Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Atta reportedly trained in Baghdad prior to 9/11

2Thick said:


If the Bush administration say there is no connection, then there is no connection.

It is funny how you jump from not trusting this administration at all to hanging on its every word.
 
75th said:


It is funny how you jump from not trusting this administration at all to hanging on its every word.

I will slow it down for you since my post went right over your head.

If the Bush administration (who is doing everything it can to connect Iraq and Al Queda) says that no link exists, then there is absolutely ZERO proof otherwise the Bush administration would try to make something stick...even it it were somehwta plausible.
 
2Thick said:


I will slow it down for you since my post went right over your head.

If the Bush administration (who is doing everything it can to connect Iraq and Al Queda) says that no link exists, then there is absolutely ZERO proof otherwise the Bush administration would try to make something stick...even it it were somehwta plausible.

English cannot be your first language. "Far from proof" does not equal "Zero proof."

But, whatever you say. The point of this thread was to point out that there are certainly unknown variables not presented to us yet.

I think Iraq had WMD and we will find them. Can I prove it? Nope.

You think Iraq never had WMD, and therefore we will never find them. Can you prove it? Nope.
 
75th said:


English cannot be your first language. "Far from proof" does not equal "Zero proof."

But, whatever you say. The point of this thread was to point out that there are certainly unknown variables not presented to us yet.

I think Iraq had WMD and we will find them. Can I prove it? Nope.

You think Iraq never had WMD, and therefore we will never find them. Can you prove it? Nope.

English is actually my 4th language (out of 5 that I speak), but it is my best.

And far from prrof does equal zero proof.
 
2Thick said:
I will slow it down for you since my post went right over your head.

If the Bush administration (who is doing everything it can to connect Iraq and Al Queda) says that no link exists, then there is absolutely ZERO proof otherwise the Bush administration would try to make something stick...even it it were somehwta plausible.
2Thick is correct. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (created by congressional legislation and the signature of President George W. Bush) states that there is no real connection. It is laid out rather thoroughly in the commissions report. This is why the administration backed away from those initial claims and started basing its case against Iraq on the weapons threat rather than any putative links to bin Laden.

See: Saddam's Iraq and Support for Terrorism
 
Top Bottom