can nat low test levels support cycle gains?

[leonidas33]

If someone does not have sufficienct nat test levels, when they come off their cycle and revert back to their normal low level, is that going to allow the newly gained muscle to be maintained?

 

[mattdan]

Yes,

The same way drinking a beer sobers you up.

 

[leonidas33]

Yes,

The same way drinking a beer sobers you up.

What? No really... does anyone know?

 

[mattdan]

If someone does not have sufficienct nat test levels, when they come off their cycle and revert back to their normal low level, is that going to allow the newly gained muscle to be maintained?

I'm honestly not trying to flame you here bro, that that is the dumbest question I've seen in a while.

Test builds muscle, so how could lack of test be conducive to maintaining it?

 

[Nelson Montana]

If someone does not have sufficienct nat test levels, when they come off their cycle and revert back to their normal low level, is that going to allow the newly gained muscle to be maintained?

You may want to look into natural T boosters pre and post cycle. That will give you an edge toward maintaining gains. If your natty T is below 300, get HR T.

 

[mr.nitro]

I actualy think this was a good question. will a hypogonadial male be able to maintain post cycle gains. I don't know

 

[Nelson Montana]

I actualy think this was a good question. will a hypogonadial male be able to maintain post cycle gains. I don't know

Obviously it will be more difficult. Depends on how low we're talking.

 

[leonidas33]

I'm honestly not trying to flame you here bro, that that is the dumbest question I've seen in a while.

Test builds muscle, so how could lack of test be conducive to maintaining it?

because as one ages natural testerosterone declines and in turn so does muscle mass... so to me, this suggests that the amount of test in your body determines how much muscle mass the body can support. No?

 

[Nelson Montana]

because as one ages natural testerosterone declines and in turn so does muscle mass... so to me, this suggests that the amount of test in your body determines how much muscle mass the body can support. No?

It's certainly one factor. There are many -- some of which aren't yet known.

 

[mattdan]

It's certainly one factor. There are many -- some of which aren't yet known.

True, most likely the main factor. There are others like declining h gh levels and probably other factors like NM said.

Just look at the difference between men and women. Test is the primary reason.

 

[Stryker1992]

True, most likely the main factor. There are others like declining h gh - growth hormone (somatropin) - levels and probably other factors like NM said.

Just look at the difference between men and women. Test is the primary reason.

I thought it was tits and a vagina!

ROTFLMAO

 

[mr.nitro]

I thought it was tits and a vagina!

ROTFLMAO

haha, good one!

 

[totalpackaj]

If someone does not have sufficienct nat test levels, when they come off their cycle and revert back to their normal low level, is that going to allow the newly gained muscle to be maintained?

I have naturally low test and am in a study for a long lasting test. I get free medical coverage and test. I have to make sure I am off the test in time to be "low" when my blood is drawn quarterly. It is hard to maintain muscle with low natural T. See a urologist and he can help.