Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

best with test

You're not flaming anyone because you are incorrect about your assumption that nandrolone is more potent mg per mg than eq. You also wont have to go out and by bromo with eq.

...But though rarely mentioned, I personally find boldenone the better choice for bulking. Due to its effect on vascularity it is mostly used for cutting, but if you had a drug that increased your appetite like boldenone does, would you really use it to lose weight? It makes more sense to use it in a stack with a testosterone ester like enanthate or cypionate for good gains, instead of nandrolone. Sort of as a base. It aromatizes less than nandrolone and doesn't have that pesky progestagenic effect either, and because it increases appetite it would provide you with the means to an end in terms of gaining weight. 300-400 mg a week of boldenone with 500 mg of sustanon or 500 mg of testosterone enanthate would form an incredible stack. Even for those who prefer deca, adding a small amount of boldenone will go a long way in improving appetite. But boldenone is stronger than Deca, mg for mg, as well as safer and less suppressive.
 
jubie i agree that EQ has far less sides than deca and i also agree that the hunger induced by EQ is an advantage.personally i would not use deca due to its side effects.but if you look closely at drug profiles on any given website you will notice that the effective dosage for deca is 200 to 400 mg/wk,the effective dosage for EQ tends to be closer to 300 to 600.this indicates to me that deca is slightly stronger than EQ.although it may not be the better choice overall.soooo according to the drug profiles of various boards including this one (chemical wizardry)you are incorrect my friend.:D
 
My previous post included an exerpt from bigcats article on EQ. You can check for yourself at: http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/catsteroids.htm Regarless of the recommended "effective dose" I still beleive Eq is stronger than Deca. I guess we can agree to disagree on this one.
 
lab-rat said:
i have used EQ with test and had good results and i plan on using it again in my next cycle but most of the research i have done states that EQ is a fairly mild anabolic.although i have never used deca i thought it was a stronger anabolic.im not looking to flame anyone but i have seen plenty of threads that say not to use less than 600mg per wk of EQ.just my 2cents.

You are wrong on both accounts:

1) Equi is a decent anabolic coupled with both a mild androgenic and a mild estrogenic effect. In structure it doesn't differ all that much from testosterone. Equi is also verifiably and structurally stronger than Deca, mg for mg. It would be like comparing Anadrol to D-bol and saying Anadrol is stronger MG for MG, which is not the case. MG for MG, D-bol is MUCH stronger than Anadrol yet most people don't realize that.

2) Unless you're frontloading for the first couple of week 300-400mg's of Equi is more than an adequate dose epsecially if you're stacking it with 500mg's of Sust 250 or Test Enan. Equi is a long-acting ester. When you say you've seen plenty of threads that say not to use less than 600mg's of Equi a week what is the basis for that??? Is there a study you can post to substantiate that statement? I didn't think so.

You might not be looking to "flame" anyone but your advice and conclusions are dead wrong.
 
Hard to flame someone when your wrong.:D
 
jubei said:
Hard to flame someone when your wrong.:D

Although the cold hard facts are laid out on Big Cat's profile I would think that would be more or less common sense amongst AS users. I guess not. :confused:
 
lab-rat said:
hey now play nice,dont be teaming up on me like that!

To be honest with you, I was just fucking around. I can't count how many times I've been wrong about something and had someone point it out to me. It helped me learn though. :)
 
Top Bottom