about work ethic, and who works the hardest...Then you should be for an all natural competition. No steriods,NO eca,No implants, etc, just food and lifting. Your belief is another pick and chose what is ok to use idea.

Ignoring the public, mainly ignoring the people who workout naturally. The contest that allows steriods,gh ,etc but not synthol or implants makes sense. Only if all the participates are ok with the use of the steriods,gh etc. But looking at the whole workout community and making those rules(pick and chose) is not cool.

What I am saying is this. Most if not all the top BB use steriods like naturals use creatine. Their usage of drugs portrays them to have the attitude that steriods are no more harmful than a steak. So, everyone having that attitude its as if steriods ,gh are natural ,since no one looks at them like a threat.

Now the next level...implants,synthol. Some Top BB might look it at at hesitate and be scared. That is like how naturals are scared of roids and gh. Its just another level up.

Bodybuilding is more than just how much someone works out and diets. Genetics, drugs,timing, synthol, diet,training....it all matters.

The work to become a better better bodybulider is not just working out. It can be mental too by dieting,pain etc. Dieting is not working out. You can also add pain and risk under "work" to become a bodybulider. Thinking like this will allow you to think that using synthol and getting surgery are both sacrifices. Just like using steriods and gh on top of working out is a sacrifice, to make you better than working out naturally.

I don't think there is a fair way to hold a competion, since everyone was born with different ablities. Even the olympics aren't always a competiion where the hardest working athelethes compete. Most of the were born with the ability. All I mean is, why are they allowing some perfermance enchancing items, but not others??? At least the olympics make sense, they all no perfermance enchancing items. Probably the fairest way to do would be all out,using everything. Another way is all natural, using nothing.

When a natural says " I would look like that if I used " ,Its a Sin and a crime, and the juicer will get mad. But its ok for a juicer to say " I would look like that if i used synthol". I think thats messed up.