Breast Implants, Over or under the muscle?

[FreakMonster]

GF is getting the boob job soon and I was wondering what are the benefits or drawbacks of going over and under the muscle.

I heard the major drawback to getting them over the muscle is that in 5 yrs. you will start to get stretchmarks. Is this true?

 

[tripleV]

I would post this in the womens baord, but also do a search for this very topic, i know its been discussed there babe...

 

[FreakMonster]

Thanks, If any mods think this post would be better in the women's forum please feel free to move it there. Thanks

 

[goldenone]

My gf is getting hers done in may and she is going under the muscle.

I think she said things show up better on mammograms.

Here is a couple of links http://www.implantforum.com/disclaimer.html

http://www.breastimplants411.com/

 

[the nature boy]

under the muscle. my ex-g/f's doctor said ripples and other obvious tell tale signs are less visible. however that leaves doing any kind of chest excersizes out of the question.

 

[dawookie]

My g/f got hers under the muscle on Nov. 7th. Over the muscle looks less natural than under the muscle.. Under the muscle you've also got natural breast tissue at the top so they're a little softer.. under the muscle they are less likely to sag..

 

[legs]

If she does heavy chest training they will advise her on getting them over the muscle so it doesn't disrupt the muscles. Over the muscle gives the boobs more of an uplift look, however, they look less natural.

 

[FreakMonster]

If she does heavy chest training they will advise her on getting them over the muscle so it doesn't disrupt the muscles. Over the muscle gives the boobs more of an uplift look, however, they look less natural.

She does no weight training.

I guess from all the answers so far under the muscle is the way to go.

 

[starfish]

over

 

[TheGame2001]

OVER

LOOK MORE NATURAL OVER THE MUSCLE